Mohammed Jawad, M. (2021). Spinal Malignancy Psychobehavioral Issues. , 21(4), 492-498. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.2021.177179
Mazin S. Mohammed Jawad. "Spinal Malignancy Psychobehavioral Issues". , 21, 4, 2021, 492-498. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.2021.177179
Mohammed Jawad, M. (2021). 'Spinal Malignancy Psychobehavioral Issues', , 21(4), pp. 492-498. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.2021.177179
Mohammed Jawad, M. Spinal Malignancy Psychobehavioral Issues. , 2021; 21(4): 492-498. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.2021.177179

Spinal Malignancy Psychobehavioral Issues

Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal
Article 18, Volume 21, Issue 4, 2022, Pages 492-498    PDF (201.76 K)
DOI: 10.52573/ipmj.2021.177179
Author
Mazin S. Mohammed Jawad*
AL-Imamein Al-Kadhemein Medical City, Baghdad/ Iraq
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Psychobehavioral is an all encompassing term for psychological and behavioral factors that are major determinants of the widely accepted biopsychobehavioral or multidimensional concept of diseases such as cancer.
AIM OF STUDY:
To identify psychobehavioral issues affecting patients with a diagnosis of a spinal column or cord tumor.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Using the keywords “cancer communication,” “psychobehavioral care,” and “spine cancer patient,” a review of literature was performed on Medline, and PsycInfo, a database of the psychology and psychiatry literature in the United States. The relevant articles were reviewed; in addition, relevant references from selected articles were searched. The Spine Oncology Study Group (SOSG),                   an international group of spine oncology specialists, identified key questions to be addressed in              the course of the systematic review of the literature. The key questions were answered using literature review and expert opinion.
Research questions:

Who are the allied health care professionals necessary for the comprehensive care of the spine tumor patient?
Does compassionate communication (in giving life altering information) affect outcome? What tools can be used in communication with the spine tumor patient?

RESULTS: 
Systematic review yielded 120 articles addressing communication in cancer patients. Those articles specifically addressed the 2 questions of interest in the spine tumor patient population.                            The literature search identified quality evidence; 2 randomized controlled studies were identified. Although neither specifically pertained to the spine tumor patient population, these articles were reviewed and graded as low-quality evidence.
CONCLUSION: 
A multidisciplinary group of allied health care professionals is a necessary prerequisite for                      the effective psychobehavioral care of the spine tumor patient. Compassionate communication, in the form of group sessions, telephone support groups, or internet based groups, can alleviate                 the psychobehavioral discomfort experienced by spine tumor patients.
 
Keywords
psychobehavioral care; cancer communication; spine cancer patient
References
  1. Lee, S.J.C., Jetelina, K.K., Marks, E. et al. Care coordination for complex cancer survivors in an integrated safety-net system: a study protocol. BMC Cancer. 2018;18, 1204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5118-7
  2. Jonathan Fuller, The new medical model: a renewed challenge for biomedicine. CMAJ.  May 2017, 189 : E640-E641; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.160627
  3. Wellman. Reflecting on Mortality to Inspire Vitality and Meaning in Life". Master of Applied Positive Psychology (MAPP) Capstone Projects. 2020;181. https://repository.upenn.edu/mapp_capstone/181
  4. Brazilian Consensus. SpecialArticle.Rev.Bras.Anestesiol.2016;66(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2016.09.007.
  5. Howell, D., Richardson, A., May, C. et al. Implementation of self-management support in cancer care and normalization into routine practice: a systematic scoping literature review protocol. Syst Rev. 2019; 8, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0952-5
  6. Barre PV, Padmaja G, Rana S, Tiamongla. Stress and quality of life in cancer patients: Medical and psychological intervention. Indian J Psychol Med 2018;40:232-8.
  7. Samantha R. Fashler, et al. The Use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Oncology Settings: A Narrative Review. Psychological Reports. SAGE JOURNALS. 2018;121;229-52.
  8. Smith TB, Workman C, Andrews C, Barton B, Cook M, Layton R, et al. Effects of psychosocial support interventions on survival in inpatient and outpatient healthcare settings: A meta-analysis of 106 randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2021;18: e1003595. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003595
  9. Amy Mulick, MSc, et al. Does depression treatment improve the survival of depressed patients with cancer? A long-term follow-up of participants in the SMaRT Oncology-2 and 3 trials. THE LANCET Psychiatry. 2018;5:321-26.
10. Chen X, Hua L, Zhang C, Xu Z, Cao X, Cai Y. Effect of peer support on improving self-management ability in peritoneal dialysis patients—a randomized controlled trial. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10(3):3028-3038. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-219

