- All Journals
- Al-Qadisiyah University
- Basrah University
- Kirkuk University
- Mosul University
- The Iraqi Borad for Medical Specialization
- University of Anbar
- University of Technology
- Al Mustafa University
- Al-Zahraa University for Women
- Alnoor University
- Kunooz University
- Misan University
- Ninevah University
- Tikrit University
- University of Al-Hamdaniya
- University of Kerbala
Politically self-management: Hannah Arendt and understanding of the humanitarian situation Critique of totalitarianism to restore political action | ||
| Philosophy Journal | ||
| Article 1, Volume 0, Issue 12, 2018, Pages 41-62 | ||
| Author | ||
| Ali Aboud Malik Muhammadawi | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Considered the strategy principle as the highest hierarchies of rationalism, and that the political strategy principle is the result of ourselves strategy with the other in the framework of a system and requirements and expecting outputs. We attempt here with Hannah Arendt to understand how she was able to delineate the features of the emancipation image from the both aspects of the totalitarian principle as a movement or a system, in order to establish the elements of the political action and to restore the concept of the political power by its first origin which did not exceed the interaction in the public squares, which in reverse reveal ourselves in front of the others. In fact, this meant the freedom by word and deed as well as the equality in this right . Therefore, we need to stand up for the re- embodiment of this political power image in our current humanitarian situation as it is getting worse and witnesses more collapse , fragmentation and consumption of all values . So, it was also necessary to make the power in front of violence; that Arendt saw the violence as a tool which replaces and occupies the political situation when the power is absent. In other words, the power which is concerned with the opinion and the other one, the argumentation and political participation in the public space , as in the "Agora", means in fact the lack of need for violence because the argument and agreement are the master of the situation. While violence is what excludes originally the argument and the possibility of agreement, therefore, it is considered as a no-rational way in the most of its forms. We say ; Yes : in the most of its forms, because Arendt has shown us aspects of those rationality or the admissibility to use of the violence through the concept of revolution which meant for her an expression of a historical new birth and incarnation of freedom. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 169 PDF Download: 129 |
||