Ghadhban, M., Rashid, K., Abdulrazak, A., Meskher, H., Benguerba, Y., Yousif Al-Sarraj, E., Alsalhy, Q. (2024). Optimal operational conditions of PLA/PBAT mixed matrix membrane for the treatment of oily wastewater. , 42(9), 1179-1192. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.150993.1774
Maryam Y. Ghadhban; Khalid T. Rashid; Adnan A. Abdulrazak; Hicham Meskher; Yacine Benguerba; Emad A. Yousif Al-Sarraj; Qusay F. Alsalhy. "Optimal operational conditions of PLA/PBAT mixed matrix membrane for the treatment of oily wastewater". , 42, 9, 2024, 1179-1192. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.150993.1774
Ghadhban, M., Rashid, K., Abdulrazak, A., Meskher, H., Benguerba, Y., Yousif Al-Sarraj, E., Alsalhy, Q. (2024). 'Optimal operational conditions of PLA/PBAT mixed matrix membrane for the treatment of oily wastewater', , 42(9), pp. 1179-1192. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.150993.1774
Ghadhban, M., Rashid, K., Abdulrazak, A., Meskher, H., Benguerba, Y., Yousif Al-Sarraj, E., Alsalhy, Q. Optimal operational conditions of PLA/PBAT mixed matrix membrane for the treatment of oily wastewater. , 2024; 42(9): 1179-1192. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.150993.1774

Optimal operational conditions of PLA/PBAT mixed matrix membrane for the treatment of oily wastewater

Engineering and Technology Journal
Volume 42, Issue 9, September 2024, Pages 1179-1192    PDF (1.58 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30684/etj.2024.150993.1774
Authors
Maryam Y. Ghadhban1; Khalid T. Rashid1; Adnan A. Abdulrazak1; Hicham Meskher* 2; Yacine Benguerba3; Emad A. Yousif Al-Sarraj4; Qusay F. Alsalhy1
1Chemical Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.
2Division of Process Engineering, College of Science and Technology, Chadli Bendjedid University, 36000, Algeria.
3Laboratoire de Biopharmacie Et Pharmacotechnie (LPBT), Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1 University, Sétif, Algeria.
4Chemical Engineering Dept., Engineering College, University of Al-Nahrain-Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq.
Abstract
This study aims to optimize the operational variables influencing the incorporation of Hesperidin nanoparticles (HSP NPs) into poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PLA/PBAT) for manufacturing mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) for oily wastewater treatment. An optimization method was employed to determine the optimal values for key process factors to achieve specific flux and rejection rates exceeding required levels. Statistical techniques such as response surface methodology (RSM) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to enhance performance on a larger scale. This research investigated the impact of operating parameters on the flux and oil rejection of PLA/PBAT/HSP membranes across all samples. The variables studied included HSP NPs content (0-0.05 wt.%), oil concentration (100-300 ppm), and transmembrane pressure (1.5-3.5 bar). A mathematical model for calculating flux and rejection (%) was developed. The findings indicated that the PLA/PBAT/HSP-based MMMs demonstrated optimal efficiency, achieving a flux of 121 LMH and oil rejection of 98.53%. The optimal conditions for the HSP MMMs were 0.03 wt.% HSP, an oil concentration of 158.28 ppm, and a pressure of 3.5 bar yielded the best response. The results show that the PLA/PBAT/HSP membranes exhibited enhanced flux and separation properties, making them suitable for treating oily wastewater in various applications.

Highlights
  • A novel method uses Hesperidin (HSP) with PLA/PBAT MMMs to remove oil by simulating oily wastewater.
  • RSM and ANOVA were applied to enhance the technique's large-scale effectiveness.
  • The impact of HSP NPs content, oil concentration, and pressure on MMMs performance was optimized.
  • PLA/PBAT/HSP-based MMMs had optimal efficiency with 121 LMH flux and 98.53% oil rejection.
  • Optimal conditions for HSP MMMs were 0.03 wt.% HSP, 158.28 ppm oil concentration, and 3.5 bar pressure.
