تدرج السياسة القضائية

محمد مطلك القيسي, أ.د. حنان; حســـن حميــد الزيـادي, أ.م. وليـد

doi:10.63677/jqlap.2021.180196

	تدرج السياسة القضائية
AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences
Volume 12, Issue 2, August 2021, Pages 36-72 PDF (1.23 M)
DOI: 10.63677/jqlap.2021.180196
Authors
أ.د. حنان محمد مطلك القيسي; أ.م. وليـد حســـن حميــد الزيـادي
AL-Qadisiya Journal
Abstract
It has become a given that the judge's stray and his primary goal is to search for and uncover the truth, this truth that cannot be evident on its own, but rather passes through a series of successive and successive stages, based on painstaking effort, arduous research, intellectual follow-up, and mental selection, given the different capacities and abilities of judges. Their opinions differ and their views differ regarding the evidence before them, how it is assessed, and the mechanism for adopting it, so that ultimately results in a completed judicial policy.Accordingly, judicial policy cannot be achieved in one go or be the product of one stage. Rather, it takes its path in progression dependent on a group of pillars, which can be expressed through the foundations of judicial work. Therefore, it is not possible to talk about the stages of progression unless a group is shed light on. Of the pillars that should be based on the mentioned policy.
Keywords
Judicial impartiality; judicial interpretation; judicial reasoning; jurisprudence

Statistics Article View: 1,105 PDF Download: 92