H. NAJI, M. (2012). STUDY OF ADSORPTION METHYLENE BLUE DYE FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS BY ATTAPULGITE CLAY BY THE BATCH AND THE COLUMN METHOD. , 3(3), 146-151. doi: 10.37652/juaps.2009.15625
MOUHANND H. NAJI. "STUDY OF ADSORPTION METHYLENE BLUE DYE FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS BY ATTAPULGITE CLAY BY THE BATCH AND THE COLUMN METHOD". , 3, 3, 2012, 146-151. doi: 10.37652/juaps.2009.15625
H. NAJI, M. (2012). 'STUDY OF ADSORPTION METHYLENE BLUE DYE FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS BY ATTAPULGITE CLAY BY THE BATCH AND THE COLUMN METHOD', , 3(3), pp. 146-151. doi: 10.37652/juaps.2009.15625
H. NAJI, M. STUDY OF ADSORPTION METHYLENE BLUE DYE FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS BY ATTAPULGITE CLAY BY THE BATCH AND THE COLUMN METHOD. , 2012; 3(3): 146-151. doi: 10.37652/juaps.2009.15625

STUDY OF ADSORPTION METHYLENE BLUE DYE FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS BY ATTAPULGITE CLAY BY THE BATCH AND THE COLUMN METHOD

Journal of University of Anbar for Pure Science
Article 37, Volume 3, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 146-151    PDF (605.3 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.37652/juaps.2009.15625
Author
MOUHANND H. NAJI*
University of Kufa / College of Science
Abstract
In this work a study was carried out to estimate the ability of Attapulgite clay as a new adsorbent for
adsorption and removal of Methylene Blue dye from aqueous solutions. At first, the batch method was used to
determine the best adsorption ratio from the concentration used of Methylene Blue dye between (50-10 mg/L), and
the result show that the best concentration of dye was (10 mg/L) and the adsorption ratio was (86.28%). The shaking
time that it equal to (35 min.) and the best pH value that give better adsorption ratio was (8). The effect of
temperature and thermodynamic functions wear also studied and found that the adsorption ratio was increased with
increased the temperature and the reaction was endothermic. After fixing the best conditions for the adsorption, the
column method was used and the adsorption ratio was equal to (88.16%)
Keywords
methylene blue
References
  1. A. P. Mcginn; J. State of The World, 3, (2002), P.17.
  2. G. Baughman and T. A. Perenich; Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 7, (1988), P.183.
  3. E. Forgacs, T. Cserhati and G. Oros, Environ. Int., 30, (2004), P.953.
  4. V. Golob, A. Vinder and M. Simonc, Dyes. Pigments, 67, (2005), P.93.
  5. I. Arvanitoyannis, I. Eleftheriadis and E. Tsatsaroni; Chemosphere, 18, (1989), P.1707.
  6. N. Nyholm, B. N. Jacobsen, B. M. Pedersen, O. Poulsen, A. Damborg and B. Schultz; Water Resources, 26, (1994), P.339.
  7. P. Mavros, A. C. Daniilidou, N. K. Lazaridis and L. Stergiou; Flotation. Environ. Techol, 15, (1994), P.601.
  8. G. Mckay, G. Ramprasad and F. P. Mosli; Watew, Air and Soil Poll., 114, (1999), P.423.
  9. I. Arvanitoyannis, I. Eleftheriadis and E. Kavlentis; Chemosphere, 16, (1987), P.2523.
  10. M. Zhu, Y. Li, M. Xie and H. Xin, J. Hazard. Mater., 120, (2005), P.163.
  11. L. Davis and C. Randal; J. WPCF, 50, (1978), P.382.
  12. A. A. S. Al-Zayadi, M. Sc. Thesis, Babylon University (2006).
  13. A. Ghaffar; EJEAFChe, 5(2), (2006), P.1286.
  14. F. W. Fifield and D. Kealey; Principles and Practice of Analytical Chemistry, Blackwell Science Ltd., New York, (2000), P.85.
  15. M. Alfred;Physical Pharmacy, 4th edition, Texas University Press, Texas, (1993), P.125.
  16. T. H. Kim, C. Park, J. Yank and S. Kim; J. Hazard Mater, 9, (2004), P.95.
  17. Y. Ma, Y. Xia, X. Yang and M. Ym; Sheng. Wu. Yi., 20(2), (2003), P.311.
 

Statistics
Article View: 361
PDF Download: 298


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com