The issue of antibody at Aware of assets

Abdel - Zahra Al - Khatib, Shahid

	The issue of antibody at Aware of assets
CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC STUDIENS MAGAZINE
Article 1, Volume 8, Issue 17, 2017, Pages 107-142 PDF (0 K)
Author
Shahid Abdel - Zahra Al - Khatib
Abstract
Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds, and prayers and peace be upon the most honorable of all creatures, Muhammad and his good and pure family, and the constant curse on their enemies from the first and the other to the Day of Judgment. After. . The question of the opposite of the deep and delicate issues which are the subject of disagreement and dispute in all its aspects between the fundamentalists, they differed that the matter is something to forbid against him or not, they differed in the matter is it for the duty or scarcity, and whether the duty is simple or complex, And those who say the need for a word on different parts in kind or partial or adoption in the sense in particular and the adoption in the sense of the most general, and those who require the meaning of the meaning of the mental requirement in the sense of mental entanglement, and differed in the prohibition on the issue Is it forbidden Mallawi by the street or is forbidden to follow, They divided the ant in the matter into a special one It is one of the opposites existential and against the general is the Turk, and some said: The conflict in the public and private conflict, there is no dispute in the absence of the need to forbid him, and others said that the conflict in the private antibody, and the general, there is no dispute in the significance of the command to forbid him. They also differed on the fundamentalism of the issue and whether it is one of the fundamental issues of the mind or the verbal, or is a matter of words or jurisprudence or is one of the principles of ratification or principles of jurisprudence. And differed in the fruit of the matter between those who deny it and those who say it in the private antagonism in the health and corruption of worship as required, and those who differed between those who say nullity of worship, whether it is forbidden or forbidden, and between the author of the validity of worship on both the appropriate and not, They differed in correcting the worship of those who say that it is invalid on all parts, correcting the matter with the intention of the owners, correcting the matter with the intention of nature, which is canceled of all particulars, and correcting it with or without order. And how it was controversial in all its aspects. The second section included the introduction of the definition of the subject of the research (the question of the opposite). It also included the definition of the terms of the question in the language and the terminology of the fundamentalists based on the language books and the fundamentalist dictionaries and the definitions of the fundamentalists. Between the fourth and eighth centuries, and to indicate their differences of opinion on the issue as necessary and not. The third section included the presentation of the views of the fundamentalists in the fundamentalism of the question of opposition by presenting three introductions. The first included the study of the fundamentality of the question, And the third in the fact that the issue of the principles of ratification or the principles of jurisprudence with an explanation of the place of disagreement in those introductions, and the fourth article ensures the liberation of the subject of conflict in the matter, which is broader subject, although the researcher deliberately abbreviated to fit the place, the researcher tried to show the conflict in the meaning The need to do something forbidden against him or against him and the general lack of it at the end of the comprehensive and concise in time and to emphasize what they went to the absence of absolutely necessary. The fifth topic is the fruit of the question and its jurisprudential applications, in order to influence the corruption and health of worship, as necessary and non-existent, and to show the emergence of this fruit in the special (existential) antibody without the general (nihilistic) antibody. The importance of research: The importance of research is reflected in several things, including: First: I took him to the issue of antagonism in all its aspects and to show the place of disagreement and conflict with it, and to show the views of the media in correcting the adamant objection in it. Secondly, knowing the opposite of the acts of worship that are not valid is permissible in the first and the second is necessary. The second view is that it is necessary to forbid a person from it. The worship of him is invalid, because the prohibition of acts of worship requires corruption, and whoever sees that the matter does not require a prohibition against him, . Thirdly: a statement of heritage and presented the matter by presenting the views of the applicants. Fourth: Emphasis on the views of the late in the matter because they go to the matter that does not require the prohibition against him at all in any way necessary, which makes worship true because Islamic law authorized, there is nothing wrong with religion. The reason for the choice of research: Many things arise on the issue of the antibody because it is an important and accurate matter, it is valid in the life of each expensive, so the researcher believes that the study of this issue because it depends on obedience to the legitimate orders must be diagnosed in order to make worship true can be approached to God Almighty.

Statistics Article View: 194 PDF Download: 67