Magnetic Resonance Urography Plus, Abdominal Radiograph in Acute Calculus Ureteric Obstruction

Hamed Abbas, Zeid; Abd Kadhim, Mohammed; A. Kameel Alkhuzaie, Thaair

	Magnetic Resonance Urography Plus, Abdominal Radiograph in Acute Calculus Ureteric Obstruction
Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal
Article 1, Volume 15, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 279-287 PDF (0 K)
Authors
Zeid Hamed Abbas; Mohammed Abd Kadhim; Thaair A. Kameel Alkhuzaie
Abstract
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: About 2-3% of the population experiences an attack of acute ureteric colic during their lifetime, and 67%-95% caused by ureteric calculi. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can rapidly demonstrate both the presence and the level of ureteric obstruction.] OBJECTIVE: To study the diagnostic accuracy of MRI (alone and in combination with plain abdominal radiograph) in detecting acute ureteric calculus obstruction compared to unenhanced Computed Tomography (CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross sectional comparative study was conducted on a total of 48 patients suspected to have acute ureteric calculus obstruction, at the radiology department in AL-Imamain AL-Kadhemain Medical city, during the period from March to November 2015. Patients underwent MRU then unenhanced abdominal CT, and plain abdominal radiograph. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and overall accuracy of MRU findings were obtained in comparison to CT findings regarding ureteric dilatation and its level, stone detection and perirenal fluid and fat stranding. RESULTS: Of the 48 patients imaged with both CT and MRU, 4 of them showed no evidence of obstruction on any imaging modality, and 44 of them had a final diagnosis of acute calculus ureteric obstruction. Regarding the detection of ureteric dilatation in MRU, in comparison to CT, the sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 80%, the positive predictive value (97.72%), the negative predicative value (100%), and overall accuracy (97.9%). The detection of ureteric stone by MRU (when combined with plain abdominal radiograph) in comparison to CT, the sensitivity = 95.45%, specificity = 100%, the positive predictive value (100%), the negative predicative value (66.66%), and over all accuracy (95.8%). The detection of peri-renal fluid by MRU in comparison to CT, the sensitivity = 96.66%, specificity = 72.22%, positive predictive value (85.29%), the negative predicative value (92.85%), and overall accuracy (87.5%). CONCLUSION: MRI when combined with plain abdominal radiograph was nearly as accurate as unenhanced spiral CT in acute calculus ureteric obstruction. Also the MRI was more sensitive than unenhanced CT in detecting the secondary signs of upper urinary tract obstruction, as perirenal fluid.
Keywords
KEY WORDS; abdominal radiograph; ureteric calculus

Statistics Article View: 226 PDF Download: 108