Keywords
PLA/PBAT membrane; Response surface methodology; Oil/water separation; Hesperidin; Design-Expert® software
References
  1. K. T. Rashid, H. M. Alayan, A. E. Mahdi, M. N. Al-Baiati, H. Sh. Majdi, I. K. Salih, J. M. Ali, Q. F. Alsalhy, Novel Water-Soluble Poly(terephthalic-co-glycerol-g-fumaric acid) Copolymer Nanoparticles Harnessed as Pore Formers for Polyethersulfone Membrane Modification: Permeability–Selectivity Tradeoff Manipulation, Water, 14 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091507
  2. Q. F. Alsalhy, A. A. Mohammed, S. H. Ahmed, K. T. Rashid, and M. A. AlSaadi, Estimation of nanofiltration membrane transport parameters for cobalt ions removal from aqueous solutions, Desalin. Water Treat., 108 (2018) 235-245. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2018.21929
  3. G. M. Jaid, A. A. AbdulRazak, H. Meskher, S. Al-Saadi, Q. F. Alsalhy, Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs), and hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs) in mixed matrix membranes, Mater. Today Sustain., 25 (2024) 100672. https://doi.org/1016/j.mtsust.2024.100672
  4. Meskher, S.B. Belhaouari, K. Deshmukh, C.M. Hussain, F. Sharifianjazi, A Magnetite Composite of Molecularly Imprinted Polymer and Reduced Graphene Oxide for Sensitive and Selective Electrochemical Detection of Catechol in Water and Milk Samples: An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Application, J. Electrochem. Soc,. 170 (2023) 047502. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/acc97c.
  5. .H. Meskher, A. K. Thakur, F. Sharifianjazi, R. Sathyamurthy, I. Lynch, R. Saidur, MXene‐CNTs: A Prospective Composite Material for Biomedical Applications Engrossing Wearable Sensors , in ACS Symposium Series, 1443, 2023, 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2023-1443.ch004
  6. M. Y. Ghadhban, K. T. Rashid, A. A AbdulRazak, and Q. F. Alsalhy, Recent progress and future directions of membranes green polymers for oily wastewater treatment, Water Sci. Technol., 87 (2023) 57-82. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.409
  7. A. I. Adetunji and A. O. Olaniran, Treatment of industrial oily wastewater by advanced technologies: a review, Appl. Water Sci., 11 (2021) 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01430-4
  8. A. H. Behroozi and M. R. Ataabadi, Improvement in microfiltration process of oily wastewater: A comprehensive review over two decades, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 9 (2021) 104981. https://doi.org/1016/j.jece.2020.104981
  9. S.T. Abdul-Hussein, M.H. Al-Furaiji, H. Meskher, D. Ghernaout, M. Fal, A.M. ALotaibi, Q.F. Alsalhy, Prospects of forward osmosis-based membranes for seawater mining: Economic analysis, limitations and opportunities, Desalination, vol. 579, 2024, 117477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.117477
  10. M. A. Qamar, M. Javed, S. Shahid, and M. Sher, Fabrication of g-C3N4/transition metal (Fe, Co, Ni, Mn and Cr)-doped ZnO ternary composites: Excellent visible light active photocatalysts for the degradation of organic pollutants from wastewater, Mater. Res. Bull., 147 (2022) 111630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2021.111630
  11. É. Nascimbén Santos, Z. László, C. Hodúr, G. Arthanareeswaran, and G. Veréb, Photocatalytic membrane filtration and its advantages over conventional approaches in the treatment of oily wastewater: A review, Asia-Pacific J. Chem. Eng., 15 (2020) 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.2533
  12. J. M. Shihab, K. T. Rashid, and M. A. Toma, A review on membrane technology application for vegetable oil purification processes, Int. J. Food Eng., 18 (2022) 655-677. https://doi.org/1515/ijfe-2022-0058
  13. F. Kazemi, Y. Jafarzadeh, S. Masoumi, and M. Rostamizadeh, Oil-in-water emulsion separation by PVC membranes embedded with GO-ZnO nanoparticles, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 9 (2021) 104992. https://doi.org/1016/j.jece.2020.104992
  14. H. Meskher, F. Achi, Electrochemical Sensing Systems for the Analysis of Catechol and Hydroquinone in the Aquatic Environments: A Critical Review, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. (2022) 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2022.2114784.
