The current research dealt with (REPRESENTATIONS OF GROTESQUE
IN THE MODERN CUBIC PAINTING -PICASSO AS A SAMPLE-
) which focuses on the pivots of modernity that are represented
by cognitive modifications in the European art and culture that
both eighth and ninth century have witnessed which contributed in
undermining the Abstmological and cultural structures of the art by
the favor of the domination of variety, strange and extraordinary …
in producing new extraordinary unprecedented ideas of Grotesque
nature interested with processes of disgracing, distortion
and strange …so the problem of the research is briefed with inciting
couple of queries of a cognitive and artistic nature which most important
are : -
1- Are these representations for the Grotesque in the modern art?
2- What are the mechanism of operating the Grotesque in the cubic
painting generally and the paintings of Picasso exclusively .
First chapter of this research included the methodical frame of the
research which included the problem , importance, need and its goal
which is represented by knowing the representations of Grotesque
in the modern cubic painting –picasso as a sample- within the limits
of the contemporary art in France for the period ( 1903-1940) also
included identifying some terms and their definition. Second chapter
was (theoretical frame) which included four sections first dealt
with ,art of Grotesque ( concept, theory and application), while the
second section includes : features of Grotesque in the modern European
painting, third section included : Cubism between dissembling
and assembling, while the fourth section dealt with : Bablo Picasso
( starts, references, destinations).
Third section dealt with procedures of the research included the
population of research is ( 25) samples , being electing similar samples
of the research’s sample intentionally are (5) samples .
The two researchers depended in analyzing the samples on descriptive
method via style of analyzing , also this research included building
the tool by it’s primary and final form.
Fourth chapter included results and conclusions of the research,
plus to recommendations and suggestions, most prominent results
got by the two researchers are:-
1- The cubic painter Picasso depended on the aesthetics of strange
in doing his works on the level of shape and content , when he
passed the familiar and constant to the modified and new extraordinary,
in order to discover the “ what is behind” of the shape that
run from the chains of the reality through re-casting the organizing
by new techniques based on distortion , ugly and extraordinary.
2- Picasso adopted extraordinary methods in producing new shapes
of a Grotesque nature via using materials and strange domestic ores
with adding ready substances by technique of sticking ( Collage) ,
to provide the viewer aesthetic areas of free playing in recruiting
and collecting and constructing, to indicate conceptual stylish and
aesthetic modification exceeds the imitation limits, and ruin the real
styles.
Most important conclusions the two researchers have come up with
are:
1- The culture of the new plastic art of cubism in it’s endeavor to
ruin the visual shape and crashing the point of vision to the level
that doesn’t let the visual phenomena except marginalized features
barely could enrich the shape nor content.
2- The desire of ruining and demolishing and not being committed
with order and harmony and natural rates are the prominent features
of cubic Grotesque paints also they are ridiculous paints mix
between scare and strangury.
In the shed of above mentioned , the two researchers suggested
that : ( Aesthetics of Grotesque in composing the post modernity)
reaching the references, appendix and shapes. |