Methods of teaching are a field of invention and innovation. Its
directions cannot be predicted unless we carry out experiments and
field work in probing its results.
Hence, and endeavouring to change the routine way in teaching
and to search for novel educational ways leading probably to methods
reducing time or effort, or enhancing the learner’s datum-stability,
and agreeing with the attitudes of the educational institutions
attempting to harmonize with the zeitgeist which is permanently
renewable, changeable, and moveable, the researcher attempts
to investigate the use of the method of Brainstorming in teaching
Islamic ornamentation, a method which influences the learners’
understanding, memory and innovation. Thus, and in line with
the research methodology, the researcher divides his research into
four chapters. The first chapter discusses the problem of developing
the learner’s ability to draw the decorative shapes according to the
method of brainstorming.
The researcher does this experiment which its results, as those of
other earnest experiments, are hidden at the beginning. He endeavours
during a complete semester to achieve the aim of the
research which is knowing the range of validity of the method of
brainstorming in developing the ability of learners to draw decorative
shapes. The objective limits of the research are engineering
shapes representing a hidden basis in designing Islamic ornamentation.
Its spatial limits are second stage learners/Department of
Art Education/Faculty of Education/University of Kufa. The temporal
limit is the academic year (2010-2011).
The second chapter handles the theoretical side. In it, the researcher
deals with the literature of Islamic ornamentation, brainstorming
and its features and characteristics, and how to execute brainstorm306
ing session, its application steps and brainstorming supervisor’s or
leader’s supposed state.Brainstorming is a method of presenting
a subject in a form of a question stimulating learners’ incentive to
present suggestions to solve it in a way similar to free association
in the school of psychoanalysis via liberating learners to show their
opinions one by one, preventing interruption, objection or discussion
when the learner goes on elaborating on his opinions, and
hindering the group of learners from rejecting them even if they
are unreal and non-executable. This is to enable learners to empty
their suggestions to solve the problem synchronizing with recording
them. Later, the role of isolation comes to sift the suitable ones from
the unsuitable ones. Then, good solutions are developed to choose
the fittest to be the optimal solution agreed upon by the learners
and their teacher. All this is arranged and planned by the teacher so
as to fulfill the aims of the subject which demand a complete knowledge
of the standards of executing the method of brainstorming in
teaching. In the experiment, the teacher of Islamic ornamentation
is the researcher.
After considering the theoretical side, the researcher inspects four
previous studies dealing with similar subjects. But these studies
concentrate on theoretical fields in non-mixed educational environments,
i.e., non-coeducation environments.In chapter three, the researcher,
via mathematical statistics, specifies the research society.
They are (57) male and female learners. Fifty six of them represent
the research sample which consists of two groups. The experimental
group is composed of (21) female learners and (7) male ones.
Their total number is (28). They are taught by the method of brainstorming.
The control group includes (22) female learners and (6)
male ones. Their total is (28). The ordinary lecture method is used
in teaching them. The two groups are matched in age, sex, learning,
and materials needed in the practical accomplishment of ornaments.
In conformity with research requirements, the researcher depends
on the experimental methodology using statistical means such as
arithmetic mean, standard deviation, degree of freedom, and T-test.
In chapter four, the researcher registers his experiment results. The
most important result is the possibility to apply the method of brainstorming
in teaching the subject of Islamic ornamentation. Also, it is
possible to follow the traditional way in teaching without any variation
coefficient between the two methods. We can also rely on brainstorming
in teaching practical subjects whereas previous studies
focus on studying theoretical subjects only, use brainstorming just
to break the monotony of the ordinary lecture, make the group of
learners do most of the learning of the subject of Islamic ornamentation
and restrict the role of the teacher to coordinating the process
of learning rather than being a sinew of it. In this connection, the
researcher notices that the learners in the experimental group are
more stimulated than those in the control group, that is, they are
more interacted by renovation growing their motives in spite of the
constancy of the outputs.
The researcher concludes that there is no crucial factor in novelty.
The outputs of the two methods are not different as concerns the
subject under research. The experiment indicates that there is no
difference between the traditional teaching method (lecturing) and
the modern method of brainstorming. It is inferred that Islamic ornamentation
is old in its emergence and has the ability to develop and
renew in accordance with the spirit of the times and without any difference
in its content where it conforms to the new teaching method
as well as the old one with no lagging.The researcher suggests the
study of the effect of brainstorming method in teaching square Kufi
calligraphy. |