Al-Soudany, K., Fattah, M., Rahil, F. (2024). Clay barriers performance in landfills: A review.. , 42(11), 1327-1342. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.148162.1724
Kawther Y. Al-Soudany; Mohammed Y. Fattah; Falah H. Rahil. "Clay barriers performance in landfills: A review.". , 42, 11, 2024, 1327-1342. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.148162.1724
Al-Soudany, K., Fattah, M., Rahil, F. (2024). 'Clay barriers performance in landfills: A review.', , 42(11), pp. 1327-1342. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.148162.1724
Al-Soudany, K., Fattah, M., Rahil, F. Clay barriers performance in landfills: A review.. , 2024; 42(11): 1327-1342. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.148162.1724

Clay barriers performance in landfills: A review.

Engineering and Technology Journal
Volume 42, Issue 11, November 2024, Pages 1327-1342    PDF (1.12 M)
Document Type: Review Paper
DOI: 10.30684/etj.2024.148162.1724
Authors
Kawther Y. Al-Soudany* ; Mohammed Y. Fattah; Falah H. Rahil
Civil Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.
Abstract
Clay barriers have garnered much interest in environmental engineering because they successfully reduce various ecological dangers, including groundwater contamination, the migration of leachate from landfills, and waste disposal in landfills. This review paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the features, uses, and performance of clay barriers in various environmental conditions. The problem this review paper addresses is the dangers of waste disposal sites, which emphasizes landfills' harm to the ecosystem and explains why natural clays are often employed as barriers surrounding landfills to keep out pollution. The paper aims to provide an update on essential subjects about barrier system performance difficulties for landfills and their function in reducing the effects of pollutants on the surrounding environment. When designing physical barriers, it is essential to account for a certain amount of material degradation and ensure that the barriers will work for the time needed to achieve landfill sustainability.Subsequently, the elements that affect clay barrier performance are discussed in the study. These variables include long-term stability, chemical compatibility, hydraulic conductivity, and compaction techniques. The usefulness of clay barriers in practical applications is shown via case studies and experimental results. This illustrates the role of clay barriers in preventing the spread of pollutants and safeguarding natural resources.The paper also covers current advancements and new directions in clay barrier technology. These advancements include the use of nanomaterials, barriers made of geopolymers, and innovative construction techniques. The paper also addresses challenges related to the effects of aging, maintenance needs, and regulatory issues. It also provides viable ways to address these obstacles.

Highlights
  • Installing a liner system keeps wastes separate from the environment and attenuates leachate contaminants
  • Weather, compaction degree, and solid waste composition influence leachate production
  • Bottom liner permeability is crucial in determining contamination transport through liner systems
  • Clays are locally accessible and cost-effective for landfill containment at or near dumping sites
Keywords
Barrier performance; landfill liner; Review; leachate pollutants; Compacted clays
References
  1. Q. Tang, Y. Zhang, Y. F. Gao, F. Gu, Use of Cement-Chelated Solidified MSWI Fly Ash for Pavement Material: Mechanical and Environmental Evaluations, Can. Geotech. J., 54 (2017) 1553-1566. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0007
  2. Q. Tang, F. Gu, F. Gao, T. Inui, T. Katsumi, Desorption Characteristics of Cr(III), Mn(II) and Ni(II) in Contaminated Soil Using Citric Acid and Citric Acid Containing Wastewater, Soils Found.,58 (2018) 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.12.001
  3. Q. Tang, H. J. Kim, K. Endo, T. Katsumi, T. Inui, Size effect on lysimeter test evaluating the properties of construction and demolition waste leachate, Soils Found., (JGS). 55 (2015) 720-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.06.005
  4. E. Q. Shehab, Z. B Mohammed and , M. Y. Fattah, Investigation of Characteristics Landfill leachate using Large Scale Lysimeter under Anaerobic Conditions, J. Univ. Shanghai Sci. Technol., 23 (2021) 70-82. http://doi.org/10.51201/Jusst12537
  5. T.L Zhan, C. Guan, H. J. Xie, Y. M. Chen, Vertical migration of leachate pollutants in clayey soils beneath an uncontrolled landfill at huainan, china: a field and theoretical investigation, Sci. Total Environ., 470-471(2014) 290-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.081
  6. G.E. Blight, Graded landfill requirements in South Africa-the climatic water balance classification, Waste Manage. Res., 24 (2006) 482-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X06068516
  7. NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), China Statistical Yearbook (in Chinese), China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2013.
