Influence of Nanocermic on Some Properties of Polyetheretherketone Based Biocomposites

Mohammed, Alaa A.; Oleiwi, Jawad K.; Al-Hassani, Emad S.

doi:10.30684/etj.v38i8A.703

	Influence of Nanocermic on Some Properties of Polyetheretherketone Based Biocomposites
Engineering and Technology Journal
Article 4, Volume 38, 8A, 2020, Pages 1126-1136 PDF (1.95 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30684/etj.v38i8A.703
Authors
Alaa A. Mohammed^* ; Jawad K. Oleiwi; Emad S. Al-Hassani
Department of Materials Engineering, University of Technology-Iraq,
Abstract
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) materials belong to a group of high-performance thermoplastic polymers thermoplastic that has been proposed as a substitute for metals in biomaterials. In this research, in order to improve the performances of PEEK, nano titanium dioxide (n-TiO2) and nano-hydroxyapatite (n-HAp) were incorporated into PEEK loading up to (1.5 wt%) to fabricate PEEK composites by using a method of melt-blending and hot compressing. Properties, such as compression, density, the morphology of fracture, and element analysis were examined for preparing samples. The results showed that the compression and density properties improved with increased weight fraction for two types of reinforcement, but the higher values obtained at (1.5 wt%) for two types of powders. It was found the higher compression strength and compression modulus obtained when reinforced with (1.5% n-HAp) which equal to (107.632 MPa and 3.991 GPa) respectively, than for samples reinforced with (1.5% n-TiO2) which equal to (91.579 MPa and 3.123GPa) respectively, while the density results have opposite behavior, it was found the higher values obtained when reinforced with (n-TiO2) than for samples reinforced with (n-HAp) and at (1.5% n-TiO2) the higher density, which equal to (1.3656) while at (1.5% n-HAp) which equal to (1.3425). Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) manifested, that the fracture morphology transferred from brittle to ductile when reinforced with nano particles. Also, EDS analysis elucidated an identically uniform distribution of n-TiO2 and n-HAp
Keywords
Polyetheretherketone; Titanium dioxide; Hydroxyapatite; Nano ceramic; Biomedical implants

References
[1] P.I. Brånemark, R. Adell, U. Breine, B.O. Hansson, J. Lindström and A. Ohlsson, “Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses, i. experimental studies,” Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 81–100, 1696. [2] A. Sicilia, S. Cuesta, G. Coma, I. Arregui, C. Guisasola, E. Ruiz and A.Maestro, “Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients,” Clin. Oral Implants Res., Vol. 19, Issue 8, pp. 823–835, 2008. [3] D.M. Devine, J. Hahn, R.G. Richards, H. Gruner, R.Wieling and S.G. Pearce, “Coating of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone implants with titanium to improve bone apposition,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., Vol. 101B, Issue 4, pp. 591–598, 2013. [4] A.D. Schwitalla, M. Abou-Emara, T. Spintig, J. Lackmann and W.D. Müller, “Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of peek dental implants on the peri-implant bone,” J. Biomech., Vol. 48, Issue 1, pp. 1–7, 2015. [5] M. Esposito, J.M. Hirsch, U. Lekholm and P. Thomson, “Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants,” II. Etiopathogenesis, Eur. J. Oral Sci., Vol. 106, Issue 1, pp. 721–764, 1998. [6] Z. Özkurt and E. Kazazoğlu, “Zirconia dental implants: a literature review,” J. Oral. Implantol,Vol. 37, Issue 3, pp. 367–376, 2011. [7] Z. Özkurt and E. Kazazoğlu, “Clinical Success of Zirconia in dental applications,”J. Prosthodont, Vol.19, Issue 1, pp. 64–68, 2010. [8] D.R. Cruvinel, R.E. Silveria, R. Galo, C.C. Alandia-Román,F.C.P. Pries-de-Souza, H. Panzeri, “Analysis of stress and fracture strength of zirconia implants after cyclic loading,” Mater. Res., Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 1082–1088, 2015. [9] C.L. Chang, C.S. Chen, T.C. Yeung and M.L. Hsu, “Biomechanical effect of a zirconia dental implant-crown system: a three-dimensional finite element analysis,” Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, Vol. 27, Issue 4, pp, 49–57, 2011. [10] K. Ozeki, T. Masuzawa and H. Aoki, “Fabrication of hydroxyapatite thin films on polyetheretherketone substrates using a sputtering technique,” Materials Science and Engineering C, Vol. 72 , pp. 576–582, 2017. [11] M. S. Scholz, J. P. Blanchfield, L. D. Bloom, B. H. Coburn, M. Elkington, J. D. Fuller, M. E. Gilbert, S. A. Muflahi, M. F. Pernice, S. I. Rae, J. A. Trevarthen, S. C. White, P. M. WeaverI and I. P. Bond, “The use of composite materials in modern orthopaedic medicine and prosthetic devices: areview,” Compos Sci Technol , Vol. 71, Issue 16, pp. 1791–803, 2011. [12] A. Jonas, R. Legras and J.P. Issi, “Differential scanning calorimetry and infra-red crystallinity determinations of Poly (aryl ether ether ketone),” Polymer, Vol. 32, pp. 3364–3370, 1991. [13] A. Godara, D. Raabe and S. Green, “The Influence of sterilization processes on the micromechanical properties of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK composites for bone implant applications,” Acta Biomaterialia, Vol.3, pp. 209–220, 2007. [14] D.J. Jaekel, D.W. Macdonald and S.M. Kurtz, “Characterization of PEEK biomaterials using the small punch test,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, Vol. 4, pp. 1275–1282, 2011.
Statistics Article View: 374 PDF Download: 258