  15. M. Y. Ghadhban, K. T. Rashid, A. A. Abdulrazak, I. T. Ibrahim, Q. F. Alsalhy, Z. M. Shakor, I. Hamawand, Banana Peel Additives for Oil Wastewater Treatment, 16 (2024) 1040. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16071040
  16. F. Yalcinkaya, E. Boyraz, J. Maryska, and K. Kucerova, A review on membrane technology and chemical surface modification for the oily wastewater treatment, Materials (Basel)., 13 (2020) 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020493
  17. C. J. Singh, S. Mukhopadhyay, and R. S. Rengasamy, Fibrous coalescence filtration in treating oily wastewater: A review, J. Ind. Text., 51 (2022). https://doi.org/1177/15280837211040863
  18. E. S. Dmitrieva, T. S. Anokhina, E. G. Novitsky, V. V. Volkov, A. V. Volkov, and I. L. Borisov, Polymeric Membranes for Oil-Water Separation: A Review, Polymers (Basel)., 14 (2022) 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14050980
  19. A. Mohamed and S. Yousef, “Green and sustainable membrane fabrication development, Sustain. Technol. Green Econ., 1, (2021)14-23. https://doi.org/10.21595/stge.2021.22126
  20. S. Gadlula, L. N. Ndlovu, N. R. Ndebele, and L. K. Ncube, Membrane technology in tannery wastewater management: A review, Zimbabwe J. Sci. Technol., 14 (2019) 57-72.
  21. S. A. Rahman, K. T. Rashid, and Q. F. Alsalhy, Improvement of PVDF-co-HFP Hollow Fiber Membranes for Direct Contact Membrane Distillation Applications, Indian J. Sci. Technol., 10 (2017) 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i7/111446
  22. V. Vasagar, M. K. Hassan, and M. Khraisheh, Membrane surface modification and functionalization, Membranes, 11 (2021) 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11110877
  23. H. Meskher, S.B. Belhaouari, F. Sharifianjazi, Mini review about metal-organic framework (MOF)-based wearable sensors: Challenges and prospects, Heliyon, 9 (2923) e21621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21621
  24. K. M. Shabeeb, K. M. Shabeeb,W. A. Noori, A. A. Abdulridha, H. Sh. Majdi, M. N. Al-Baiati, A. A. Yahya, K. T. Rashid, Z. Németh, K. Hernadi, Q. F. Alsalhy, Novel partially cross-linked nanoparticles graft co-polymer as pore former for polyethersulfone membranes for dyes removal, Heliyon, 9 (2023) 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21958
  25. H. Meskher, H.C. Mustansar, A.K. Thakur, R. Sathyamurthy, I. Lynch, P. Singh, T. K. Han, R. Saidur, Recent trends in carbon nanotube (CNT)-based biosensors for the fast and sensitive detection of human viruses: a critical review, Nanoscale Adv., 5 (2023) 992-1010. https://doi.org/1039/D2NA00236A
  26. M. A. Qamar, M. Javed, S. Shahid, M. Shariq, M. M. Fadhali, S. K. Ali, M. Sh. Khan, Synthesis and applications of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) based membranes for wastewater treatment: A critical review, Heliyon, 9 (2023) e12685. https://doi.org/1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12685
  27. M. A. Qamar, S. Shahid, and M. Javed, Synthesis of dynamic g-C3N4/Fe@ZnO nanocomposites for environmental remediation applications, Ceram. Int., 46 (2020) 22171-22180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.294
  28. T. W. Abood, M.Shabeeb, A. B. Alzubaydi, H. Meskher , A. K. Lafta , R. A. Al-Juboori , F. Sharifianjazi, K. Hernadi, Q. F. Alsalhy, MXene-based pressure driven membranes for wastewater treatment: A critical review, Desalination Water Treat., 320, (2024) 100594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100594
  29. V. Marturano, A. Marotta, S. A. Salazar, V. Ambrogi, and P. Cerruti, Recent advances in bio-based functional additives for polymers, Prog. Mater. Sci., 139 (2022) 101186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101186