  8. I.V. Sibiya, O.I. Olukunle, O.J. Okonkwo, Seasonal variations and the influence of geomembrane liners on the levels of pbdes in landfill leachates, sediment and groundwater in Gauteng province, south Africa, Emerg. Contam., 3 (2017) 76-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2017.05.002
  9. J. N. Hahladakis, A. Siddiqua, W. A. Al-Attiya, An overview of the environmental pollution and health effects associated with waste landfilling and open dumping, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 29 (2022) 18127-18139.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21578-z
  10. A. A. Salem, Z. B. Mohammed, M. Y. Fattah, Leachate Properties of Municipal Solid Waste in Laboratory Landfill, Adv. Mech., 9 (2021) 143-150.
  11. R. K. Rowe and W. Brachman, Assessment of equivalence of composite liners, Geosynth. Int., 11 (2004) 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2004.11.4.273
  12. J. Hou, J. Li and Y.,Chen, Coupling effect of landfill leachate and temperature on the microstructure of stabilized clay, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 78 (2019) 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1099-z
  13. European Commission, Council Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste, Off. J. Comm'n., (O.J.E.C.), L 182 of 16.07, (1999) 26.
  14. G. Rajasekaran, K. Murali, S. Nagan, Amoudhavally, V., Santhaswaruban, V., Contaminant transport modelling in marine clays, Ocean Eng., 32 (2005) 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.06.010
  15. G. Ozbay, M. Jones, M. Gadde, S. Isah, and T. Attarwala, Design and Operation of Effective Landfills with Minimal Effects on the Environment and Human Health, J. Environ. Public Health, (2021) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6921607
  16. A. Al-Suraifi, Simulation of Contaminants Transport and Groundwater Flow for Basrah Landfill Site, Eng. Technol. J., P. A, 35 (2017) 560-570. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.35.6A.2
  17. P.J. Fox, J.D .Ross‏, Relationship between NP GCL Internal and HDPE GMX/NP GCL Interface Shear Strengths, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 137 (2011) 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000490
  18. H. Xie, C. Zhang, S. Feng, Q. Wang, H. Yan, Analytical model for degradable organic contaminant transport through a GMB/GCL/AL system, J. Environ. Eng., 144 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001338
  19. K. Y. H. Al-Soudany, M. Y. Fattah, F. H. Rahil, A comprehensive review of new trends in the use of geosynthetics clay liner GCLs in landfill, J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng., 11 (2023) 124-130. https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/2758
  20. H. Yan, H. Xie, H. Ding, D. Yang, C. Chen, Y. Chen, Y. Chen, Analytical solutio for one-dimensional steady-state contaminant transport through a geomembrane layer (GMBL)/compacted clay layer (CCL)/attenuation layer (AL) composite liner considering consolidation, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geéomeéch, 46 (2022) 1046–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3334
  21. J. Qiu, L. Jiang, H. Pu, D. Song, M. Min, J. Tong, Analytical solutions for contaminant transport through a GMB/CCL composite liner system considering effective porosity and thermodiffusion, Geotech.,163 (2023) 105713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105713
  22. F. Parastar, S. M. Hejazi, M. Sheikhzadeh, A. Alirezazadeh, A parametric study on hydraulic conductivity and self-healing properties of geotextile clay liners used in landfills, J. Manage., 202 (2017) 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.013
  23. H. Wu, Q. Wen, L. Hu, M. Gong, Z. Tang, Feasibility study on the application of coal gangue as landfill liner material, Waste Manage., 63 (2017) 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.016
  24. E. Adar and M. S. Bilgili, The Performance of Four Different Mineral Liners on the Transportation of Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds to Groundwater in Landfills, Sci. World. J., (2015) 171284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.016
  25. Wei, Z., Shi, S., Shengwei, W., Haoqing, X., Xihui, F., Jianping, B., Fanlu, M,. Patent. Municipal solid waste landfill barrier system capable of prolonging breakthrough time of leachate and manufacturing method thereof, US2018016766 (A1), 2018.
