Edan, H., Al-Abaied, A., Abd Al-Hameed, A. (2020). COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF MOBILE DRIP IRRIGATION AND SUB-SURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION USING NANOTECHNOLOGY IN THE GROWTH AND YIELD BROAD BEEN (VICIA FABA L.). , 18(2), 216-229. doi: 10.32649/aagrs.2022.170527
H. H. Edan; A. I. Al-Abaied; A. M. Abd Al-Hameed. "COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF MOBILE DRIP IRRIGATION AND SUB-SURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION USING NANOTECHNOLOGY IN THE GROWTH AND YIELD BROAD BEEN (VICIA FABA L.)". , 18, 2, 2020, 216-229. doi: 10.32649/aagrs.2022.170527
Edan, H., Al-Abaied, A., Abd Al-Hameed, A. (2020). 'COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF MOBILE DRIP IRRIGATION AND SUB-SURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION USING NANOTECHNOLOGY IN THE GROWTH AND YIELD BROAD BEEN (VICIA FABA L.)', , 18(2), pp. 216-229. doi: 10.32649/aagrs.2022.170527
Edan, H., Al-Abaied, A., Abd Al-Hameed, A. COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF MOBILE DRIP IRRIGATION AND SUB-SURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION USING NANOTECHNOLOGY IN THE GROWTH AND YIELD BROAD BEEN (VICIA FABA L.). , 2020; 18(2): 216-229. doi: 10.32649/aagrs.2022.170527

COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF MOBILE DRIP IRRIGATION AND SUB-SURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION USING NANOTECHNOLOGY IN THE GROWTH AND YIELD BROAD BEEN (VICIA FABA L.)

Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Article 6, Volume 18, Issue 2, 2020, Pages 216-229    PDF (1.48 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.32649/aagrs.2022.170527
Authors
H. H. Edan; A. I. Al-Abaied; A. M. Abd Al-Hameed
Abstract
A field study was carried out in clay loam soil that classified into Typic Torrifluret in Ramadi city (College of Agriculture- University Of Anbar) during the fall season of 2018 in order to compare mobile drip irrigation with under surface drip irrigation by using Nano-Root guard drippers and their effects in physical properties and water consumption of bean as well as, the study targeted determination of water use efficiency using Najeeb Kharoofa equation depending on crop coefficient that obtained from recent researches and weather data of experiment location. All agricultural practices were done as recommended and the experiment was laid out as RCBD with three replications of each irrigation system. Seeds of bean (cv. Veto) were sown in 20th of October 2018 and the harvest time was in 13th of March 2019. Irrigation dates were at 50% depletion of available water according to evaporation pan Bean productivity was significantly increased at under surface drip irrigation with 7.71-ton ha-1 in comparison with 6.32-ton ha-1 that obtained from mobile drip irrigation. The difference were significant between water use consumption values that were calculated according to Najeeb Kharoofah equation and between data collected from evaporation pan, however it was 148.48 mm by Najeeb Kharoofah equation while it was 446 mm according to evaporation pan data. Regarding the method of irrigation, they were affected. The effect was clear in the mobile drip irrigation compared to sub-surface drip irrigation as the evaporation rate was higher. However, the average of soil water content average for the three replications along growing season was 21.75% while it was 24.96% in the sub-surface drip irrigation.
Keywords
Irrigation Mobile Irrigaton; Nano-Root guard; Sub Surface; Broad been
References
  1. AL- Khalil, I.L. (2000). Irrigation and puncture. remake. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. Doctoral dissertation, University of Mosul, pp. 34‏.
  2. Al-Saeedi, S. N. (1992). A physiological study of the salt tolerance of four varieties of wheat. MSc Thesis, University of Basra, pp. 54.
  3. Al-Obeid, A. A. (2011). The manufacture of a mobile drip irrigation system. the Ministry of Higher Education, Iraq, pp. 4-6.
  4. Al-Rahi, S.H., and Abd al-Wahhab A. S. (2014). Soil fertility, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Department of Soil and Water Resources Sciences - College of Agriculture - University of Baghdad, pp. 56-58.
  5. Al-Sayed, A. M. (2012). Agricultural Technology and Development in the Arab World Amman - Jordan, pp. 61-66.
  6. Ali, H. J., and Ahmad I. J. (1990). Pulses crops, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Department of Field Crops, College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad, pp. 44-47.
  7. . Ali, Nooruddin Anbar - a model) Al-Mustansiriya Center's Journal for Arab and International Studies, Issue (43), pages 132-158.
  8. Issa, A. T. (1990). Crop plant biology. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, University of Baghdad, pp. 121-125.
  9. Ayoub, M. N., Adnan Y. R., and Al-Khatib K. (2014). The guide for teaching agricultural extension workers Amman, Jordan, pp. 13-15.
  10. Abdel Fattah, N. F. (2013). The effect of water scarcity in the Euphrates River on agricultural production in Iraq (Anbar Governorate-a model). AL-Mostansiriyah journal for arab and international studies, (43):132-158.
  11. Abdul-Jabbar, M. S. (2016). Comparison of the performance of mobile drip and continuous torrential irrigation in some water parameters, physical properties of soil, and wheat yield: L. Triticum aestivum. Doctoral dissertation, University of Anbar, pp. 66.
  12. Adeniran, k.A., Amodu, M.F. Amodu, M.O. and Adeniji. F.A. (2010). Requirements of some selected crops in kamp dam irrigation project. Australian journal of Agricultural Engineering,1 (4): 119-125
  13. Craciun, I., & Craciun, M. (1999). Water and nitrogen use efficiency under limited water supply for maize to increase land productivity. Crop yield response to deficit irrigation, Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, 84: 87-94.‏
  14. Doorenbos, J. (1977). Crop water requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper, 24.‏
  15. Han, M., Zhao, C., Feng, G., Yan, Y., & Sheng, Y. (2015). Evaluating the effects of mulch and irrigation amount on soil water distribution and root zone water balance using HYDRUS-2D. Water, 7(6): 2622-2640.‏
  16. Abd AL-Gabbar, M. S., & Al-Abaied, A. A. W. I. (2016). Compared to the modified pivot irrigation and irrigation Alchrista in some water standards for soil and yield of wheat. Triticum aestivum L. Anbar journal of agricultural sciences, 14(1): 41-55.‏
  17. Olaposi, O. I., Joshua, A. I., & Yusuf, A. (2017). Development of nano irrigation system with clay diaphragm for reduced water loss in vegetable production in low income countries. Revista Espinhaço/UFVJM, 21-28.‏
  18. Proffitt, A. P. B., Berliner, P. R., & Oosterhuis, D. M. (1985). A Comparative Study of Root Distribution and Water Extraction Efficiency by Wheat Grown Under High‐and Low‐Frequency Irrigation 1. Agronomy Journal, 77(5), 655-662.‏
  19. Saleem, M.; A. Waqas; and R.N. Ahmad. (2010). Comparison of three wheat varieties with different irrigation systems for water productivity. International Journal of Agriculture and Applied Sciences, 2(1): 7-10.
  20. Shehata, A. A. A. (2009). Comparison among different irrigation systems for deficit-irrigated corn in the Nile Valley. CIGR Journal, 11 :1-25.
  21. Smith, M., Kivumbi, D., & Heng, L. (2002). Use of the FAO CROPWAT model in deficit irrigation studies.
  22. Whitehead, F. H. (1963). Experimental studies of the effect of wind on plant growth and anatomy. III. Soil moisture relations. The New Phytologist, 62(1): 80-85.
Statistics
Article View: 1,488
PDF Download: 358


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com