  30. Y. Manawi, V. Kochkodan, E. Mahmoudi, D. J. Johnson, A. W. Mohammad, and M. A. Atieh, Characterization and Separation Performance of a Novel Polyethersulfone Membrane Blended with Acacia Gum, Sci. Rep., 7 (2017) 1-12. https://doi.org/1038/s41598-017-14735-9
  31. A. Fahrina, N. Arahman, S. Mulyati, S. Aprilia, and M. R. Bilad, Characterization of polyethersulfone (PES) membrane entrapping with ginger extract (GE) as a green additive, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 1087 (2021) 12050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1087/1/012050
  32. H. A. Le Phuong, N. A. Izzati Ayob, C. F. Blanford, N. F. Mohammad Rawi, and G. Szekely, Nonwoven Membrane Supports from Renewable Resources: Bamboo Fiber Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) Composites, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 7 (2019) 11885-11893. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02516
  33. H. Idress, S. Z. J. Zaidi, A. Sabir, M. Shafiq, R. U. Khan, C. Harito, S. Hassan & F. C. Walsh, Cellulose acetate based Complexation-NF membranes for the removal of Pb(II) from waste water, Sci. Rep., 11 (2021) 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80384-0
  34. N. Rabiee, Rajni Sharma, Sahar Foorginezhad, Maryam Jouyandeh, Mohsen Asadnia, Mohammad Rabiee, Omid Akhavan, Eder C. Lima, Krzysztof Formela, Milad Ashrafizadeh, Zari Fallah, Mahnaz Hassanpour, Abbas Mohammadi, Mohammad Reza Saeb, Green and Sustainable Membranes: A review, Environ. Res., 231 (2023) 116133. https://doi.org/1016/j.envres.2023.116133
  35. R. I. Raja, K. T. Rashid, M. A. Toma, A. A. AbdulRazak, M. Ahmed Shehab, and K. Hernadi, A Novel Polyethersulfone/Chamomile (PES/Chm) Mixed Matrix Membranes for Wastewater Treatment Applications, J. Saudi Chem. Soc., 28 (2024) 101805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2023.101805
  36. J. M. Shihab, M. A. Toma, A. D. Hussein, and K. T. Rashid, Green Agents as Alternative to N-Hexane for Sunflower Vegetable Oil Degumming and Deacidification via Ultrafiltration Membrane, Chem. Africa, 7 (2024) 281-290. https://doi.org/1007/s42250-023-00757-6
  37. M. Malhotra, M. Pal, and P. Pal, A response surface optimized nanofiltration-based system for efficient removal of selenium from drinking Water, J. Water Process Eng., 33 (2019) 101007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101007
  38. J. Rajewski and A. Dobrzyńska-Inger, Application of response surface methodology (Rsm) for the optimization of chromium(iii) synergistic extraction by supported liquid membrane, Membranes (Basel)., 11 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11110854
  39. M. Inger, A. Dobrzyńska-Inger, J. Rajewski, and M. Wilk, The use of response surface methodology in ammonia oxidation reaction study, J. Chem., 2019 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2641315
  40. Z. M. Shakor, A. A. AbdulRazak, and A. A. Shuhaib, Optimization of process variables for hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde to cinnamyl alcohol over a Pt/SiO2 catalyst using response surface methodology, Chem. Eng. Commun. 209 (2022) 827-843. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2021.1922394
  41. F. Al-Sheikh, F. T. Jasim, Sh. T. Al-Humairi, I. Hussein, A. A. AbdulRazak, Z. M. Shakor & S. Rohani, Adsorption of Blue Cationic Thiazine Dye from Synthetic Wastewater by Natural Iraqi Bentonite Using Response Surface Methodology: Isotherm, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies, Chem. Africa, 6 (2023) 1437-1447. https://doi.org/1007/s42250-023-00591-w
  42. M. Y. Ghadhban, K. T. Rashid, A. A. Abdulrazak, and Q. F. Alsalhy, A novel poly (lactic-acid) and poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blend membrane modified with hesperidin for oily water emulsions separation, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 206 (2024) 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2024.05.020