  26. D. J. Kong, H. Wu, H. N., J. C. Chai, A. Arulrajah, State-of-the- Art Review of Geosynthetic Clay Liners, Sustainability, 9 (2017) 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112110
  27. R. K. Rowe, and H. P. Sangam, Durability of HDPE geomembranes, Geotext. Geomembr., 20 (2002) 77-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(02)00005-5
  28. R. K. Rowe, H. P. Sangam, C. B. Lake, Evaluation of an HDPE geomembrane after 14 years as a leachate lagoon liner, Can. Geotech. J. NRC Canada, 40 (2003) 536–550. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-019
  29. F. Louati, H. Trabelsi, M. Jamei, S. Taibi, Impact of wetting-drying cycles and cracks on the permeability of compacted clayey soil, Eur. J. Environ. Civ. En., 25 (2018) 696-721. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2018.1541144
  30. N. Yesiller, C. Miller, G. Inci, K. Yaldo, Desiccation and Cracking Behavior of Three Compacted Landfill Liner Soils, Eng. Geol., 57 (2002) 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00022-3
  31. Allen, A., Containment landfills: the myth of sustainability, Eng. Geol., 60, 3-19, ASTM D 4318 Standard Test Methods for Plastic Limit of Soils, 2015 (American Standard).
  32. S. F. Thornton, D. N. Lerner, M. L. Bright, J. H. Tellam, The Role of Attenuation in Landfill Liners. Proc. Sardinia 93, 4th Int. Landfill Symp. (T. H. Christensen, R. Cossu, R. Stegmann, eds), CISA-Environmental Sanitary Engineering Centre, Cagliari, Sardinia, (2015) 407-416.
  33. S. F. Thornton, M. I. Bright, D. N. Lerner, J. H. Tellam, P. K. Scott, Laboratory studies of landfill leachate attenuation by clay liner materials, Proc. Sardinia 97, 6th Int. Landfill Symp. (T.H. Christensen, R. Cossu, R. Stegmann, eds), CISA-Environmental Sanitary Engineering Centre, Cagliari, Sardinia, (1997) 65-75.
  34. Beaven, R., Potter, H., Powrie, W., Simoes, A., Smallman, D., Stringfellow, Attenuation of organic contaminants in leachate by mineral landfill liners, Environment Agency, Integrated Catchment Science programme, Science report: SC020039/SR5 Project record, 2009.
  35. Kaza S., Yao Lisa C., Bhada-Tata P., Van Woerden F., What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Urban Development, Washington, DC. ©World Bank, 2018.
  36. M. K. Widomski, W. Stepniewski, Musz-Pomorska, Clays of Different Plasticity as Materials for Landfill Liners in Rural Systems of Sustainable Waste Management, Sustainability, 10 (2018) 2489. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072489
  37. C. F. A. Akayuli, S. S. R. Gidigasu, S. K. Y. Gawu, Geotechnical evaluation of a Ghanaian black cotton soil for use as clay liner in tailings dam construction, Ghana Min. J., 14 (2013) 21–26.
  38. A. solomon and E. Poulose, A Comprehensive Review on Landfill Liner, Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., 5 (2018) 621-628.
  39. Department of the Environment , Waste management paper No 27. Landfill gas. HMSO, London, 1989.
  40. H. D. Robinson and J. Gronow, A review of landfill leachate composition in the UK. Proc 4th Int Landftll Symp, 11-15 Oct 1993, Sardinia, 1993.
  41. Y.-L..Yang, K. R. Reddy, T. Zhang, R-D. Fan, -L Fu, Y.-J. Du, Enhanced contaminant retardation by novel modified calcium bentonite backfill in slurry trench cutoff walls, Constr. Build. Mater., 320 (2022) 126285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126285
  42. EC directive on protection of groundwater against pollution caused by certain dangerous substances (1990). EC Directive 80/68/EEC, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
  43. I. Ahmad, N. Abdullah, Chelliapan, A. Yuzir, I. Koji, A. Al-Dailami and T. Arumugham, Effectiveness of Anaerobic Technologies in the Treatment of Landfill Leachate, Solid Waste Manage., 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94741
  44. A.N. Amadi, I.A. Okunlola, C.J. Eze, M.O. Jimoh, C.I. Unuevho, F. Abubakar, Geotechnical Assessment of Clay Deposits in Minna, North-Central Nigeria for Use as liners in Sanitary Landfill Design and Construction, Am. J. Environ. Prot., 3 (2015) 67-75.
