Adewumi, R., Sulaiman, W., Shola, A. (2023). Life cycle economic comparison between rigid and flexible pavement: a case study for the construction of wajen- garin barkamawa-dugurawa road in kano state nigeria. , 42(5), 505-515. doi: 10.30684/etj.2023.144541.1637
Rowland Adewumi; Wasiu Kayode Sulaiman; Adeniyi Shola. "Life cycle economic comparison between rigid and flexible pavement: a case study for the construction of wajen- garin barkamawa-dugurawa road in kano state nigeria". , 42, 5, 2023, 505-515. doi: 10.30684/etj.2023.144541.1637
Adewumi, R., Sulaiman, W., Shola, A. (2023). 'Life cycle economic comparison between rigid and flexible pavement: a case study for the construction of wajen- garin barkamawa-dugurawa road in kano state nigeria', , 42(5), pp. 505-515. doi: 10.30684/etj.2023.144541.1637
Adewumi, R., Sulaiman, W., Shola, A. Life cycle economic comparison between rigid and flexible pavement: a case study for the construction of wajen- garin barkamawa-dugurawa road in kano state nigeria. , 2023; 42(5): 505-515. doi: 10.30684/etj.2023.144541.1637

Life cycle economic comparison between rigid and flexible pavement: a case study for the construction of wajen- garin barkamawa-dugurawa road in kano state nigeria

Engineering and Technology Journal
Volume 42, Issue 5, May 2024, Pages 505-515    PDF (1.11 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30684/etj.2023.144541.1637
Authors
Rowland Adewumi* 1; Wasiu Kayode Sulaiman2; Adeniyi Shola3
1Civil Engineering Dept., University of Abuja, Nigeria.
2Zephyrgold Limited, Abuja, Nigeria
3Amadeus Construction Limited, Abuja, Nigeria.
Abstract
Flexible pavements may be strengthened and enhanced incrementally to meet traffic needs, making them preferable to cement concrete roadways. Due to the rise of poor-quality bituminous pavements, Nigeria is promoting concrete pavements. Concrete pavements are becoming more popular because of their durability and ability to withstand heavy traffic and harsh environmental conditions. The primary objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of both flexible and rigid pavement suitability, considering various parameters such as material characteristics, load-bearing capacity, longevity, and cost-effectiveness. The pavement structure used for the project meets the Federal Ministry of Works Highway Manual Part 1, Design Volume III specifications, with a few compositional adjustments. The study contains cost estimates for numerous parts of flexible pavement design, such as using a concrete wearing course, a bitumen emulsion tack coat, a concrete binder course, and an MC 1 cutback bitumen prime coat. The expenditure associated with the construction of flexible pavement amounts to 1,760,293,155.18 N, while the anticipated cost for the construction of rigid pavement is projected at 2,725,765,337.00 N. In percentage terms, rigid pavement costs 64% more than flexible pavement. Flexible pavement costs are based on supply, construction, and finish unit rates. The projected flexible pavement cost includes labor, materials, and plant expenditures. Reinforcing and concrete costs are estimated in rigid pavement studies. The analysis examines plant, people, and permanent material expenses. The research gives detailed pavement structural design and construction cost estimates for the road project, enabling informed pavement structure decisions.

