- All Journals
- Al-Qadisiyah University
- Basrah University
- Kirkuk University
- Mosul University
- The Iraqi Borad for Medical Specialization
- University of Anbar
- University of Technology
- Al Mustafa University
- Al-Zahraa University for Women
- Alnoor University
- Kunooz University
- Misan University
- Ninevah University
- Tikrit University
- University of Al-Hamdaniya
- University of Kerbala
Article reviewing the tagged (The supplier’s obligation to inform the consumer in consumer contracts - a comparative study - between the European directive of 2011 and the Iraqi consumer protection law | ||
| Journal of Anbar University for Law and Political Sciences | ||
| Article 54, Volume 14, Issue: 1 part 1, March 2024, Pages 1564-1571 PDF (653.22 K) | ||
| Document Type: Review Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.37651/aujlps.2024.147521.1208 | ||
| Author | ||
| Zman Ghazi Jaafar* | ||
| College of law /Al-Nahrain Universit | ||
| Abstract | ||
| One of the most important legal issues that has occupied the minds of researchers in the field of law is the issue of protecting the weak party in consumption contracts, which is the consumer, and trying to strike a kind of balance between him and the supplied merchant, who represents the stronger party, as he is an expert and professional in his field of work, which can create a gap between him and the consumer. This balancing act is achieved by obliging the stronger party in the contract (the merchant) to inform the consumer of everything that would enhance consumer satisfaction in terms of the terms and conditions of the contract and product specifications. It is a preventive means to protect consumer satisfaction, which finds its origin within the scope of the civil law, which obliges that the seller must inform the buyer of the item sold and its specifications, especially in the French Civil Code, which derived its provisions from Roman law under what is called (the principle of the right to know about the item sold), as the Roman law sought to eliminate the seller’s fraud and deception regarding hidden defects in the item sold, so it was obligatory for the seller to inform the buyer as it was considered minor. Experience was the best preventive means of protecting the consumer, so consumer legislation stipulated this obligation. The research under review, | ||
| Keywords | ||
| media; consumer; consumer contracts; consumer protection law | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 748 PDF Download: 134 |
||