  45. Christensen, T.H., R. Cossu, and R. Stegmann, Sanitary Landfilling: Process, Technology and Environmental Impact, London, Academic Press, 2012.
  46. Hughes, K. L., Christy, A. D., & Heimlich, J. E., Landfill Types and Liner Systems, Ohio State Fact Sheet, 2005.
  47. Yesiller, N. and C. D. Shackelford, Chapter 13: Geoenvironmental Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering Handbook, Edited by: B. M. Das, Fort Lauderdale, United States: J.Ross Publishing, 2010.
  48. Tchobanoglous, G. and F. Kreith, Handbook of Solid Waste Management, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
  49. N. A. Jasim and J. A. K. Ibrahim, Stabilization of Al-Rustamiva Waste Water Treatment Plant Sludge Using Lime, J. Eng., 26 (2020) 165-172. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2020.09.11
  50. A. Allen, Containment Landfills: The Myth of Sustainability, Eng. Geol., 60 (2001) 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00084-3
  51. M. Ş .Özçoban, S. Acarer, N. Tüfekci, Effect of solid waste landfill leachate contaminants on hydraulic conductivity of landfill liners, Water Sci Technol., 85 (2022)1581-1599. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.033
  52. A. A. Salim, Z. B. Mohammed, M. Y. Fattah, Influence of adding plant fly ash on the geotechnical properties and pollution of sanitary landfill soil, Eng. Technol. J., 40 (2022) 1385- 1398. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.2022.132687.1136
  53. T. Katsumi, C. H. Benson, G. J. Foose, and M. Kamon, Performance-Based Design of Landfill Liners, Eng. Geol., 60 (2001) 139-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00096-X
  54. M. P. Patil, S. S. Quadri and H. Lakshmikantha, H., Alternative materials for landfill liners and covers, Guntur, IGC., (2009) 301–303.
  55. N. Hamdi & E. Srasra, Hydraulic Conductivity Study of Compacted Clay Soils Used as Landfill Liners for an Acidic Waste, Waste Manage., 33 (2013) 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.012
  56. Zhou, Clay landfill liners subject to variable interfacial redox and pH conditions-heavy metal and clay interactions; LSU Doctoral Dissertations, 2003. https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.3493
  57. G. Rajasekaran, K. Murali, S. Nagan, V. Amoudhavally, V. Santhaswaruban, Contaminant transport modelling in marine clays, Ocean Eng., 32 (2005) 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.06.010
  58. Rowe, R.K., Quigley, R.M., Brachman, R.W.I., Booker, J.R., Rowe, R.K., Quigley, R.M., Barrier systems for waste disposal facilities, 1243-1243, 2004.
  59. .H. Xie, C. Zhang, S. Feng, Q. Wang, H. Yan, Analytical model for degradable organic contaminant transport through a GMB/GCL/AL system, J. Environ Eng., 144 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001338
  60. E. Kavazanjian, N. Dixon, T. Katsumi, A. Kortegast, P. Legg, H.  Zanzinger,  Geosynthetic barriers for environmental protection at landfills. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Geosynthetics, 8 ICG, Yokohama, Japan, 2006.
