Al-Baggoua, A., Hamid, A. (2023). A Solid Particle Erosion of Composite Materials: Review Paper. , 28(2), 145-151. doi: 10.33899/rengj.2023.139286.1247
Abdul-jabbar Al-Baggoua; Abdulhaqq A. Hamid. "A Solid Particle Erosion of Composite Materials: Review Paper". , 28, 2, 2023, 145-151. doi: 10.33899/rengj.2023.139286.1247
Al-Baggoua, A., Hamid, A. (2023). 'A Solid Particle Erosion of Composite Materials: Review Paper', , 28(2), pp. 145-151. doi: 10.33899/rengj.2023.139286.1247
Al-Baggoua, A., Hamid, A. A Solid Particle Erosion of Composite Materials: Review Paper. , 2023; 28(2): 145-151. doi: 10.33899/rengj.2023.139286.1247

A Solid Particle Erosion of Composite Materials: Review Paper

Al-Rafidain Engineering Journal (AREJ)
Article 13, Volume 28, Issue 2, September 2023, Pages 145-151    PDF (630.37 K)
Document Type: Review Paper
DOI: 10.33899/rengj.2023.139286.1247
Authors
Abdul-jabbar Al-Baggoua* ; Abdulhaqq A. Hamid
Mechanical Engineering Department, Collage of Engineering, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq
Abstract
The effect of erosion on the economy is widely acknowledged, with solid particle erosion (SPE) being recognized as one of the most significant forms of erosion resulting from the collision of solid particles with materials. While studying and comprehending erosion can be challenging, researchers have dedicated their efforts to this field and have devised models to anticipate the erosion rate of material elimination from the surface of an object, based on the material's response to solid particle impact. Most erosion models for composite materials take into account various physical and mechanical properties of the material, such as its density, porosity, modulus, strength, and fracture toughness. They also examine the characteristics of the particles that cause erosion, such as their size, shape, and hardness. Erosion models for composite materials are used to study the impact of different factors on erosion, such as the effect of particle size, velocity, and impingement angle. They are also used to optimize the design of composite materials and structures for specific applications and to evaluate the performance of protective coatings and erosion-resistant materials. Erosion models for composite materials can be either empirical or process-based. Empirical models use statistical relationships to predict erosion rates based on observed data, such as the size and shape of the particles, the velocity of the impacting particles, and the impingement angle. While the process-based models, on the other hand, use mathematical equations to simulate the physical processes that drive erosion, such as the deformation and fracture behaviour of the composite material under impact loading. Overall, erosion models for composite materials provide a valuable tool for understanding and predicting the complex processes that drive the erosion of composite materials, and for developing effective strategies to mitigate its impact on their performance and durability in various applications.
Keywords
Solid particle erosion; Erosion parameters; Particulate composite materials
References
  1. K. Mishra, S. Biswas, and A. Satapathy, ‘A study on processing, characterization and erosion wear behaviour of silicon carbide particle filled ZA-27 metal matrix composites’, Mater. Des., vol. 55, pp. 958–965, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.069.
  2. B. Chahar and A. Pun, "Erosion wear of ductile materials: A review." In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advancements and Recent Innovations in Mechanical, Production and Industrial Engineering (ARIMPIE—2016), ELK Asia Pacific Journal, Gaziabad, India, pp. 15-16. 2016.
  3. K. G. Budinski, Friction, Wear, and Erosion Atlas. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2013. doi: 10.1201/b15984.
  4. S. Das, D. P. Mondal, and S. Sawla, ‘Solid particle erosion of Al alloy and Al-alloy composites: Effect of heat treatment and angle of impingement’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1369–1379, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11661-004-0312-4.
  5. J. Alqallaf, N. Ali, J. A. Teixeira, and A. Addali, ‘Solid Particle Erosion Behaviour and Protective Coatings for Gas Turbine Compressor Blades—A Review’, Processes, vol. 8, no. 8, Art. no. 8, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.3390/pr8080984.
  6. N.-M. Barkoula and J. Karger-Kocsis, ‘Review Processes and influencing parameters of the solid particle erosion of polymers and their composites’, J. Mater. Sci., vol. 37, no. 18, pp. 3807–3820, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1023/A:1019633515481.
  7. M. Parsi, K. Najmi, F. Najafifard, S. Hassani, B. S. McLaury, and S. A. Shirazi, ‘A comprehensive review of solid particle erosion modeling for oil and gas wells and pipelines applications’, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 21, pp. 850–873, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.10.001.
  8. E. Bousser, L. Martinu, and J. E. Klemberg-Sapieha, ‘Solid particle erosion mechanisms of protective coatings for aerospace applications’, Surf. Coat. Technol., vol. 257, pp. 165–181, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.08.037.
  9. M. G. Gee and I. M. Hutchings, ‘General approach and procedures for erosive wear testing.’, 2002.
  10. B. Chahar ‘Mathematical Model to Predict the Solid Particle Erosion Wear Rate of Materials: A Review’, Asia Pacific Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research, vol. 3 Issue 1 2017.
  11. M. Liebhard and A. Levy, ‘The effect of erodent particle characteristics on the erosion of metals’, Wear, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 381–390, Dec. 1991, doi: 10.1016/0043-1648(91)90263-T.
  12. A. P. Harsha and A. A. Thakre, ‘Investigation on solid particle erosion behaviour of polyetherimide and its composites’, Wear, vol. 262, no. 7, pp. 807–818, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.08.012.
  13. E. Avcu, S. Fidan, Y. Yıldıran, and T. Sınmazçelik, ‘Solid particle erosion behaviour of Ti6Al4V alloy’, Tribol. - Mater. Surf. Interfaces, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 201–210, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1179/1751584X13Y.0000000043.
  14. M. Parsi, K. Najmi, F. Najafifard, S. Hassani, B. S. McLaury, and S. A. Shirazi, ‘A comprehensive review of solid particle erosion modeling for oil and gas wells and pipelines applications’, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 21, pp. 850–873, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.10.001.
  15. G. R. Desale, B. K. Gandhi, and S. C. Jain, ‘Particle size effects on the slurry erosion of aluminium alloy (AA 6063)’, Wear, vol. 266, no. 11, pp. 1066–1071, May 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.01.002.
  16. A. Marrah, ‘Simulating of erosion modeling using ANSYS fluid dynamics’, masters, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 2019. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2022. [Online]. Available:https://research.library.mun.ca/13763/
  17. R. P. Panakarajupally, F. Mirza, J. El Rassi, G. N. Morscher, F. Abdi, and S. Choi, ‘Solid particle erosion behavior of melt-infiltrated SiC/SiC ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) in a simulated turbine engine environment’, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 216, p. 108860, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108860.
  18. R. S. Lynn, K. K. Wong, and H. M. Clark, ‘On the particle size effect in slurry erosion’, Wear, vol. 149, no. 1–2, pp. 55–71, 1991.
  19. J. Salik, D. Buckley, and W. A. Brainard, ‘The effect of mechanical surface and heat treatments on the erosion resistance of 6061 aluminum alloy’, Wear, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 351–358, 1981.
  20. Smeltzer, C., Gulden, M., Compton, W., 1970. Mechanisms of metal removal by impacting dust particles. J. Basic Eng. Trans. ASME 639e654
Statistics
Article View: 385
PDF Download: 249


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com