- All Journals
- Al-Qadisiyah University
- Basrah University
- Kirkuk University
- Mosul University
- The Iraqi Borad for Medical Specialization
- University of Anbar
- University of Technology
- Al Mustafa University
- Al-Zahraa University for Women
- Alnoor University
- Kunooz University
- Misan University
- Ninevah University
- Tikrit University
- University of Al-Hamdaniya
- University of Kerbala
THE QUILITY AND QUNTITY RESPONE OF TWO POTATO TUBERS CULTIVERS TO FOLIAR NUTRIENTSPRAYING OF SETTER-2 | ||
| Euphrates Journal of Agriculture Science | ||
| Article 1, Volume 7, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 18-26 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Maha A. Hussein; Allaa Sh. Naief; Ahmed H. Mahmmoud | ||
| Abstract | ||
| An experiment was carried out in special fields for spring growing season of 2013 in Abu-Ghraib (40 km west of Baghdad) to study the effect of the treatments of spraying nutrient setter-2 in qualitative and quantitative characteristics of potato tubers cultivars (Alaska and Safari) . The treatments of spraying nutrient included Setter-2 solution at three concentrations (0.8 , 1.6 and 3.2 ml.L-1) besides control treatment with using Randomized Complete Block Design in split – plot, the cultivars was considered as main-plot and spraying nutrient solution as sub – plot with three replications.The results showed that cv. Safari gave a higher effect than cv. Alaska in almost ofmarkers studied) number of air branches in plant and number of marketable tubers and number of total tubers and dry matter nand starch percentage in tubers) except N% and Ca% levels in tubers while caltivars gave no significant effect in weight of marketable tuber and boron concentration in tubers . Also the spraying with setter-2 nutrient (1.6 ml.L-1) led to give a significant effect in most of parameters studied . It was also noticed that spraying with nutrient solution (0.8 ml.L-1) gave a higher dry matter percentage and starch content in tubers while the level of nitrogen and boron was affected by spraying with nutrient (3.2 ml.L-1) significantly compare to control treatment. However , interaction between experiment factors gave a significant effect in all markers studied . | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 32 PDF Download: 5 |
||