Evaluating the efficiency of some methods used for urea determination in serum

D. Hameedi, Mohammed; R. Hameed, Rafah

doi:10.37652/juaps.2017.141450

	Evaluating the efficiency of some methods used for urea determination in serum
Journal of University of Anbar for Pure Science
Article 9, Volume 11, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 30-42 PDF (723.86 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.37652/juaps.2017.141450
Authors
Mohammed D. Hameedi; Rafah R. Hameed
College ducation university of Samarra
Abstract
The determination of accuracy , precision and efficiency were carried out in this study , Four method were used : one of them was colorimetric (monoxam method) and three enzymatic method as kits which provided by (Biomaghreb, Biosystem, Randox) , In which the comparison between the four methods were carried out by using Relative stardard deviation –RSD%, Error percentage and variation coefficient )CV) for methods under investigation.The more accurate and consensual and efficient was wein original concentration of 50 mg /100 cm3 for methods Monnoxam the number of ready-made processed Biomaghreb companies, Biosystem's, and was more accurate and agree and accuracy to focus the original 40 mg / 100 cm3 to the way many ready-processed from its parent company Randox for used urea standard Solutions.The accuracy, precision and efficiency for the fourth method were higher at 40 mg/dl for standard urea solution , In which the RSD was 0.080% error % was 1.398% and CV was 0.197%.No significant variation were indicate for urea concentration in quality control solution by using the for the fourth method in which the error% was 2.106% , while the higher precision was indicate for the second method in which the RSD 0.001 %.

References
المظفر، سامی عبد المهدی. الکیمیاء الحیاتیة، مطبعة جامعة بغداد، 1986، ص12-13. Siddiqui,M.R.; Al-Othman, Z.A. and Rahman, N. Analytical technigues in pharmaceutical analysisiyevieu. Arabian Journal of chemistry،2013;4:16-29. Kanagas,A.S.; Swaminathan ,S. and Selvakumar, R. Quality control in clinical biochemistry. Indian Journal of clinical biochemistry. 1996;11(1):7-25. کیالی، نجیب. جودة النتائج المختبریة السریریة. مجلة التشخیص المختبری 2007، المجلد4، العدد4: ص26-31. العمری، محمد رمزی. الکیمیاء السریریة العملی، الطبعة الثانیة. هیئة المعاهد الفنیة، 2001, ص47,49,58,70,73,80,81. Zachariah, P.P.; Mathew, A.; Rajesh, R. ; Kurien, G.and Unni, V.N. Nephrotic syndrome associated with meningioma. Indian Journal of Nephrology. 2013;23(1):63-66. Annino, J.S. and Giese, R.W. , Clinical Chemistry. Principles and Procedures", 3rd Ed., Little, Brown and Company, Boston1979. Richterich, R, : clinical ehemisty. S. kargen Bascl. 1969. Karplus PA, Pearson MA, Hausinger RP: 70 Years of Crystalline Urease What Have We Learned? Acc Chem Res 1997: 30;330–337 Das, Nilanjana, Arvind M. Kayastha, and Punit K. Srivastava. "Purification and characterization of urease from dehusked pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) seeds." Phytochemistry 61.5 (2002): 513-521. الراوی، خاشع محمود وخلف الله، عبد العزیز محمد " تصمیم وتحلیل التجارب الزراعیة"، دار الکتب للنشر. جامعة الموصل 2000.‏ Bretaudiere, J.P; Phung, H.T. and Bailly, M. Direct enzymatic determination of urea in plasma and urine with a centrifugal analyzer. Clinical chemistry. 1976 Oct 1;22(10):1614-7. آل فلیح، خولة احمد. مدخل الى الکیمیاء الحیاتیة. الطبعة الثانیة، دار الکتب للطباعة والنشر، الموصل، العراق.2000. ص170،169.
Statistics Article View: 546 PDF Download: 495