11. Somogy Varga, Mental disorder between naturalism and normativism Philosophy Compass. 2017; 12.

12. Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116671725. Published 2016 Oct 4. doi:10.1177/2050312116671725

13. Rahe RH, Veach TL, Tolles RL, et al. The stress and coping inventory: an educational and research instrument. Stress Med 2000;16:199–208.

14. Lynne McMordie. Avoidance strategies: stress, appraisal and coping in hostel accommodation. Housing Studies. 2021; 36:3, 380-396, DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2020.1769036

15. Mattsson S, Olsson EMG, Carlsson M, et. al. Identification of Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Patients With Cancer: Comparison Between Short and Long Web-Based Questionnaires. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e11387 doi: 10.2196/11387

16. Guo, Congying MB,Huang, Xuan MB. Hospital anxiety and depression scale exhibits good consistency but shorter assessment time than Zung self-rating anxiety/depression scale for evaluating anxiety/depression in non-small cell lung cancer, Medicine: 2021;100:e24428 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024428

17. Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University; (eBOOK) Published December 8, 2015.

18. Nock MK, Prinstein MJ. A functional approach to the assessment of self mutilative behavior. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72:885–90. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.885

19. Hansen, N. R. Kuncel, S. P. Reise, & M. C. Rodriguez. handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Testing and assessment in clinical and counseling psychology. American Psychological Association. 2013;2; 231–252.. https://doi.org/10.1037/14048-014

20. Gatchel RJ. Clinical Essentials of Pain Management. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005.

21. Wilson MG, Lavis JN, Ellen ME. Supporting chronic pain management across provincial and territorial health systems in Canada: Findings from two stakeholder dialogues. Pain Res Manag. 2015;20:269-79. doi:10.1155/2015/918976

22. James F. Cleary MD. Restoring balance to cancer pain management. Cancer . 2020;126:697-700.

  1. Smith TJ, Razzak AR, Blackford AL, et al. A Pilot Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of MC5-A Scrambler Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN). J Palliat Care 2020; 35:53.
24. Lilja A, DeMarinis V, Lehti A, et al. Experiences and explanations of mental ill health in a group of devout Christians from the ethnic majority population in secular Sweden: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e011647. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016- 011647.

25. Riegel, B., Tönnies, S., Hansen, E., et. al. German norms of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility (HGSHS-A) and proposal of a 5-Item short-version (HGSHS 5:G). International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 2021; 69:112-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2021.1836645

26. Boulding W, Glickman SW, Manary MP, Schulman KA, Staelin R. Relationship between patient satisfaction with inpatient care and hospital readmission within 30 days. Am J Manag Care. 2011; 17: 41e8

27. Karnatovskaia LV, Schultz JM, Niven AS, Steele AJ, Baker BA, Philbrick KL, Del Valle KT, Johnson KR, Gajic O, Varga K. System of Psychological Support Based on Positive Suggestions to the Critically Ill Using ICU Doulas. Crit Care Explor. 2021 26;3:e0403. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000403. PMID: 33912833; PMCID: PMC8078413.

28. Maindet, C., Burnod, A., Minello, C. et al. Strategies of complementary and integrative therapies in cancer-related pain—attaining exhaustive cancer pain management. Support Care Cancer. 2019; 27:3119–3132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04829-7.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statistics
Article View: 204
PDF Download: 95


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com