Henry Kissinger's role in managing  the Middle East crises between racism and pragmatism  ( October War model )

Alwan Lefta Al - Shuwaili, Abbas

	Henry Kissinger's role in managing the Middle East crises between racism and pragmatism ( October War model )
Al-Adab Journal
Article 1, Volume 0, Issue 125, 2018, Pages 179-200
Author
Abbas Alwan Lefta Al - Shuwaili
Abstract
The well-known American political figure, Henry, of German descent and Jewish religion, is an influential figure not only in the history of the United States, in foreign policy, but also in international politics. This influence has become a norm or a basis for the United States of America in managing conflicts and international crises. Today, the naming of the "godfather of American politics" is proof of the importance of Kissinger's role in the administration and manufacture of US foreign policy. We have therefore decided to shed light on the research and analysis of this important and controversial figure with regard to its origins and religion as well as its ideas and wisdom that contributed to making the United States run the world as a whole. We have chosen a model through which we can describe or deal with these forms or contradictions in this character by the title "Henry Kissinger's role in managing the crises of the Middle East between racism and pragmatism" in an attempt to identify this character and the most important ideas that derive from it US policymakers are most of their political ideas. Kissinger preferred American pragmatism as a national security adviser and US secretary of state to the detriment of his Jewish religion and racism according to the American point of view. This was reflected on several occasions during the October war, as we noted in the context of the research, in the sense that he did not represent the racist policy practiced by Israel at the expense of others By means of various means, as accused by a number of sources, but was the US strategy in the Middle East, which is the issue of security of Israel one of the most important priorities of this strategy, but this priority should not be at the expense of national security and the interests of the United States United in various regions of the world, especially in the Middle East, which is important in its location and rich in its resources.

Statistics Article View: 103 PDF Download: 56