Combining the conflicting narratives in the invasions of Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Baari

Abdullah Khalaf, Dr..

	Combining the conflicting narratives in the invasions of Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Baari
Journal of The Iraqi University
Article 1, Volume 1, Issue 31, 2016, Pages 63-118
Author
Dr.. Abdullah Khalaf
Abstract
There are many studies and researches interested in the Prophet's r rides and varied approaches and objectives, including focusing on the correct distinction of the weak, and others draw benefits and lessons, while other books dealt with the jurisprudence of biography, and other aspects of political and economic, and the garden of the Prophet's biography meets all of them what they ask, And tender at all times and when. It is well known to those who read the books of Hadith and the books of the fundamentals of jurisprudence that the method of combining the narratives with which the conflict is apparent is clearly applied to them. During my reading of Fath al-Bari's commentary on Sahih al-Bukhaari, his grandfather resorts to all the narratives which appear to contradict them, , So I tried to highlight this aspect of hope in the service of the biography of the Prophet and studies of Islamic history to remove the forms resulting from such a contradiction, and before we start to discuss this important subject must be explained the concept of conflict and the convergence of fundamentalists and modernists. The fundamentalists have known the contradiction by opposing the evidence of the Shari'ah at all, so that one of them requires that the other does not require it. There must be a place for this contradiction. It is not true that there is a contradiction between the two parts of my mind, and there is no text or consensus or measurement. Of the existence of a set of conditions to find out the inconsistencies that the two conflicting directories are equal in provenness, significance and numbers, and unite in time and place (). Ibn al-Hazm, in his book al-Haqqam, distinguished himself by saying: "In complete contradiction to the texts," al-Shati said: "If it is possible to combine, do not oppose it." And al-'Eaini and al-Mubarak al-Bukhari said. In the Hadiths, we read the following title in the book of sufficiency for the khateeb al-Baghdadi. The answer is contrary to the news, what is true is the contradiction and what is not valid. And Ibn Khuzaymah said: I do not know that it was narrated from the Prophet, but the two hadiths are true and contradictory. He has to come to him, so that I can combine them (), this is the concept of conflict between the fundamentalists and the modernists. As for the concept of pluralism among them, the fundamentalists said: It is a statement of consensus and a coalition between the forensic evidence, and to show that the difference between them is not real and does not lead to contradiction or contradiction, whether by interpretation of the parties or one of them. Their audience went on to say that the combination of conflicting evidence is what should To resort to the diligent as much as possible, and presented the combination of weighting, because of the combination of the implementation of the two conflicting guides, which is the first neglect or neglect one of them (). As for the innovators, they discussed the topic of collection in the chapter on different hadeeths, and they have two sections, one of which can be combined, and it is necessary to work on them ... and the second is not possible to combine them, so we know one of them is a scribe. First, by combining them (), and the meaning of the different talk when the modernists that there are two opposite words in the meaning apparent (). The two hadeeths, if they contradict, must be reconciled as much as possible to preserve them from contradiction (). It can be said that the beholder in the evidence if he can not reconcile it with the other evidence is not judged weak because of the inability to reconcile them, Ibn Taymiyyah said the correct evidence does not contradict but may hide the face of agreement or weakness of one of the scholars (). It can be used to prevent contradiction and conciliation or the combination of novels in the science of the Prophet's biography and Islamic history, and this is what Ibn Hajar did in his book Fath al-Bari in Bab al-Maghazi in more than sixty places in invasions and Saraya and related events. Imam Muslim (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "Gathering these narratives and meeting each other is a valid one." Narrated by the weak narrators from their antagonists, Allah ibn al-Mubarak: If you want the news to be correct, multiply each other, so the innovators have been early to compare the narratives of a specific incident. The value of this subject highlights the value of the book and the position of its scientific author, and has tried to strengthen this collection by Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) to refer to the sources of Hadith, biography and Maghazi to compare and strengthen the strength of this combination. In this research we try to collect this subject by tracking the narrations related to the invasions of the Prophet, and then stand at every touch put by Ibn Hajar in the door of reconciliation between the novels. The importance of the subject lies in the solution of many of the apparent problems that orientalists and their students are following up on the Prophet's biography under the pretext of the existence of this contradiction, but with this scientific gathering that stems from the study of the biography itself, it is reassuring to read the biography in a way that accommodates all its entrances and facts. Defending by responding to each attempt before provoking it, we offer it and treat it, and we do not wait for anyone else to diagnose it. This research has been divided into a group of mabahith that made every invasion or secrecy a title for it. The subject is a group of issues. The first intention was to do so for all the narrations of the biography, but the scope of the subject made me hesitate to discuss it in a future research group. I ask Allaah to help me complete it. . The reader is not burdened with the texts of the narratives, because such research is not likely to lengthen on the one hand, and because these narratives are referred to in their sources, they can be consulted on the other hand. I did not translate the life of Shaykh Ibn Hajar al-Asqlani to his fame and at the same time he mentioned it. At the same time, I did not define the book of Fath al-Bari as an explanation of the Sahih al-Bukhari, and thank Allah the god of everything

Statistics Article View: 185 PDF Download: 51