Leaders face on the implementation of the judicial ruling

N. Hamza, Ali

doi:10.63677/jqlap.2015.114547

	Leaders face on the implementation of the judicial ruling
AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences
Article 1, Volume 6, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 258-291 PDF (0 K)
DOI: 10.63677/jqlap.2015.114547
Author
Ali N. Hamza
Abstract
Is the independence of the judiciary of the elements of the legal state, in addition to being the application of the principle of relative separation between the legislative, executive and judiciary in the contemporary state authorities, and the manifestations of independence of the judiciary implementation of judicial rulings issued by the judiciary for the benefit of individuals or management ;, especially since the judiciary is the protector of the rights of individuals and freedoms of the arbitrariness of the administration which is characterized by the privileges of public authority which is the strongest party in the event of a collision of interests between them and the individuals, but noted that the elimination of the ordinary and administrative, both in many cases issued judicial rulings fair fair individuals towards administration provisions pioneered the application of the law and its sovereignty, but it hits these verdicts judiciary not to be implemented by the private those verdicts issued against the administration department, shows that sometimes the delay in the administration on the implementation of judicial verdicts not in its favor or abstaining or being slow or implemented under-judicial decisions or abstention implicit, and sometimes explicit on the implementation of the court ruling in ways different images are using the administration of the means of public authority and sometimes issuing administrative decisions counter at other times or to withdraw the administrative decision three times or cancel the administrative decision at issue and different contents with the intent to evade the implementation of judicial verdicts not in its favor, and the resort administration to the legislature sometimes to legalize administrative decisions Cancelled by the judiciary and thus non-implementation of judicial verdicts not in its favor, and keep track of a management means also refused to carry out judicial verdicts against them, but the purpose of the face of the intransigence of the administration and its refusal to implement judicial verdicts have found ways friendly contemporary and another for the purpose of urging the administration to implement judicial verdicts in non its favor, including the following way financial pressure and the imposition of fines, some quarters neutral as well as the intervention of a modern actors are aided by the legislative authorities in control to push the administration to implement the judgments, and the arrangement on what progress has divided this research on the first two sections dedicated to the refusal administration implementation of judicial verdicts in non favor and methods that rejection while the second has made it to the ways of confronting the administration refused to implement judicial verdicts not in its favor.

Statistics Article View: 1,438 PDF Download: 336