- All Journals
- Al-Qadisiyah University
- Basrah University
- Kirkuk University
- Mosul University
- The Iraqi Borad for Medical Specialization
- University of Anbar
- University of Technology
- Al Mustafa University
- Al-Zahraa University for Women
- Alnoor University
- Kunooz University
- Misan University
- Ninevah University
- Tikrit University
- University of Al-Hamdaniya
- University of Kerbala
Conceptual Metaphor of Death in Emily Dickinson’s I know that He exists | ||
| Anbar University Journal of Languages and Literature | ||
| Article 26, Volume 14, Issue 3, 2022, Pages 641-659 PDF (402.77 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.37654/aujll.2022.177710 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Jumaa Hussein Khalaf; Aiyad Ziyad Shtewi* | ||
| University of Anbar | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Conceptual metaphor is considered as involving structures that linguistically define metaphors. It is considered as being structures that linguistically define metaphors. It is a noticeable tool that represents a considerable difficulty in understanding the meaning exchanged, spoken or written, literary language especially the poetic one is no exception. To the researcher's best knowledge, conceptual metaphor has been tackled from different perspectives; yet a few studies have dealt with conceptual metaphor in the poetry of Emily Dickinson. To this end, this study aimed at analyzing the types of conceptual metaphors of death in Emily Dickinson's I know that He exists base exploring how the concept of death is best conceptualized in the selected poem. The analysis is based on Lakoff and Johnson's (2003) model of conceptual metaphor. The findings revealed that there were 4 structural metaphors and only one ontological metaphor. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| conceptual metaphor; metaphor; Emily Dickinson | ||
| References | ||
|
Allwood, J., and Gärdenfors, P., eds., 1998, Cognitive Semantics: Meaning and Cognition. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Baake, K. (2003). Metaphor and Knowledge: The Challenges of Writing Science. New York: State University of New York Press
Bright, William. (1992). International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University press.
Cacciari, C. & Glucksberg. (1994). Understanding Figurative Language. In M.A. Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.
Danaher, D (2003). Metaphor: Language, Thought, Art. Retrieved from muse.jhu.edu/journals/ poetics today/v024/24.3danaher.html.
Dancygier, Barbara, and Eve Sweetser. 2014. Figurative Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh university press.
Fauconnier, G &Turner, M. (1995). The Conceptual Integration and Formal Expression. Retrieved Feb,11 from:
Gentner, D (1982). Are Scientific Analogies Metaphors? Brighton: Harvester Press.
Gibbs, R (1994). The Poetics of Mind. Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Glucksberg, S & Keysar, B (1990). Understanding Metaphorical Comparisons. Psychological Reviews. 97 (1): 3-18.
Goatly, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphor. New York: Routledge.
Cuddon, J. A. (2013). A dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory 5ed. Wiley- Blackwell John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication.
Hauser, Gerald. (1986). Introduction to Rhetorical Theory. New York: Harper &Row Publisher Inc.
Holyoak, K (1982). An Analogical Framework for Literary Interpretation. Poetics 11. Retrieved from: www.jstor.org/journals/03335372.html.
Kovecses, Z., (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University press.
Kuswoyo, Heri & Siregar, R. A. (2019). Interpersonal Meta-Discourse Markers as Persuasive Strategies in Oral Business Presentation. Lingua Cultura,13(4), 297-304.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Turner (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Ortony, A (1992). Metaphor and Thought (2nd Ed). Cambridge: CUP.
Perrine, L. (1977). Sound and sense: an introduction to poetry. 5th ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Saeed, J. (2016). Semantics. Blackwell Publishers, Ltd.
Setri, Teta Irama & Setiawan, Dwi Budi. (2020). Matriarchal Society in The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(1), 28-33.
Steen, G (1994). Understanding Metaphor in Literature. New York: Longman. Unggul, Grace. M & Gulo, Ingatan. (2017). An Analysis of Gerund and to Infinitive in Argumentative Essays. Teknosastik: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 15(1), 1-6.
Yousif, Marwan Khaleel. (2018). Relationship Between Everyday Language and Literary Language and Their Lasting Effects on the Learners of English Language. Retrieved from:
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 195 PDF Download: 230 |
||