  61. F. Parastar, S. M. Hejazi, M. Sheikhzadeh, A. Alirezazadeh, A parametric study on hydraulic conductivity and self-healing properties of geotextile clay liners used in landfills, J. Environ. Manage., 202 (2017) 29-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.013
  62. H. Wu, Q. Wen, L. Hu, M. Gong, Z. Tang, Feasibility study on the application of coal gangue as landfill liner material, Waste Manage., 63 (2017) 161-171.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.016
  63. Y. Mohamedzein, A. Al-Ghaithi, M. Al-Aghbari, B. Tabook, Assessment of dune sand-bentonite mixtures for use as landfill liners, J. Solid Waste Technol. Manage., 42 (2016) 25-34.https://doi.org/10.5276/JSWTM.2016.25
  64. A. Allen, Containment landfills: the myth of sustainability, Eng. Geol., 60 (2001) 3-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00084-3
  65. R. A. Griffin, N. F. Shimp, J. D. Steele, R. R. Ruch, W. A. White, G. M. Hughes, Attenuation of pollutants in municipal landfill leachate by passage through clay, Environ. Sci. Technol., 10 (1976) 1262- 1268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es60123a006
  66. M. Regadío, A. I. Ruiz, M. Rodríguez-Rastrero, J. Cuevas, Containment and attenuating layers: An affordable strategy that preserves soil and water from landfill pollution, Waste Manage., 46 (2015) 408-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.014
  67. M. Regadío, J. A. Black, S. F. Thornton, The Role of Natural Clays in The Sustainability of Landfill Liners, Multi, Waste Resour. Residue., 12 (2020) 100-113. https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2020.13946
  68. Q. Tang, F. Gue, Zhanga, Y. Zhangd, J. Mob, Impact of biological clogging on the barrier performance of landfill liners, J. Environ. Manage., 222 (2018) 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.039
  69. R. A. Griffin, N. F. Shimp, J. D. Steele, R. R. Ruch, W. A. White, G. M. Hughes, Attenuation of pollutants in municipal landfill leachate by passage through clay, Environ. Sci. Technol., 10 (1976) 1262-1268. https://doi.org/10.1021/es60123a006
  70. E. Koutsopoulou, D. Papoulis, P. Tsolis-Katagas, M. Kornaros, Clay minerals used in sanitary landfills for the retention of organic and inorganic pollutants, Appl. Clay Sci., 49 (2010) 372-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.05.004
  71. B. J. Teppen and D. M. Miller, Hydration Energy Determines Isovalent Cation Exchange Selectivity by Clay Minerals, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70 (2006) 31. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0212
  72. B. C. Raymahashay, A comparative study of clay minerals for pollution control, J. Geol. Soc. India, 30 (1987) 408-413.
  73. S. F. Thornton, D. N. Lerner, J. H. Tellam, Attenuation of landfill leachate by clay liner materials in laboratory columns: 2. Behaviour of inorganic contaminants, Waste Manag. Res., 19 (2001) 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X0101900108
  74. M. Regadío, I. S. de Soto, M. Rodríguez-Rastrero, M., A. I. Ruiz, M. J. Gismera, J. Cuevas, Processes and impacts of acid discharges on a natural substratum under a landfill, Sci. Total Environ., 463 (2013) 1049-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.047
  75. M. Regadío, A. I. Ruiz, I. S. de Soto, M. Rodriguez-Rastrero, N. Sánchez, M. J. Gismera, M. T. Sevilla, P. da Silva, J. Rodríguez-Procopio, J. Cuevas, Pollution profiles and physicochemical parameters in old uncontrolled landfills, Waste Manage., 32 (2012) 482-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.008
  76. T. L. T. Zhan, C. Guan, H. J. Xie, Y. M. Chen, Vertical migration of leachate pollutants in clayey soils beneath an uncontrolled landfill at Huainan, China: A field and theoretical investigation, Sci. Total Environ., 470 (2014) 290-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.081
  77. M. Batchelder, J. D. Mather, J. B. Joseph, The Stability of the Oxford Clay as a Mineral Liner for Landfill, Water Environ. J., 12 (1988) 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.1998.tb00155.x
  78. M. I. Bright, S. F. Thornton, D. N. Lerner and J. H. Tellam, Attenuation of landfill leachate by clay liner materials in laboratory columns: 1. Experimental procedures and behaviour of organic contaminants, Waste Manag. Res., 18 (2000) 198-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X0001800302
  79. R. Taylor and A. Allen, Waste disposal and landfill: information In O. Schmoll, G. Howard, J. Chilton, I. Chorus: (Eds.), Protecting Groundwater for Health: Managing the Quality of Drinking-water Sources, London, 2006.
