- All Journals
- Al-Qadisiyah University
- Basrah University
- Kirkuk University
- Mosul University
- The Iraqi Borad for Medical Specialization
- University of Anbar
- University of Technology
- Al Mustafa University
- Al-Zahraa University for Women
- Alnoor University
- Kunooz University
- Misan University
- Ninevah University
- Tikrit University
- University of Al-Hamdaniya
- University of Kerbala
Viability of utilizing the global methods for assessing the sustainability of urban design projects in Iraq | ||
| Kerbala Journal for Engineering Sciences (KJES) | ||
| Article 2, Volume 0, Issue 1, 2020, Pages 1-13 PDF (874.75 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.63463/kjes902 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Raed Fawzi Mohammed Ameen; Saba Jabbar Kadhum Almayyahi | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Due to rapid urbanization, cities and urban areas become responsible for about two- thirds of CO2 and the GHG emissions, as well as the depletion of different types of energies and natural resources. The sustainable of urban development may be considered a fundamental solution which can achieve the balance between human needs and nature. Furthermore, it facilitates the dealing with urban design challenges for the long term. It also encourages local community engagement in the design process through different stages, as well as contributing to decision-making to create sustainability of urban design. From this vision, many global assessment tools were emerged and have been used in different countries around the world. This paper aims to clarify the viability of using well-known methods to assess the urban design projects in Iraq and the suitability of local realities. The proper conduct analysis of current situations based on an in-depth critical review and a comprehensive comparison among three well-known urban sustainability assessment methods, namely: BREEAM Communities from the UK, LEED-ND from US, and PEARLS Communities from the UAE (as a neighbouring country to Iraq). The study conducted an in-depth qualitative and quantitative analysis of the main evaluation criteria for the selected tools, such as content use, the weighting system, scoring, certificate rating, and the context. The key findings stressed that the global assessment tools in used, are focusing on the sustainability assessment of the local context and dealt with the local urban challenges. Therefore, they cannot be generalized to be global tools that can be used anywhere, especially for urban design and development projects in Iraq. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Global assessment tools; Urban Sustainability; common indicators; urban challenges; Urban Design | ||
| References | ||
|
1. Ameen, R. F. M. A framework for the sustainability assessment of urban design and development in Iraqi cities. PhD Thesis, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. 2017. 2. Ameen, R. F. M., ALyasari, H. I., and Altaweel, M. D. Stakeholders’ perceptions of social and economic challenges in adopting sustainable urban development in post-war countries. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 2020: 671:012127. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012127. License CC BY 3.0. 3. Ameen, R. F. M.,Li, H. and Mourshed, M. Sustainability assessment methods of urban design: a review. In: The 21st International Workshop: Intelligent Computing in Engineering, 2014 (ISBN: 978-0-9930807-0-8). UK. European Group for Intelligince Computing in Engeneering (EG- ICE), 4. Gil, J. and Duarte, J. P. Tools for evaluating the sustainability of urban design: a review. Proceedings of the ICE - Urban Design and Planning 166(6), 2013, pp. 311-325. 5. Ameen, R. F. M., and Mourshed, M. Urban environmental challenges in developing countries—A stakeholder perspective. Habitat International 64(2017):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.002. 6. Cable, F. SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOOD RATING SYSTEMS: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON. In: CEU Climate Change and Urban Design Oslo, Norway. Council for European Urbanism, 2008, pp. 301-335. 7. Haapio, A. Towards sustainable urban communities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 32(1), 2012, pp. 165-169. 8. Ameen, R. F. M., and Mourshed, M. Environmental, Social and Economic Challenges for Urban zDevelopment: Stakeholder's Perception in a Developing Economy. In: The 16th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering 2016, ICCCBE2016 (ISBN: 978-4-9907371-2-2), At: Osaka, Japan. 9. Shen, L.-Y.,Jorge Ochoa, J.,Shah, M. N. and Zhang, X. The application of urban sustainability indicators – A comparison between various practices. Habitat International 35(1), 2011, pp. 17-29. 10. CIDA. Indicators for Sustainability: How cities are monitoring and evaluating their success. Ottawa: Canadian International Development Agency, 2012. 11. Turcu, C. Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56(5), 2013, pp. 695-719. 12. Bond, A.,Morrison-Saunders, A. and Pope, J. Sustainability assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 2012, 30(1), pp. 53-62. 13. UN. Our Common Future- Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. England, 1987. 14. BRE. BREEAM Communities Technical Manual. SD202- 0.1: 2012. Code for a Sustainable Built Environment. UK, 2013. 15. BRE. BREEAM Communities Assessor Manual Development Planning Application. UK: BREEAM, 2009. 16. BRE. BREEAM for Communities: Stage 2 SD5065 Technical Guidance Manual: Version 1. UK, 2011. 17. USGBC. LEED 2009 for Neighborhood Development- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), 2011. 18. Estidama. The Pearl Rating System for Estidama. Villa Rating System Design & Construction. Version 1.0. UAE: Abo Dubi Urban Plannng Council, 2010. 19. Tanguay, G. A.,Rajaonson, J.,Lefebvre, J.-F. and Lanoie, P. Measuring the sustainability of cities: An analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecological Indicators 10(2), 2010, pp. 407-418. 20. Wedding, G. C. and Crawford-Brown, D. Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: a focus on sustainability and green building. J Environ Manage 85(2), 2007, pp. 483-495. 21. Behzadfar, M. and Abdi, F. Urban Sustainability Indicators Assessment with the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A comparison between different examples. Journal of Social Issues & Humanities 2013: 1(3). 22. Häkkinen, T. Assessment of indicators for sustainable urban construction. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 24(4), 2007, pp. 247-259. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 3,904 PDF Download: 694 |
||