  43. K. Keawsupsak, Arisa Jaiyu, Julaluk Pannoi, Punthinee Somwongsa, Nopparat Wanthausk, Passakorn Sueprasita, Chutima Eamchotchawalit, Poly(lactic acid)/Biodegradable Polymer Blend for The Preparation of Flat-Sheet Membrane, J. Teknologi, 69 (2014). https://doi.org/11113/jt.v69.3405
  44. K. Valizadeh, A. Heydarinasab, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Bazgir, Preparation of modified membrane of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and evaluation of anti-fouling features and high capability in water/oil emulsion separation, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 126 (2021) 36-49. https://doi.org/1016/j.jtice.2021.07.018
  45. Q. F. Alsalhy, A. Merza, K. T. Rashid, A. Adam, A. Figoli, S. Simone, E. Drioli, Preparation and characterization of poly(vinyl chloride)/polystyrene/ poly(ethylene glycol) hollow-fiber ultrafiltration membranes, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 130 (2013) 989-1004. https://doi.org/1002/app.39221
  46. X. Zhang, C. Wei, Sh. Ma, C. Zhang, Y. Li, D. Chen,Xu, X. Huang., Janus poly (vinylidene fluoride)-graft-(TiO2 nanoparticles and PFDS) membranes with loose architecture and asymmetric wettability for efficient switchable separation of surfactant-stabilized oil/water emulsions, J. Memb. Sci., 640 (2021) 119837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119837
  47. X. Zhu, Z. Yu, H. Zeng, X. Feng, Y. Liu, K. Cao, X. Li, R. Long, Using a simple method to prepare UiO-66-NH2/chitosan composite membranes for oil–water separation, J. Polym. Sci., 138 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50765
  48. I. Veza, M. Spraggon, I. M. R. Fattah, and M. Idris, Response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing engine performance and emissions fueled with biofuel: Review of RSM for sustainability energy transition, Results Eng., 18 (2023) 101213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101213
  49. A. A. Abdulrazak, Z. M. Shakor, and S. Rohani, Optimizing Biebrich Scarlet removal from water by magnetic zeolite 13X using response surface method, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 6 (2018) 6175-6183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.09.043
  50. Y. Guo, Q. Xue, H. Zhang, N. Wang, S. Chang, H. Wang, H. Pangb and Chen, Treatment of real benzene dye intermediates wastewater by the Fenton method: Characteristics and multi-response optimization, RSC Adv., 8 (2018) 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra09404c
  51. B. Jabbari, E. Jalilnejad, K. Ghasemzadeh, and A. Iulianelli, Modeling and optimization of a membrane gas separation based bioreactor plant for biohydrogen production by CFD–RSM combined method, J. Water Process Eng., 43 (2021) 102288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102288
  52. S. Waqas, N. Y. Harun, U. Arshad, A. M. Laziz, S. L. S. Mun, M. R. Bilad, N. A. H. Nordin, A. S. Alsaadi, Optimization of operational parameters using RSM, ANN, and SVM in membrane integrated with rotating biological contactor, Chemosphere, 349 (2024) 140830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140830
  53. V. Vatanpour, S. S. Madaeni, A. R. Khataee, E. Salehi, S. Zinadini, and H. A. Monfared, TiO2 embedded mixed matrix PES nanocomposite membranes: Influence of different sizes and types of nanoparticles on antifouling and performance, Desalination, 292 (2012) 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.02.006
  54. K. T. Rashid, S. B. A. Rahman, and Q. F. Alsalhy, Optimum Operating Parameters for Hollow Fiber Membranes in Direct Contact Membrane Distillation, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 41 (2016) 2647-2658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2178-3
  55. Z. Majid, A. A. AbdulRazak, and W. A. H. Noori, Modification of Zeolite by Magnetic Nanoparticles for Organic Dye Removal, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 44 (2019) 5457-5474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03788-9
