Detection of similarity and genetic distance between Iraqi chicken varieties and different standard strains

Detection of similarity and genetic distance between Iraqi chicken varieties and different standard strains

Th.A. Ezzulddin¹, Dh.M. Jwher² and S.A. Dabdoub³

Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq

Email: ¹ [email protected], ² [email protected], ³ [email protected]

Abstract

Forty-eight wing vein blood samples were collected from different locations of poultry rearing farms and back yard chickens of Nineveh governorate from the of local and exotic chicken. The chicken divided into twelve groups four birds each according to colors and phenotype for the local and exotic chicken respectively. Blood DNA was extracted and amplified by thermocycler apparatus and the electrophoresis was done using 1.2% agarose gel for DNA bands exhibiting. The results showed high genetic similarity within the local chickens ranged between 0.78- 0.96 at an average of 0.88, while it ranged between 0.73- 0.86 at an average of 0.78 in exotic breeds. The degree of similarity between Iraqi and exotic breeds was 0.74-0.88 at average of 0.80. The calculated average of differences among each of Iraqi and exotic chickens and in between were 0.12, 0.22 and 0.20, respectively. However, the genetic distance within the local chicken, exotic breed and in between them was 0.128, 0.24 and 0.21 respectively. The study concluded that the genetic similarity was higher within local chicken groups than those of exotic breeds.

Keywords: RAPD-PCR, Polymorphism, Genetic similarity, Genetic distance, Iraqi chicken

DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2019.126109.1235, ©2020, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul.

This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

الکشف عن التشابه والبعد الوراثی بین أنواع الدجاج العراقی والسلالات القیاسیة الأجنبیة

ثامر عبد العزیز عز الدین، ضیاء محمد طاهر جوهر و سفیان عبد العزیز دبدوب

فرع الصحة العامة البیطریة، کلیة الطب البیطری، جامعة الموصل، الموصل، العراق

الخلاصة

جمعت 48 عینة دم من الورید الجناحی من مناطق مختلفة شملت مزارع الدواجن ودجاج التربیة المنزلیة فی محافظة نینوى. قسمت العینات الى اثنتا عشر مجموعة اعتمادا على الشکل المظهری واللون للدجاج المحلی والأجنبی، احتوت کل مجموعة على أربعة طیور. استخلص الحامض النووی الرایبوزی منقوص الأوکسجین (الدنا) وتم تضخیمه باستخدام جهاز المبلمر الحراری، وتم إظهار حزم الدنا بالترحیل على هلام الأکاروز بترکیز 1.2%. أظهرت النتائج وجود تشابه وراثی عالی ضمن أنواع الدجاج المحلی والتی تراوحت بین 0.78- 0.96 بمتوسط 0.88 فی حین تراوحت بین 0.73- 0.86 بمتوسط 0.78 فی السلالات الأجنبیة، وبلغت نسبة التشابه بین الدجاج المحلی والأجنبی 0.74-0.88 بمتوسط 0.80. وکان متوسط الاختلاف بین مجامیع الدجاج المحلی والمجامیع الأجنبیة بین 0.12، 0.22، 0.20 على التوالی، وبلغ البعد الوراثی بین المجامیع المحلیة والأجنبیة وفیما بینهما 0.128، 0.24 و 0.21 على التوالی. خلصت الدراسة إلى أن التشابه الوراثی داخل المجامیع المحلیة اعلى من التشابه بین مجامیع السلالات الأجنبیة.

Introduction

Over the last twenty-five years, molecular markers have been utilized to distinguish the different species of chicken. Before the biochemical and molecular markers were identified, the chicken species and varieties were characterized by phenotypic and quantitative traits value (1).

Molecular genetics has enabled opportunities to develop animal breeding programs by direct selection of genomic regions that serve economic traits (2).

Finding out the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) had a great effect on the research eukaryotic genome and shared in the development and enforcement of various DNA markers (3).

The randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique was described first by (4,5), is a rapid and effective procedure that can be used to produce genotype specific banding patterns. Polymorphism of RAPD fragments is detected as a band’s presence or absence and may result from deletion, insertion or differences in the nucleotide sequences in or between priming regions (6).

RAPD is an easy, quick and relatively low-cost screening that uses short oligonucleotide primers of arbitrary sequences to magnify anonymous fragments of genomic DNA (7).

Genetic information gives a unified approach for the variation within and between populations, which is affected by neither the environmental conditions nor the developmental stages of organisms.

Vanhala et al. (8) and Corzo et al. (9) denoted the usefulness of molecular information in the evaluation of the genetic variation and divergence. The Iraqi native chickens consist of different varieties descended from the red jungle fowl which mixed with different standard important strains, it is characterized by low egg production and body weight, but it is known by its resistance to diseases and extreme environmental conditions (10).

