The study of heat transfers and thermal performance of different types of solar box cookers

Alaskaree, Ekram H; Alammar, Ahmed A.

doi:10.30772/qjes.2024.148577.1187

	The study of heat transfers and thermal performance of different types of solar box cookers
Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences
Article 11, Volume 17, Issue 2, June 2024, Pages 178-191 PDF (807.91 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30772/qjes.2024.148577.1187
Authors
Ekram H Alaskaree^* ¹; Ahmed A. Alammar^* ²^{, 3}
¹Mechanical Department University of Technology-Iraq, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq
²Centre for Sustainable Cooling, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
³Energy and Bioproducts Research Institute (EBRI), College of Engineering and Physical Science, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK
Abstract
Solar fireplaces are important in remote areas with abundant solar radiation, they are a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional cooking methods as they do not emit toxic gases. This study aims to experimentally compare solar box cookers of different designs, materials, and features to understand heat transfer and thermal performance to improve overall efficiency. Four different cases with different materials and features of the box structure are studied: Case 1 - non-tinted wooden sides, case 2 - black tinted wooden sides, case 3 - box with glass sides, and Case 4-black tinted wooden sides and coated inside with aluminum foil. Two designs are compared for each case- one with a front flat mirror and one without. All solar fireplaces consist of an inclined glass facing at an angle to the latitude of Baghdad and a base with black fins. The experiments lasted for three months in various weather conditions including cold, hot, dusty, and sunny days in southern Baghdad, Iraq, positioned at Latitude north and longitude East. Factors such as the intensity of incident radiation, wind speed, and ambient air temperature are taken into account during the cooking period. The results indicate that the third glass-sided box achieved the highest thermal efficiency of 93.7% after 120 minutes. The rice was fully cooked in just 97 minutes, the quickest time ever seen with this type of solar cooker, and it had a thermal efficiency of 88%. The fourth box, lined with aluminum foil inside, succeeded the third book with Rice reaching ripeness at 110 minutes with an 80.5% efficiency.
Keywords
Aluminum sheets; Box solar cooker; Flat mirror; Glass sides; Refrigerator radiator; Matte dark black color
Supplementary Files 011 -QJES-2404-1187.pdf
References
Herez, M. Ramadan, and M. Khaled, “Review on solar cooker systems : Economic and environmental study for di ff erent Lebanese scenarios,” vol. 81, no. February 2017, pp. 421–432, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.021. Mawire, K. Lentswe, P. Owusu, A. Shobo, and J. Darkwa, “Performance comparison of two solar cooking storage pots combined with wonderbag slow cookers for off-sunshine cooking Performance comparison of two solar cooking storage pots combined with wonderbag slow cookers for off-sunshine cooking,” Sol. Energy, vol. 208, no. September, pp. 1166–1180, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.053. Aramesh, M. Ghalebani, A. Kasaeian, and H. Zamani, “A review of recent advances in solar cooking technology,” Renew. Energy, vol. 140, pp. 419–435, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.021. Soria-Verdugo, “Energy for Sustainable Development Experimental analysis and simulation of the performance of a box-type solar cooker,” Energy Sustain. Dev., vol. 29, pp. 65–71, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2015.09.006. Balzar, W. Eisenmann, S. Wendt, H. Ackermann, and K. Vajen, single and double-stage heat pipe coupled solar cooking systems for high temperatures, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2001. S. Negi and I. Purohit, “Experimental investigation of a box type solar cooker employing a non-tracking concentrator,” 2004. T. Shaobing Wu , Changmei Wang, “Optical efficiency and performance optimization of a two-stage secondary reflection hyperbolic solar concentrator using machine learning.” pp. 437–449, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.117. Geddam, G. K. Dinesh, and T. Sivasankar, “ScienceDirect Determination of thermal performance of a box type solar cooker,” Sol. Energy, vol. 113, no. March 2015, pp. 324–331, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.01.014. Wikipedia, “Solar zenith angle See also.” pp. 1–3, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_zenith_angle Zhao, H. Zheng, B. Sun, C. Li, and Y. Wu, “Development and performance studies of a novel portable solar cooker using a curved Fresnel lens concentrator,” Sol. Energy, vol. 174, no. September, pp. 263–272, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.09.007 Vengadesan and R. Senthil, “Experimental investigation of the thermal performance of a box type solar cooker using a fi nned cooking vessel American Society of Agricultural Engineers Bureau of Indian Standards,” Renew. Energy, vol. 171, pp. 431–446, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.130. P. Sethi, D. S. Pal, and K. Sumathy, “Performance evaluation and solar radiation capture of optimally inclined box type solar cooker with parallelepiped cooking vessel design,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 81, pp. 231–241, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.02.041. R. V. Gulsavin Guruprasad Engoor, S. Shanmugam, “Energy and exergy based study on a box type solar cooker coupled with a Fresnel lens magnifier.” International Journal of Green Energy, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2022.2043868 O. F. S. & TECHNOLOGY, 5 Cambridge Court, 210 Shepherds Bush Road, London, and W. 7NJ, “cooking food.pdf.” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.ifst.org/lovefoodlovescience/resources/cooking-foo E. C. Na and C. Hipertensiva, “heat transfer theory heat,” in chapter 5. Saxena and N. Agarwal, “Performance characteristics of a new hybrid solar cooker with air duct,” Sol. Energy, vol. 159, no. November 2017, pp. 628–637, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.043. Riva, “Design and performance evaluation of solar cookers for developing countries : The case of Mutoyi , Burundi,” no. May, pp. 1–15, 2017, doi: 10.1002/er.3783. B.C. Anilkumar, Ranjith Maniyeri, S, “Performance Comparison of Different Geometries of Thermal Energy Storage Unit for Solar Cooker,” Recent Adv. Therm. Sci. Eng., pp. 15–26, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7214-0_2. M. Nahar, “Design , development and testing of a double reflector hot box solar cooker with a transparent insulation material,” vol. 1481, no. June 2001, 2016, doi: 10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00178-6. Mahavar, N. Sengar, P. Rajawat, M. Verma, and P. Dashora, “Design development and performance studies of a novel Single Family Solar Cooker,” Renew. Energy, vol. 47, no. 1110161, pp. 67–76, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.04.013. Kumar, “Estimation of design parameters for thermal performance evaluation of box-type solar cooker,” Renew. Energy, vol. 30, pp. 1117–1126, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2004.09.004. Mostafaeipour, M. Behzadian, and M. Bagher, “A strategic model to identify the factors and risks of solar cooker manufacturing and use : A case study of Razavi Khorasan , Iran,” Energy Strateg. Rev., vol. 33, no. November 2020, p. 100587, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2020.100587. Tibebu, “Design , Construction , and Evaluation of the Performance of Dual-Axis Sun Trucker Parabolic Solar Cooker and,” J. Renew. Energy, vol. 2021, 2021, doi: doi.org/10.1155/2021/8944722. Saxena, V. Goel, and M. Karakilcik, “Solar Food Processing and Cooking Methodologies,” Springer Nat. Singapore Pte, no. March, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-7206-2 Atmane, N. El Moussaoui, K. Kassmi, O. Deblecker, and N. Bachiri, “DEVELOPMENT OF AN INNOVATIVE COOKER ( HOT PLATE ) WITH PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR ENERGY,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 36, no. May 2020, p. 102399, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102399. M. Khallaf, M. A. Tawfik, A. A. El-sebaii, and A. A. Sagade, “Mathematical modeling and experimental validation of the thermal performance of a novel design solar cooker,” Sol. Energy, vol. 207, no. May, pp. 40–50, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.069. G. Engoor, S. Shanmugam, and A. R. Veerappan, “Experimental investigation of a box-type solar cooker incorporated with Fresnel lens magnifier,” Energy Sources, Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1080/15567036.2020.1826009. A. Mustafa Fouad Yousif and Theeb, “A review of solar air collectors with baffles and porous medium : Type and applicatios Mustafa Fouad Yousif,” Al-Qadisiyah J. Eng. Sci., vol. 16, pp. 37–41, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.30772/qjes.v16i1.841 Adun, I. Wole-osho, E. C. Okonkwo, and D. Kavaz, “A critical review of specific heat capacity of hybrid nanofluids for thermal energy applications,” no. July, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116890. Schwarzer and M. Euge, “Characterisation and design methods of solar cookers,” vol. 82, pp. 157–163, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2006.06.021. Saxena, E. Cuce, G. N. Tiwari, and A. Kumar, “Design and thermal performance investigation of a box cooker with flexible solar collector tubes: An experimental research,” Energy, p. 118144, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118144 I. Units and M. Engineering, Wayne State University College of College in Detroit, “Property tables and charts (si units) 1”. Irshad, A. I. Khan, S. A. Irfan, M. M. Alam, A. Almalawi, and M. H. Zahir, “Utilizing Artificial Neural Network for Prediction of Occupants Thermal Comfort: A Case Study of a Test Room Fitted with a Thermoelectric Air-Conditioning System,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 99709–99728, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2985036.
Statistics Article View: 430 PDF Download: 316