  80. S. F. Thornton, M. I. Bright, D. N. Lerner, J. H. Tellam, Attenuation of landfill leachate by UK Triassic sandstone aquifer materials Sorption and degradation of organic pollutants in laboratory columns, J. Contam. Hydrol., 43 (2000) 355-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7722(99)00105-9
  81. E. Adar, and M. S., Bilgili, The Performance of Four Different Mineral Liners on the Transportation of Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds to Groundwater in Landfills, Sci. World. J., (2015) 171284. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/171284
  82. D. M. Martill, M. A. Taylor, K. L. Duff, J. B. Riding, P. R. Bown, The trophic structure of the biota of the Peterborough Member, Oxford Clay Formation (Jurassic), UK., J. Geol. Soc.,151 (1994) 173-194. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.151.1.0173
  83. C. A. Fannin, An evaluation of the chemical attenuation capacity of UK mineral liner and geological barrier materials for landfill leachate components, Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydroge., 39 (2006) 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/04-073
  84. I. St. J. Fisher and J. D. Hudson, Pyrite formation in Jurassic shales of contrasting biofacies, Geol. Soc. London, Sp. Publ., 26 (1987) 69-78. https://doi.org/1144/GSL.SP.1987.026.01.04
  85. J. B. Christensen, D. L. Jensen, T. H. Christensen, Effect of dissolved organic carbon on the mobility of cadmium, nickel and zinc in leachate polluted groundwater, Water Res., 30 (1996) 3037-3049. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00091-7
  86. S.K. Gregson, R.D. Roberts, J.M. Roberts, The fate of heavy metals in co‐disposed refuse, Environ. Technol. Lett., 9 (2008) 983- 990. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593338809384660
  87. C. A. Fannin, An evaluation of the chemical attenuation capacity of UK mineral liner and geological barrier materials for landfill leachate components, Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydroge., 39 (2006) 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/04-073
  88. P. M. Scotney, J. B. Joseph, J. E. A. Marshall, M. J. Lowe, I. W. Croudace, , J. A. Milton, Geochemical and mineralogical properties of the Lower Callovian (Jurassic) Kellaways Sand, variations in trace element concentrations and implications for hydrogeological risk assessment. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydroge., 45 (2012) 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/11-005
  89. .J. D. Hudson, and D. M. Martill, The Peterborough Member (Callovian, Middle Jurassic) of the Oxford Clay Formation at Peterborough, UK. J Geol. Soc. London, 151 (1994) 113. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.151.1.0113
  90. F. M. McEvoy, D. Minchin, D. J. G. Harrison, D. Cameron, E. J. Steadman, S. F. Hobbs, N. A. Spencer, D. J. Evans, G. K. Lott, D. E. Highley, Mineral Resource information in Support of National, Regional and Local Planning: West Yorkshire (comprising Metropolitan Boroughs of Bradford, Calderdale, Kirklees and Wakefield and City of Leeds), Commissioned Report, CR/04/172N (pp. 209): British Geological Survey, 2016.
  91. I. L.Freeman, Mineralogy of ten british brick clays, Clay Miner. B., 5 (1964) 474-486.
  92. Comparing Liner Types With GCL- ABG Geosynthetic, https://www.abg-geosynthetics.com/technical/landfill/comparing-liner-types-with-gcl/.\
  93. M. Wasil, Effect of bentonite addition on the properties of fly ash as a material for landfill sealing layers, Appl. Sci., 10 (2020) 1488. https://doi.org/3390/app10041488
  94. I. Arathy and J. Aparna Sai, Effect of pore fluids on some geotechnical properties of soil-rice husk ash mixture as barriers, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., 5 (2017) 1–4.
  95. V. Giridhar and S. Dharani, An experimental study on bentonite and quarry dust mixture to use as a landfill liner. SSRG Int. J. Civ. Eng. 5 (2018) 23–27. https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V5I10P104
  96. K. Y. H. Al-Soudany, Remediation of clayey soil using silica fume, The 3rd Int. Conf. on Buildings, Construction and Environmental Engineering, BCEE3-2017 162, 2017, 01017. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816201017
  97. S. Joseph and M. Varghese M, Study on amended landfill liner using bentonite and zeolite mixtures, Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., 4 (2017) 1130–1133.
