Naji, K., Al-Neami, M., Mahmood, M. (2024). Dynamic displacement of sheet pile walls adjacent to the railway track. , 42(5), 593-603. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.147388.1709
Kather A. Naji; Mohammed A. Al-Neami; Mahmood R. Mahmood. "Dynamic displacement of sheet pile walls adjacent to the railway track". , 42, 5, 2024, 593-603. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.147388.1709
Naji, K., Al-Neami, M., Mahmood, M. (2024). 'Dynamic displacement of sheet pile walls adjacent to the railway track', , 42(5), pp. 593-603. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.147388.1709
Naji, K., Al-Neami, M., Mahmood, M. Dynamic displacement of sheet pile walls adjacent to the railway track. , 2024; 42(5): 593-603. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.147388.1709

Dynamic displacement of sheet pile walls adjacent to the railway track

Engineering and Technology Journal
Volume 42, Issue 5, May 2024, Pages 593-603    PDF (1.99 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30684/etj.2024.147388.1709
Authors
Kather A. Naji* ; Mohammed A. Al-Neami; Mahmood R. Mahmood
Civil Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.
Abstract
Due to the scarcity of experimental laboratory research on the effect of repetitive stress resulting from the railway on retaining walls, this study presents an investigation of an experimental laboratory model to study the effect of repetitive loads resulting from the railway on the adjacent retaining wall through several factors. The results of an experimental investigation of horizontal displacements of steel sheet pile walls behind excavations in the sand adjacent to railway tracks are presented. A series of model tests have been carried out in which the effect of sand density, horizontal distance between the railway and the sheet wall, and dynamic load amplitude on the wall horizontal dynamic displacement and its relationship to the railway dynamic vertical settlement were investigated with a load frequency equal to 2 Hz. The study examines various parameters, including different relative densities (30% loose, 55% medium, and 75% dense sand), different distances between the railway and retaining wall (0.5 H, 1 H, and 1.5 H), and variations in burden amplitudes (0.22, 0.44, and 0.66 tons). The most important factor that affects the dynamic displacement ratio (D/H) value is the relative density of the soil. The dynamic displacement ratio inversely correlates with the horizontal distance separating the railway and the retaining wall. The displacement ratio experienced a reduction of approximately 30% and 23% when the railway location relative to the retaining wall shifted from 0.5H to 1H and from 1 H to 1.5 H, respectively. The displacement ratio is directly proportional to the amplitude of cyclic live loading. Ultimately, using dense backfill soil enhances efficiency, resulting in decreased settlement of the railway and improved performance of the nearby retaining walls. It should be noted that there is a direct correlation between the horizontal movement of the wall and the vertical settlement of the rail. In the case of dense soil, these values are closely aligned.