  56. K. C. Ho, Y. H. Teow, W. L. Ang, and A. W. Mohammad, Novel GO/OMWCNTs mixed-matrix membrane with enhanced antifouling property for palm oil mill effluent treatment, Sep. Purif. Technol., 177 (2017) 337-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.01.014
  57. D. Da Silva Biron, M. Zeni, C. P. Bergmann, and V. Dos Santos, Analysis of composite membranes in the separation of emulsions sunflower oil/water, Mater. Res., 20 (2017) 843-852. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-0732
  58. Y. J. Lim, S. M. Lee, R. Wang, and J. Lee, Emerging materials to prepare mixed matrix membranes for pollutant removal in water, Membranes , 11 (2021) 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070508
  59. M. R. S. Kebria, M. Jahanshahi, and A. Rahimpour, SiO2 modified polyethyleneimine-based nanofiltration membranes for dye removal from aqueous and organic solutions, Desalination, 367 (2015) 255-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.04.017
  60. T. Mohammadi and A. Esmaeelifar, Wastewater treatment of a vegetable oil factory by a hybrid ultrafiltration-activated carbon process, J. Memb. Sci., 254 (2005) 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.12.037
  61. A. Hussain and M. Al-Yaari, Development of polymeric membranes for oil/water separation, Membranes (Basel)., 11 (2021) 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11010042
  62. T. K. Abbas, K. T. Rashid, and Q. F. Alsalhy, NaY zeolite-polyethersulfone-modified membranes for the removal of cesium-137 from liquid radioactive waste, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 179 (2022) 535-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.02.001
  63. S. M. Hosseini, Afshari,  A.R. Fazlali, S. K. Farahani, S. Bandehali, B. V. Bruggen, E. Bagheripour, Mixed matrix PES-based nanofiltration membrane decorated by (Fe3O4–polyvinylpyrrolidone) composite nanoparticles with intensified antifouling and separation characteristics, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 147 (2019) 390-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.05.025
  64. A. Najjar, S. Sabri, R. Al-Gaashani, V. Kochkodan, and M. A. Atieh, Enhanced fouling resistance and antibacterial properties of novel graphene oxide-arabic gum polyethersulfone membranes, Appl. Sci., 9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9030513
  65. C. N. Matindi,  S. Kadanyo, G. Liu, M. Hu, Y. Hu, Z. Cui, , X. Ma, F. Yan,He, J. Li, Hydrophilic polyethyleneimine-TiO2 hybrid layer on polyethersulfone/sulfonated polysulfone blend membrane with antifouling characteristics for the effective separation of oil-in-water emulsions, J. Water Process Eng., 49 (2022) 102982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102982
  66. S. H. Rasheed, S. S. Ibrahim, Q. F. Alsalhy, and I. K. Salih, Separation of Soluble Benzene from an Aqueous Solution by Pervaporation Using a Commercial Polydimethylsiloxane Membrane, Membranes (Basel)., 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12111040
  67. S. H. Rasheed, S. S. Ibrahim, Q. F. Alsalhy, and H. S. Majdi, Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Membrane for Separation of Soluble Toluene by Pervaporation Process, Membranes (Basel)., 13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030289
  68. D. A. Hussein Al-Timimi, Q. F. Alsalhy, A. A. AbdulRazak, M. A. Shehab, Z. Németh, and K. Hernadi, Optimum operating parameters for PES nanocomposite membranes for mebeverine hydrochloride removal, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 24 (2023) 6779-6790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.247
Statistics
Article View: 1,013
PDF Download: 415


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com