The objective of this study was to evaluate the genetic variability in a six breeder groups of the local chicken in Mosul city and the vicinity, which were divided according to the color (white, brown, black, black with white and naked neck, and mixed of colors) compared with New Hampshire, Japanese Bantam (chabo) Leghorn and cochin chicken based on RAPD-DNA markers, to generate genetic information on the local chicken structure for future development strategies.

Materials and methods

Chicken groups

This work consists of twelve deferent groups of local chicken and exotic standard strains as shown below. A total of 48 individuals of four from each type was utilized.

G1: Black G7: Leghorn                                                              

G2: Black and White G8: Silkie

G3: White                                                          Local G9

G4: Mixed colors G10: Cochin                  Broiler breeder

G5: Naked neck G11: Indian Shamo

G6: Brown G12: New Hampshire

      DNA isolation

Blood samples were collected into 5 ml tubes containing EDTA. Genomic DNAs were obtained from blood samples (collected from wing vein) as described by Macrogen Company Kit. The purity and concentration of DNA samples were checked by the Nano Drop® spectrophotometer. The same quantities of DNA from the birds of each group were mixed to perform the representative DNA.

DNA amplification and electrophoresis condition

Amplification reactions were carried out in a final volume of 20 µl (Table 1).

Table 1: Amplification reactions

Amplification was achieved in a thermo cycler programmed for 10 min initial denaturation at 95 ºC, then 40 cycles of 30 s at 95 ºC, 30 s at 34 ºC, 60 s at 72 ºC, and 5 min final extension at 72 ºC.

Agarose gel electrophoresis

1.2% agarose gel (Jena Bioscience, Germany). Loading 6 µl of each PCR product. The electrophoresis was carried out at 3V/cm for 1 hour using power supply MP 300V (Major Science, UK) containing 1X TBE buffer (GeNetBio, Korea). A 1kb bp DNA marker, 4 µl (Promega, USA) was used as a standard molecular weight marker.

Gel documentation

The gel was stained in a 200 ml solution containing ethidium bromide 0.5 µg/ml and subsequently examined under UV light using the gel documentation system (BioDocAnalyze, Germany).

Statistical Analysis

To estimate the number of polymorphic and monomorphic bands. Bands were scored visually on the bases of their presence 1 or absence 0. Genetic similarity (GS) was calculated using the following equation (11): GS= 2Nab / Na+Nb.

Were Nab represent the entrant bands between the groups a and b. Na+ Nb the total scrod bands for the same groups. Genetic polymorphism between groups was resolved as GP= 1- GS. Genetic distance was evaluated as (12): GD= -In(S). The phylogenetic tree was obtained on the base of genetic similarity using the SPSS Program (classify procedure).

Results

RAPD-PCR method was followed to study the genetic similarity and genetic distance of Iraqi local chicken and some imported exotic breeds. Nine random decanucleotide primers of the sequences, GC content and Tm ºC (table 2). A total of 60 loci included forty percentage of polymorphism were obtained.

The table 3, indicates the similarity and the differences between different chicken groups. The results expressed high homogeneity among Iraqi chicken groups which were varied from 0.78 to 0.96 with an average of 0.88, while it ranged from 0.73 to 0.86 with middling 0.78 in the analogous exotic breeds. The similarity between the Iraqi local chicken versus pooled foreign groups was ranged from 0.74to 0.88 with a median of 0.80.

The highest genetic similarity within Iraqi chicken was found between G1and G3 (the white and the black chicken groups) which was 0.96, while the lowest genetic similarity detected between G2 and G6 groups (black and white and brown) and was 0.78. On the other hand, the highest degree of similarity between the Iraqi and exotic chicken groups occurred between G3 and G9 and was 0.88, and the lowest degree noticed between G5 and G10 of value 0.75. The calculated average of differences within each of Iraqi and exotic chickens and in between were 0.12, 0.22 and 0.20, respectively.

Figure 1 shows the pattern of PCR product using the primer opp-17, clarify a part of genetic variation among the studied groups in eleven genetic loci included three of polymorphism bands. Concerning genetic distance which depends on the similarity degree, table (4) showed the genetic distance in calculated groups. The lowest genetic distance was found between G1 and G3 of Iraqi chicken and the farthest genetic distance was existed between the Silkie (Japanese mini chicken) and the Cochin (Huge Asian Chicken). The largest genetic distance among the whole chicken groups in this study was found between G8 and G11 of value 0.31. As for the relationship between Iraqi and foreign chicken groups, the minimum genetic distance found between G3 and G9 was 0.13, and the highest genetic distance represented between G5 and G10 was 0.29. The overall genetic distance within each of the local, standard strains of chicken, and in between was 0.128, 0.24, 0.215, respectively.

Table 2: Genetic polymorphism analysis based on the primers used

Table 3: Genetic similarity and genetic variation values between chicken groups

*The numbers above the axis represent the differences and the numbers below the axis represent the similarity

Table 4: Genetic distance values between chicken groups