  98. N. Nambiar, N. Remya and G. K. Varghese, Effective reuse of waste material as an amendment in composit liner: assessment of geotechnical properties and pollutant retention capacity, Waste Manag. Res., 38 (2020) 134–141. https://doi.org/1177/0734242X19886920
  99. D. Devarajan and A. Sasikumar, Suitability of marble dust-soil composite as landfill liner material, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., 3 (2015) 1–6. https://doi.org/17577/IJERTCONV3IS29019
  100. Kantesaria, N., Chandra, P. and Sachan, A. Geotechnical behaviour of fly ash-bentonite mixture as a liner material.In: Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference; Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Springer, Singapore,
  101. S. Rout and S. P. Singh, Characterization of pond ashbentonite mixes as landfill liner material, Waste Manag. Res., 38 (2020) 1420–1428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x20918013
  102. S. K. Pal and A. Ghosh, Hydraulic conductivity of fly ash–montmorillonite clay mixtures, Indian Geotech. J., 43 (2013) 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-012-0033-3
  103. V. Srikanth and A. K. Mishra., A laboratory study on the geotechnical characteristics of sand–bentonite mixtures and the role of particle size of sand, Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng., 2 (2016) 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-015-0043-1
  104. A. K. Mishra and V. Ravindra, On the utilization of fly ash and cement mixtures as a landfill liner material, Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng., 1 (2015) 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-015-0019-1
  105. V. Alla, S. K. Sasmal, R. N. Behera and C. Patra, Development of alternate liner material by blending fly ash, local soil and Bentonite. In: Indian Geotechnical Conf., 2017.
  106. M. Devarangadi., Use of ground granulated blast furnace slag blended with bentonite and cement mixtures as a liner in a landfill to retain diesel oil contaminants, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 7 (2019) 103360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103360
  107. S. L. Nisha and R. Roy, Design of amended landfill liner using nano silica, Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., 5 (2018) 1438–1441.
  108. A. Demdoum, M. K. Gueddouda, I. Goual, H. Souli and M. S. Ghembaza, Effect of landfill leachate on the hydromechanical behavior of bentonite-geomaterials mixture, Constr. Build. Mater., 234 (2020) 117356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117356
  109. J. Ochepo, Effect of rice husk ash on the hydraulic conductivity and unconfined compressive strength of compacted Bentonite enhanced waste foundry sand, LAUTECH J. Civ. Environ. Stud., 5 (2020) 85–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.36108/laujoces/0202/50(0190)
  110. S. Cyrus, B. M. Abraham and B. T. Jose, Effect of partia replacement of Bentonite with biochar in liner soils, Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 13 (2021)1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01319-x
  111. D. C. Sekhar and S. Nayak, SEM and XRD investiga-tions on lithomargic clay stabilized using granulated blast furnace slag and cement, Int. J. Geotech. Eng., 13 (2017) 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1380355
  112. K. Y. H. Al-Soudany, A. Al-Gharbawi andM. Al-Noori, Improvement of clayey soil characteristics by using activated carbon, The 3rd Int. Conf. on Buildings, Construction and Environmental Engineering, 62, 2017, 01009. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816201009
  113. M. Y. Fattah, Z. B. Mohammed and E. Q. Shehab, Enhancement of landfill clay liner properties using lime-silica fume mixture, SSRN, 2022.  https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4200293
  114. S. Costa, J. Kodikara, S. L. Barbour, D. G. Fredlund, Theoretical analysis of desiccation crack spacing of a thin, long soil layer, Acta Geotech., 13 (2018) 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-017-0602-9
  115. C. J. Miller, H. Mi, N. Yesiller, Experimental Analysis of Desiccation Crack Propagation in Clay Liners. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34 (1998) 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb00964.x
  116. Y. B. Yamusa, K. Ahmad, N. A. Rahman, Hydraulic conductivity and volumetric shrinkage properties review on gradation effect of compacted laterite soil liner, Malays. J. Civ. Eng., 29 (2017) 153-164. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v29.15689
Statistics
Article View: 928
PDF Download: 530


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com