Summary.
That the individual Muslim if he wants to taste the sciences, and a treasure of knowledge, and dive into the depths of the evidence and Mcnunha of this debt, ill diligent was a scholar or a judge or not, it is indispensable to one of them for this science, but it is (aware of the principles of jurisprudence), for it is a machine that whereby Atkmen know how to devise legal provisions of the evidence, and through him to understand the text, and interprets speech, stop the apparent text and Khvaha, knowing the year of the Khasa, and Iasm mind for error in Alastbat. So I liked to be a part of researchers and writers in this world wide Galilee Sea. I have chosen in search of the consensus, which is one of the differences between fundamentalists entitled: (a citizen of agreement and disagreement in the fundamentalist views between the Zaidi and Hanbali the consensus), a search unsheathed from Master Bahravi message entitled: (a citizen of agreement and disagreement in the fundamentalist views between the Zaidi and Hanbali the sources of legislation Islamic and their implications), this letter was discussed, it has got a degree of excellence. This research includes some important issues in the consensus that Dar discussed between the two doctrines as they agreed or disagreed with him on these issues are and of vision or disagreed with them where the evidence of both parties and discuss them, down to the finale and the most important results that have been out in this search |