Provisions of dhimmis in retribution In Islamic jurisprudence

Haidar Sami Abdul, MM

	Provisions of dhimmis in retribution In Islamic jurisprudence
Journal of Islamic sciences
Article 1, Volume 1, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 438-465
Author
MM Haidar Sami Abdul
Abstract
In conclusion reached on the results can be outlined as follows: 1. What is meant by the people of disclosure Almaahidon of the book of the Jews and the Christians, and was Mjriham Kalmjus in the Islamic state who give a covenant with him feel safe on their money, and display and religion. 2. unanimously agreed on the necessity of retribution on the dhimmi if a Muslim was killed, intentionally or dhimmi, and agreed on the necessity of parental dhimmi in the capital, though not his money on Aaqlth if a Muslim was killed, or dhimmi error. 3. The scholars differed in the Muslim rule if there are two views to kill dhimmi, first: Do not take revenge from the Muslim edematous, and the second: truncates it. 4. scholars differed in Alzmi rule if attacked felony without restraint on the Muslim, or edematous deliberately to two views: First, take revenge from dhimmi for a Muslim and edematous, and the second: do not take revenge for a Muslim due to the lack of similar, but should be blood money, and take revenge for invective. The error in the obligatory parental whether the victim is a Muslim, or a dhimmi. 5. scholars differed in the rule of the Muslim if attacked edematous felony without restraint to deliberately there are two views: First, do not take revenge from the Muslim dhimmi; not to reward them, and the second: take revenge from the Muslim dhimmi. As they agreed on the necessity of blood money in error.

Statistics Article View: 22 PDF Download: 8