Adetona, S., Adetola, M., Okafor, F., Ubakanwa, N. (2024). Impact of the UPFC on the optimal transmission switching for cutting down market power cost. , 42(2), 312-326. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.144807.1645
Sunday Oladejo Adetona; Makanjuola Yussuf Adetola; Frank Nwoye Okafor; Nwabueze Godfrey Ubakanwa. "Impact of the UPFC on the optimal transmission switching for cutting down market power cost". , 42, 2, 2024, 312-326. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.144807.1645
Adetona, S., Adetola, M., Okafor, F., Ubakanwa, N. (2024). 'Impact of the UPFC on the optimal transmission switching for cutting down market power cost', , 42(2), pp. 312-326. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.144807.1645
Adetona, S., Adetola, M., Okafor, F., Ubakanwa, N. Impact of the UPFC on the optimal transmission switching for cutting down market power cost. , 2024; 42(2): 312-326. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.144807.1645

Impact of the UPFC on the optimal transmission switching for cutting down market power cost

Engineering and Technology Journal
Volume 42, Issue 2, February 2024, Pages 312-326    PDF (719.14 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30684/etj.2024.144807.1645
Authors
Sunday Oladejo Adetona* ; Makanjuola Yussuf Adetola; Frank Nwoye Okafor; Nwabueze Godfrey Ubakanwa
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.
Abstract
The exercise of market power by the strategic generating companies (gencos) in the deregulated wholesale electricity market (WEM) should be mitigated, as it results in higher wholesale prices of electricity and a drop in competition in the WEM. Consequently, Optimal Transmission Switching (OTS) has been proposed as a means by which the System Operator in the WEM can use to mitigate it. It is also imperative that the effect of the Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) on reducing the cost due to the market power using OTS must be investigated. Therefore, this study used the Fast Voltage Stability Index (FVSI) to select the critical lines to be optimally switched and compensated. The compensation factor was used to size the UPFC. The modified IEEE 14-bus system was utilized as the test system. Worst Nash Equilibrium (WNE) was used to model the behavior of the strategic gencos in exercising market power on an EPG. The OTS under WNE was modeled and solved in the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) studio with the aid of the Network Enabled Optimization System (NEOS) server. The results of the FVSI were used to modify the parameters of the EPG in the GAMS studio and identify critical lines for the OTS. The simulated results revealed that in using OTS under WNE, strategic gencos dispatch more power in the presence of the UPFC than in its absence, reducing the cost associated with the market power of the strategic gencos.