Highlights
  • Rigid pavement construction costs 64% more than flexible pavement construction.
  • Rigid pavement exceeded flexibility in strength, deformation, and wheel loads.
  • Rigid pavement increases sustainability via a longer lifespan and lower maintenance.
  • Rigid pavement becomes financially efficient over time, highlighting longevity in choice.
Keywords
Flexible Pavement; Rigid Pavement; Life cost analysis; Load-bearing capacity; Durability
References
  1. Uzondu; S. Jamson: G. Marsden, Road safety in Nigeria: unravelling the challenges, measures, and strategies for improvement. Int. J. Inj. Control Saf. Promot., 29 (2022) 522–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2022.2087230
  2. Effiom; P. Ubi, Deficit, Decay and Deprioritization of Transport Infrastructure in Nigeria: Policy Options for Sustainability. Int. J. Finance Econ., 8 (2016) 55. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v8n3p55
  3. B. Adedotun; D. S. Ogundahunsi; A. S. Oyeniyi, Assessment of road transport infrastructure in Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria, WIT Trans. Built Environ., 164 (2016) 61-72.
  4. O. Salisu; O. O. Oyesiku; B. O. Odufuwa, Highway Development and Capacity Utilisation in Ogun State, Nigeria. LOGI – Scie. J. Tran. Logi., 11 (2020) 66–77. https://doi.org/10.2478/logi-2020-0007
  5. O. Okafor, A Critical Assessment of Road Infrastructural Development in Akwa-Ibom State, Nigeria. African Res. Review, 14 (2020) 179–193. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v14i1.16
  6. Mudi; J. Lowe; D. Manase, Public-Private Financed Road Infrastructure Development in North-Central Region of Nigeria. J. Manag. Sust., 5 (2015) 58. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v5n4p58
  7. Ogunleye; A. Ajibola; O. Enilolobo; O. Shogunle, Influence of road transport infrastructure on agricultural sector development in Nigeria, Logistics & Sustainable Trans., 9 (2018) 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2478/jlst-2018-0004
  8. A. Sanni; J. O. Adebiyi, Innovative operating strategies in build–operate–transfer transport infrastructure in Nigeria. Infras. Asset Manag., 6 (2019) 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.18.00009
  9. I. Ugwueze; C. C. Ezeibe; J. I. Onuoha, The political economy of automobile development in Nigeria. Review of African Political Economy, 47 (2020) 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2020.1721277
  10. Nascimento; B. Gouveia; F. Dias; F. Ribeiro; M. A. Silva, A method to select a road pavement structure with life cycle assessment. J. Cleaner Prod., 271 (2020) 122210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122210
  11. F. Hamim; S. S. Aninda; M. S. Hoque; M. Hadiuzzaman, Suitability of pavement type for developing countries from an economic perspective using life cycle cost analysis, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol., 14 (2021) 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-020-0107-z
  12. Qiao; A. R. Dawson; T. Parry; G. Flintsch; W. Wang, Flexible Pavements and Climate Change: A Comprehensive Review and Implications. Sustainability, 12 (2020) 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031057
  13. Taher; S. Alyousify; H. Hassan, Comparative Study of Using Flexible and Rigid Pavements for Roads: A Review Study. J. Univ. Duhok, 23 (2020) 222–234. https://doi.org/10.26682/csjuod.2020.23.2.18
  14. Kulkarni; M. Ranadive, Comparative Study Between Proposed Rigid Pavement and Flexible Perpetual Pavement for Western Alignment of Pune Ring Road, Recent Adv. Civ. Eng., 172 (2021) 741–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4396-5_65
  15. V. Mohod; K. N. Kadam, A comparative study on rigid and flexible pavement: A review. J. Mech. Civ. Eng. (IOSR)13 (2016) 84-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/1684-1303078488
  16. Obeta; J. Njoku, Durability Of Flexible Pavements: A Case Study of South-Eastern Nigeria. Nigerian J. Technol., 35 (2016) 297. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v35i2.9
  17. Cao; W.G. Wong; Y. Zhong; L. W. Cheung, Dynamic Response of Rigid Pavements Due to Moving Vehicle Load with Acceleration. Pavements Mater., (2012) .https://doi.org/10.1061/41008(334)7
  18. M. Zhang; X. D. Wang, Deformation Analysis of Pavement Structures under Coexistence of Vertical and Horizontal Loads. Appl. Mech. Mate., 44–47 (2010) 3053–3059. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.44-47.3053
  19. Gao; Z. Lu, Dynamic responses of flexible multi-layered pavement subjected to vehicle loads. Int. Conf. Mech. Autom. Con. Eng., (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MACE.2010.5535959
  20. Jain; Y. P. Joshi; S. S. Goliya, Design of Rigid and Flexible Pavements by Various Methods & Their Cost Analysis of Each Method, Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., 3 (2013) 119-123.
  21. M. Disfani; A. Mohammadinia; G. A. Narsilio; L. Aye, Performance evaluation of semi-flexible permeable pavements under cyclic loads. Int. J. Pavement Eng., 21(2018) 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1475666
  22. Remišová; M. Decký; M, Mikolaš; M. Hájek; L. Kovalčík; M, Mečár, Design of Road Pavement Using Recycled Aggregate. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 44 (2016) 022016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/44/2/022016
  23. Jihanny, The Overload Impact on Design Life of Flexible Pavement. Int. J. Geomate, 20 (2021) 65-72. https://doi.org/10.21660/2021.78.j2020
  24. E. Ekeocha; N. Egesi, Evaluation of Subgrade Soils using California Bearing Ratio (CBR) in Parts of Rivers. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag., 18 (2014) 185. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v18i2.5
  25. Muthu; S. Geetha; M. Selvakumar, Predicting soaked CBR of SC subgrade from dry density for light and heavy compaction. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45 (2021) 1664–1670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.558
  26. O. Akintayo; T. D. Osasona, Design of Rigid Pavement for Oke- Omi Road, Ibadan, Nigeria. FUOYE J. Eng. Technol., 7 (2022). https://doi.org/10.46792/fuoyejet.v7i3.837
  27. Federal Ministry of Works & Housing, (2023).
  28. T. Almusawi; A. M. Burhan, Developing a Model to Estimate the Productivity of Ready Mixed Concrete Batch Plant. J. Eng., 26 (2020) 80–93. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2020.10.06
  29. S. Heralova, Life Cycle Costing as an Important Contribution to Feasibility Study in Construction Projects. Procedia Eng., 196 (2017) 565–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.031
  30. Maisham; H. Adnan; N. A. Adillah Ismail; N. A. Asyikin Mahat, Developing a Research Methodology for Life Cycle Costing Framework for Application in Green Projects. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ. Sci., 385 (2019) 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012066
Statistics
Article View: 587
PDF Download: 823


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com