Halliday’s Perspective of Modality in Iraqi EFL Learners’ Essays

Rasheed, Awham

doi:10.37654/aujll.2021.171147

	Halliday’s Perspective of Modality in Iraqi EFL Learners’ Essays
Anbar University Journal of Languages and Literature
Article 15, Volume 13, Issue 3, September 2021, Pages 331-351 PDF (769.57 K)
DOI: 10.37654/aujll.2021.171147
Author
Awham Rasheed
Abstract
The present study attempts to investigate the function of modality in the Iraqi EFL learners’ essays at the college level based on discourse analysis theories It aims to identify the EFL University students' competence and knowledge of the types of modality and use them in writing to reach a high level of persuasion, hence, characterizing Iraqi learners’ peculiar communicative style. To achieve this aim, the study adopts Halliday’s (1985/1994) modal of SFG (Systemic Functional Grammar) to render a statistic of modality types, whereby thirty essays are chosen randomly as data of this study, Writing Essay Material, Third Year Class, English Department, College of Education for Humanities, University of Anbar, 2018-2019. The finding of the study reveals that since the subject under analysis is argumentative, students are free to use the types of modality, therefore, the types of modality are vital to help students express their opinions in persuasive way. This refers to the vital communicative value of modality types.
Keywords
Modality; Halliday’s 1985 SFG; Writing Essays

References
References Anson, A., Chris M. and Robert A. (2011). The Longman handbook for writers and readers (6^th ed). Longman. New York. Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic Approach. In Johns, M. Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishing. New Jersey. 91-102. Halliday, M. K. E. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Adward Arnold press. London. Halliday, M. A. K. and Christian M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3^rd ed). Hodder Arnold press. London. Al-Haq, F., & Al-Sobh, M. A. (2010). The effect of a web-based writing instructional EFL program on enhancing the performance of Jordanian secondary students. JALT call Journal. 6(3). 189-218. Hoye, L. (2007). Adverbs and modality in English. Longman. London. Hyland K. (1996). Talking to the academy: forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication. 13(2). 251-281. Hyland, K. & J. Milton (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 6(1). 183-205. Raimes, A. (2002). Ten steps in planning a writing course and training teachers of writing. Methodology in language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. 2(3). 306-314. Renandya, W. A. and Jacobs, G. M. (2002). Extensive reading: Why aren’t we all doing it. Methodology in language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. 2(2). 295-302. Richardson, John E. (2007). Analyzing newspaper. an approach from critical discourse analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. New York. Ventola, E. (1997). Modalization: probability-an exploration into its role in academic writing. Trends In Linguistics Studies and Monographs. 1(4). 157-180.‏ Wong, I. (1983). Simplification features in the structure of colloquial Malaysian English. Singapore University. Singapore. 125-149. Zeena, As’ad, A. (2008). Epistemic modality markers in research articles: a cross- disciplinary study. Doctorate thesis at university of Baghdad. Iraq.
Statistics Article View: 242 PDF Download: 171