The idea of restricting the actions of administration, of whatever kind, the provisions of the law requires the presence of regulators follow up actions, as long as they leave the provisions of legality and improbable., This applies to international management, because the focus of legitimacy is to achieve justice, law enforcement, which aims mainly to protect the rights of rights in all circumstances.
Accordingly, we understand that the intended control of the international transitional administration's actions, the extent of their obligation to respect international human rights instruments, and no censorship on the internal administrative affairs office., Especially since its activities as an authority ruling involving broad powers excel even on the powers of government, in addition to the use of military force and that the wide range of powers and authorities raises a lot of questions, about who exercised control over the protection of the rights of individuals replace those activities., and different types of controls on international transitional administration activities between self-censorship, that is prescribed by it within the taxable her territory, judicial control international, international political censorship, but the international character of the control does not mean the availability of the same mechanisms and the mandate and independence, but they differ from the international body to another, which in turn cast a shadow over influence in the supervision and effectiveness of the result. |