- All Journals
- Al-Qadisiyah University
- Basrah University
- Kirkuk University
- Mosul University
- The Iraqi Borad for Medical Specialization
- University of Anbar
- University of Technology
- Al Mustafa University
- Al-Zahraa University for Women
- Alnoor University
- Kunooz University
- Misan University
- Ninevah University
- Tikrit University
- University of Al-Hamdaniya
- University of Kerbala
Unhomeliness Vs. Hybridity: Women’s Suffering and Crisis of Identity in Elif Shafak’s Honor | ||
| Anbar University Journal of Languages and Literature | ||
| Article 23, Volume 14, Issue 2, 2022, Pages 630-649 PDF (407.95 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.37654/aujll.2022.176378 | ||
| Author | ||
| Qusay Khalaf Hussein* | ||
| Ministry of Education/ Anbar/ Qaem | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This paper examines Elif Shafak's novel Honor, which was released in 2011, using Homi K. Bhabha's concepts of unhomeliness and hybridity. The study observes the predicament of first and second-generation immigrants from patriarchal cultures to Western societies with laws that differ from the rules of traditional communities. Those immigrants try to hybridise and adapt to the values and customs of the new culture to which they are exposed. The critical study of the novel shows the conditions of two sisters, Pempe and Jamila, who constitute the novel's cornerstone in a destitute household of eight daughters, as well as the mother's frantic attempts to conceive a son. The two sisters live in a patriarchal culture that thinks a man has the right to rule over everything. Subsequently, Pempe marries Adam Topark, and they move to England, where they experience a state of unhomeliness and hybridity. Women suffer from unhomeliness and alienation, even in patriarchal societies, as a result of patriarchal constraints. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Patriarchy; Bhabha; unhomeliness; hybridity; Shafak; Honor | ||
| References | ||
|
Works Cited Amjad, F. A., & Albusalih, S. (2020). Hybridity and Unhomeliness in Fadia Faqir ’ S Willow Trees Don ’ T Weep : Analytical Study in Postcolonial Discourse. 17(6), 1221–1233. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge. London. D’ Cruze, S. (1992). Approaching the history of rape and sexual violence: Notes towards research. Women’s History Review, 1(3), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612029300200016 De Beauvoir, S. (2014). The second sex. In Classic and Contemporary Readings in Sociology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315840154-29 Guignery, V., Pesso-Miquel, C., & Specq, F. (2011). Hybridity: forms and figures in literature and the visual arts. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Pourgharib, B., Kiani, S., & Ziadbakhsh, S. (2018). The Honor of Being Colonized: A Bhabhaian Reading of Elif Shafak’s Honour. The International Journal of Humanities, 25(3), 49–62. Rubin, C. (2010). Between Traditional Practice and Secular Law: Examining Honor Killings in Modern Turkey. 14. http://middlab.middlebury.edu/files/2111/04/Honor-Killings-essay1.pdf Rushdie, S. (n.d.). Unit-20 Salman Rushdie: Imaginary Homelands: Essays and Criticism 1981-1991 (II). Principles of Criticism, 286. Shafak, E. (2007). Turks look forward with amnesia. New Perspectives, 24(2), 29–32. Shafak, E. (2012). Honor. Ara Llibres. Tracy, S. (2007). Patriarchy and Domestic Violence: Challenging Common Misconceptions. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 50(3), 573. Tyson, L. (2011). Using critical theory: How to read and write about literature. Routledge. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 167 PDF Download: 208 |
||