M. Allaw, A., L. Al Haddad, Z., Kh. Al Haddadi, R. (2023). The position of the United States of America on Türkiye's accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 1949-1952 AD. , 2023(2), 1131-1159. doi: 10.37653/juah.2023.178955
Ahmed M. Allaw; Zaynab L. Al Haddad; Riyadh Kh. Al Haddadi. "The position of the United States of America on Türkiye's accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 1949-1952 AD". , 2023, 2, 2023, 1131-1159. doi: 10.37653/juah.2023.178955
M. Allaw, A., L. Al Haddad, Z., Kh. Al Haddadi, R. (2023). 'The position of the United States of America on Türkiye's accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 1949-1952 AD', , 2023(2), pp. 1131-1159. doi: 10.37653/juah.2023.178955
M. Allaw, A., L. Al Haddad, Z., Kh. Al Haddadi, R. The position of the United States of America on Türkiye's accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 1949-1952 AD. , 2023; 2023(2): 1131-1159. doi: 10.37653/juah.2023.178955

The position of the United States of America on Türkiye's accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 1949-1952 AD

Journal of University of Anbar for Humanities
Article 6, Volume 2023, Issue 2, June 2023, Pages 1131-1159    PDF (974.56 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.37653/juah.2023.178955
Authors
Ahmed M. Allaw1; Zaynab L. Al Haddad2; Riyadh Kh. Al Haddadi3
1University of Samarra
2General Directorate of Education in Salaheldin
3University of Samarra – College of Education
Abstract
Washington has sought to establish regional defense arrangements, in implementation of its policy to achieve its imperial goals in the region, and has initiated the creation of alliances such as the "NATO project, which provides for NATO influence in the region. Turkey has become an active advocate of the idea of establishing regional defense arrangements", Middle Eastern " I promised that it would constitute the natural link between North Atlantic Treaty organization (NATO) and the "Middle East", but Turkey instead rushed more towards closer ties with the United States of America, until one observer described that close connection by saying, "The Turks assumed that they and the Americans are essentially homogeneous and that Turkey can It should even become America Minor.                         
     Whatever the case, the "Truman Doctrine" was the actual beginning of the growing American influence in the region through "Turkey" ... and the assistance provided under it came as a result of the United States' interest in Turkey's political, economic, and military security in order to preserve interest and "national security" "To Americans in the region; It is the policy that the United States of America pursued after the war, even if there was no enemy for it, represented by the Soviet Union.
Keywords
Position; United States of America; Türkiye; Agreement; NATO
References
  1. Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr, ed.. The Dynamics of World Power: a documentary,1997.
  2. Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., ed.. The Dynamics of World Power 1945-1973 New York, Chelsea House Publishers, 1973.
  3. Carter Malkasiam, The Korean War 1950-1953, University of Oxford, London, 2001.
  4. Celal Dora, Kore Savasi nda Türkler Istanbul: Ismail Akgün, 1963.
  5. Conference of Berlin, 1945, Vol.I.
  6. Conflict Resolution 24 (1980) .
  7. council (Spofford) to the Secretary of State SECRET LONDON, August 24, 1950, Vol. Ill.
  8. Cüneyt Arcayürek, Seytan Uçgeninde Türkiye, Ankara Bilgi, 1987, p. 376.
  9. David Fatua, The Long Pull Army, NSC 68, the Korean War, and the Creation
  10. Dean Acheson, Present at the creation my years in the State Department, New
  11. Feridun Cemal Erkin, Disislerinde 34 Yil, Washington Büyükelçilisi, Ankara, Turk Tarih Kurumu Basimevi, 1986.
  12. Feroz Ahmad, Demokrasi Surecinde Türkiye, 1945-1980 Istanbul HiL, 1994.
  13. Foreign Relations of the United States ,1945, Minutes of the third Meeting of the United States Delegation,Held at Washintgon,Friday,March 30,1945, Vol.I.
  14. FRUS, 1950, S.Actions To Conter Further Soviet Moves in the Immediate1950 Vol. Ill.
  15. FRUS, 1950, United States Delegation Minutes, Second Session, Preliminary Con versations for the September Foreign Ministers Meetings, Wash-ington, August 29, 1950 Vol. Ill.
  16. FRUS, 1950, Actions To Counter Further Soviet Moves in the Immediate
  17. FRUS, 1950, Memorand of conversation, by The Secretary of State, September 19,1950, Vol. Ill.
  18. FRUS, 1950, Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State for New Eastern South Asian and African Affairs (McGhee) to the Under Secre-tary of State وMay 1, 1950.Vol. 3..
  19. FRUS, 1950, Report by the National Security Concil, August 25, 1950, Volume I.
  20. FRUS, 1950, The Ambassador in Iran (Grady) to the Secretary of State August 23, 1950,Vol. Ill.
  21. FRUS, 1950, The Secretary of Defense (Johnson) to the Secretary of State, September 11,1950, Vol. Ill.
  22. FRUS, 1950, The United States Greece (Minor) to the Secretary of State,August 24, 1950, Vol. Ill.
  23. FRUS, 1950, US Actions To Conter Further Soviet Moves in the Immediate, Future Volume I .
  24. George S. Harris, Troubled Alliance: Turkish-American Problems in Historical
  25. history of United States foreign policy, 1945-1973. New York: Chelsea House
  26. Hüseyin Bascs, Türk Dis Politikassnda 1950 li Yillar, Ankara: METU, 2001.
  27. Ismail Soysal, Op. Cit., p, 101.
  28. Kemal Baglum, Anipolitik J945-1960 Ankara Bilgi, 1991..
  29. Mehmet Gonlubol, Olaylarla Türk Dis Politikas1919-1973 Ankara: Sevinç, 1974.
  30. Melvyn P. LeffIer, Strategy, Diplomacy, and the Cold War, The United States, Turkey and NATO, 1945 - 1952 The Journal of American History 71 (1985).
  31. NARA, Congressional Record, Senate, Vol.97, part II, 82 Congression, session,
  32. NARA, Congressional Record, Vol.96, part II, September 11, 1950.
  33. of the Cold War U.S. Army, The Journal of Military History 61 (1997).
  34. Perspective, 1945-1971. Washington D.C.: American Institute for Public Policy

Princeton University Press, 1995.

  1. Robert Jervis, The hnpact of the Korean War on the Cold War, The Journal of
  2. Sander Oral , Turk - Amerikan lliskileri 1947-1964, Ankara: Sevinç, 1979.
  3. Soysal, Ismail, Soguk Savas ve Türkiye, Olaylar Kronolojisi. Istanbul: ISIS.
  4. William Stueck, The Korean War: An International History, New Jersey.
  5. York: Norton, 1969.
Statistics
Article View: 585
PDF Download: 294


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com