Highlights
  • WNE models strategic generation companies' (gencos) behavior in exercising market power on EPG
  • The fast voltage stability index adjusts EPG parameters and identifies critical lines for OTS
  • A forceful reduction in social cost occurs when the market is under WNE and OTS is implemented
  • Social cost for scheduling gencos under WNE and OTS, with or without the UPFC, remains the same
  • A strategic generator dispatches more power in the presence of UPFC compared to its absence in the EPG
Keywords
Market power; Strategic gencos; Optimal transmission switching; Fast voltage stability index; and UPFC
References
  1. Wolak, Managing Unilateral Marlket Power in Electricity, World Bank Policy Research, September 2005. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3691
  2. F. Rahimi and A. Y. Sheffrin, Effective market monitoring in deregulated electricity market, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 18 (2003) 486-496. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2003.810680
  3. Granelli, M. Montagna, F. Zanellini, P. Bresesti, R. Vailati and M. Innorta, Optimal network reconfiguration for congestion management by deterministic and genetic algorithms, Electr. Power Res., 76 (2006) 549-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2005.09.014
  4. Schnyder and H. Glatvitsch, Security enhancement using an optimal switching power flow, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 5 (1990) 674-681. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.54580
  5. Fisher, R. P. O'Neill and M. C. Ferris, Optimal Transmission Switching, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 23 (2008) 1346-1355. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2008.926411
  6. Wei and V. Vijay, Corrective switching algoritm for relieving overloads and voltage violations, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 20 (2005) 1877-1885. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857931
  7. A. Noriega Odor, Optimal Transmission Switching for Reducing Market Power Cost, Stockholm, MSc Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2012.
  8. Yaser, M. Hesamzadeh, R. Baldick and D. Biggar, Transmission network switching for reducing market cost in generation sector: A Nash-equilibrum approach, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 146 (2017) 71- 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2016.12.031
  9. Acharya, A. S. Yome and N. Mithulananthan, Facts about flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) controllers: Practical installations and benefits, Australian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC), Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, September 25-28, 2005. Tasmania, Australia: School of Engineering, University of Tasmania.
  10. Gupta , B. Khan and S. E. Mubeen, Available transfer capablity enhancement by Unified Power Flow Controller., IEEE International Conf. Signal Process. Inf. Commun. Energy Syst., (SPICES), Kozhikode, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPICES.2015.7091428
  11. Xiao, Y. H. Song and Y. Z. Sun, Application of stochastic srogramming for available transfer capablity enhancements using FACTS devices, IEEE Power Engineering Soceity Summer Meeting, Seattle, WA, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1109/PESS.2000.867638
  12. S. Sunday, O. P. Ubeh and B. Jimoh, Efficient utilization of transmission line via optimal location of UPFC considering loadability analysis., Zaria J. Electr. Eng. Technol., Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, 10, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28808.90885
  13. B. Vijay and V. Ramaiah, Enhancement of dynamic stability by optimal location and capacity of UPFC: A hybrid approach, Energy, 2019.
  14. G. Adebayo, M. A. Bhaskhar, A. A. Yusuff and A. A. Jimoh, Optimal location identification of FACTS devices through Genetic Algorithm and Network Structural Characteristics Techniques, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications, 778-782, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICRERA.2016.7884442
  15. O. Adetona, E. B. Olaboyin, R. I. Salawu and F. N. Okafor, Upshot of unified power flow controller on the minimization of the severity of overloading on electric power grid, J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci., 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2021.10.010
  16. Karthikeyan, S. K. Sahoo, R. Roopesh, S. Mathur, I. J. Raglend and D. P. Kothari, Utilizing FACTS devices in enhancements of market power under congestion- A threat to a deregulated market., in Annual IEEE Indian Conference (INDICON), 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDCON.2012.6420632
  17. Gupta and K. Sarbjeet, Importance of FACTS devices in Power Systems, Int. J. Sci. Res., 10 (2021) 529-533.
  18. A. Taher and H. Besharat, Transmission Congestion Management by Determining Optimal Location of FACTS in Deregulated Power Systems, Am. J. Appl. Sci., 5 (2008) 242-247. https://doi.org/10.3844/AJASSP.2008.242.247
  19. Samimi and M. A. Golkar, A Novel method for optimal placement of FACTS based on sensitivity analysis for enhancement of power system static security, Asian J. Appl. Sci., 5 (2012) 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajaps.2012.1.19
  20. Roshan, P. Samal and P. Sinha, Optimal placement of FACTS devices in power transmission network using power stablity index and fast voltage stability index, IEEE 2020 Int. Conf. Electr. Electron. Eng., 246 - 251, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE348803.2020.9122975
  21. Adetona, R. Salawu, F. Okafor and J. Adeyemi, The impact of Unified Power Flow Controller on the loadability of the Electric Power Grid., J. Eng. Studies and Res., 26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.29081/jesr.v26i4.231
  22. Ahmad, S. Mekhilef and F. Albatsh, Voltage Stability Improvement by Placing Unified Power Flow Controller at suitable location in Power System Network, 2014.
  23. Hingorani N. G. and Gyugyi L., Understanding FACTS, New York: IEEE Press, 2000.
  24. Saravanan, S. Mary Raja Slochanal, P. Venkatesh and J. Prince Stephen Abraham, Application of particle swarm optimization technique for optimal location of FACTS devices considering cost of installation and system loadability, Electr. Power Sys. Res., 77 (2007) 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2006.03.006
  25. A. Khan, U. Khalil, H. Khan, A. Uddin and S. Ahmed, Power Flow Control by Unified Power Flow Controller, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., 9 (2019) 3900-3904. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2587
  26. Grainger, J. J. and Stevenson, W. D., Jr. Power System Analysis, McGraw-Hill, Inc., Singapore, 1994.
  27. Musirin and T. K. Abdul Rahman, Novel fast voltage stability index (FVSI) for voltage stability analysis in power system, Student Conference on Research and Development, SCORED, 265-268, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCORED.2002.1033108
  28. Saadat, H., Power System Analysis, New York: Mc Graw Hill, 1999.
  29. W. Hedman, S. S. Oren and R. P. O’Neill, Flexible Transmission in the Smart Grid: Optimal Transmission Switching, in A. Sorokin et al. (eds.), Handbook of Networks in Power Systems I, Energy Systems, 523 – 554, 2012.
  30. W. Hedman, R. P. O’Neill, E. B. Fisher and S. S. Oren, Optimal Transmission Switching With Contingency Analysis, IEEE Trans. Power Sys., 24 (2009) 1577 – 1586. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2020530
  31. Yang, H. Zhong, Q. Xia and C. Kang, Optimal Transmission Switching With Short-Circuit Current Limitation Constraints, IEEE Trans. Power Sys., 31 (2016) 1278 – 1288. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2434961
Statistics
Article View: 404
PDF Download: 293


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com