Highlights
  • Examined density, distance, and load's effects on wall response and rail settlement
  • Subgrade density increase leads to lower displacement ratios: 53% then 31%
  • Displacement ratio drops with greater wall-rail distanc
  • Higher live load amplitudes increase displacement ratios in the sand
  • Denser soil and smaller loads reduce wall displacement and track settlement
Keywords
Dynamic response; Sheet walls; Railway; Sandy backfill; Displacement
References
  1. A. Montenegro, H. Carvalho, D. Ribeiro, R. Calçada, M. Tokunaga, M. Tanabe, W. M. Zhai, Assessment of train running safety on bridges: A literature review, Eng. Struct., 241 (2021) 112425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112425
  2. Ou, X. Zhang, J. Fu, C. Zhang, X. Zhou, H. Feng, Cause investigation of large deformation of a deep excavation support system subjected to unsymmetrical surface loading, Eng. Fail. Anal., 107 (2020) 104202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104202
  3. S. Vadavadagi, S. Chawla, Effect of rail axle load on geosynthetic reinforced back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls: Experimental and numerical studies, Transp. Geotech., 38 (2023) 100907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100907
  4. Mandloi, A. Hegde, Performance evaluation of reinforced earth walls with sustainable backfills subjected to railway loading, Front. built environ., 8 (2022) 1048079. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.1048079
  5. W. Jacobs, R. B. Malla, On live load impact factors for railroad bridges, Int. J. Rail Transp., 7 (2019) 262-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2019.1604182
  6. Mishra, P. Samui, E. Mahmoudi, Probabilistic design of retaining wall using machine learning methods, Appl. Sci., 11 (2021) 5411. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125411
  7. K. Gade, S. M. Dasaka, Short-and long-term behavior of EPS geofoam in reduction of lateral earth pressure on rigid retaining wall subjected to surcharge loading, Geotext. Geomembr., 50 (2022) 868-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.05.002
  8. Ramadan, M. Meguid, Behavior of cantilever secant pile wall supporting excavation in sandy soil considering pile-pile interaction, Arab. J. Geosci., 13 (2020).
  9. Feng, Q. Luo, P. Lyu, D. P. Connolly, T. Wang, An Analysis of Dynamics of Retaining Wall Supported Embankments: Towards More Sustainable Railway Designs, Sustainability, 15 (2023) 7984. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107984
  10. Moormann, Analysis of wall and ground movements due to deep excavations in soft soil based on a new worldwide database, Soils Found., 44 (2004) 87–98. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.44.87
  11. Dijckmans, A. Ekblad, A. Smekal, G. Degrande, G. Lombaert, Efficacy of a sheet pile wall as a wave barrier for railway induced ground vibration, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 84 (2016) 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.02.001
  12. B. Peck, Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground, 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico, 1969, 225-290.
  13. Fujita, Soft ground tunnelling and buried structures, 13th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, New Delhi, 5, 1994, 89-108.
  14. W. Clough, T. D. O'Rourke, Construction induced movements of in situ walls, Specially Conference on Design and Performance of Earth Retaining Structures, New York, 1990, 439-470.
  15. W. Cloughand, G. M. Denby, Stabilising term design for temporary walls in clay, J. Geotech. Eng. Division, 103 (1977) 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000386
  16. N. M. Gilani, M. Habibzadeh, S. M. Hosseinian, R. Salehfard, A Review of Railway Track Laboratory Tests with Various Scales for Better Decision-Making about More Efficient Apparatus Using TOPSIS Analysis, Adv. Civ. Eng., (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9374808
  17. Y. Fattah, M. R. Mahmood, M. F. Aswad, Stress Distribution from Railway Track over Geogrid Reinforced Ballast underlain by Clay, Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 18 (2019) 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0491-z
  18. Das, B. Principles of Foundation Engineering; D. B. M. Contractors, Inc., Federal Way, Washington, USA, 2011.
  19. American Society of Testing and Materials, Standard test method for specific gravity, ASTM D 854, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA, 2010.
  20. American Society of Testing and Materials, Standard test method for particle size-analysis of soils, ASTM D422-63, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA, 2010.
  21. American Society of Testing and Materials, Standard test method for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table, ASTM D4253, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA, 2006.
  22. American Society of Testing and Materials, Standard Test Method for Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density, ASTM D4254. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA, 2006.
  23. American Society of Testing and Materials, Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (united soil classification system), ASTM D2487, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA, 2006.
  24. O. A. Awoleye, Ballast type - ballast life predictions, Derby, British rail research LR CES 122, 1993.
  25. H. Thom, S. F. Brown, Effect of moisture on the structural performance of a crushed-limestone road base, Transp. Res. Rec., (1987) 50-56.
  26. Georgiadis, C. Anagnostopoulos, Displacement of Structures Adjacent to Cantilever Sheet Pile Walls, Soils Found., 39 (1999) 99-104. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.39.2_99
  27. A. Al-Neami, F. H. Rahil, A. F. Hussain, Settlement of Shallow Foundation in Dry Sand under the Earthquake, Eng. Technol. J., 39 (2021) 1206-1215. http://doi.org/10.30684/etj.v39i8.527
  28. Zhao, X. Wu, X. Ma., Model Test Study of the Synergistic Interaction between New and Existing Components of Sheet Pile Walls, Appl. Sci., 13 (2023) 1557. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031557
  29. E. Hamdi, M. Y. Fattah, and M. Y. Aswad, Studying the Settlement of Backfill Sandy Soil Behind Retaining Wall Under Dynamic Loads, Eng. Technol. J., 38 (2020) 992-1000. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.v38i7A.528
  30. A. Al-Neami, H. H. Baqir, S. H. Hameed, Behavior of Single Micropile Under Different Lateral Load Rates, Eng. Technol. J., 39 (2021) 167-179. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.v39i2A.654
  31. L. Paute, P. Hornych, J. P. Benaben, Repeated load triaxial testing of granular materials in the French network of laboratories des ponts et chausse´es, Flexible Pavements, proceedings of the European Symposium Euroflex, Gomes Correia, editor, Balkema, 1996, 53–64.
  32. Asakereh1, S. N. Moghaddas Tafreshi, M. Ghazavi, Strip footing behavior on reinforced sand with void subjected to repeated loading, Int. J. Civ. Eng., 10 (2012) 140-152.
Statistics
Article View: 421
PDF Download: 352


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com