- All Journals
- Al-Qadisiyah University
- Basrah University
- Kirkuk University
- Mosul University
- The Iraqi Borad for Medical Specialization
- University of Anbar
- University of Technology
- Al Mustafa University
- Al-Zahraa University for Women
- Alnoor University
- Kunooz University
- Misan University
- Ninevah University
- Tikrit University
- University of Al-Hamdaniya
- University of Kerbala
3D Finite Element Analysis of Implant-supported Fixed Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated from Fiber-reinforced Composite and Polyetheretherketone. | ||
| Al-Rafidain Dental Journal | ||
| Volume 24, Issue 2, September 2024, Pages 351-362 PDF (598.69 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.33899/rdenj.2024.136413.1175 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Azher Mazin Agha* 1; Ahmed Al-Ali2; Ayad A Abdul-Razzak3 | ||
| 1Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Iraq | ||
| 2Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq | ||
| 3Nawroz University College of Engineering Civil Engineering Department | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Aims: The purpose of this study was to test different design parameters for ISFPD frameworks fabricated from fiber-reinforced composite and polyetheretherketone. Material and Methods: 12 different framework digital designs made using the AutoCAD program were sent to Autodesk Inventor 2023 for finite element analysis (FEA), these designs included 6 different connector designs according to cross-sectional shape and height-to-width ratio as follows: (ellipse3:2, ellipse 4:3, round, ellipse3:4, ellipse2:3 and triangular9:8) with 2 different connector cross-sectional areas (12mm2 and 16mm2) and were presented to the FEA program as two different materials (PEEK and FRC) to study stress distribution and displacement under 800N load. Stress and displacement values were used to determine the suitable framework material, connector cross-sectional area, and design. Results: FEA had resulted in FRC frameworks exhibiting higher resistance to bending than PEEK frameworks. 16mm2 connector cross-sectional area resulted in higher resistance to loading than 12mm2 connectors. Ellipse connectors with 3:2 height-to-width designs also resulted in the highest resistance to bending compared to other designs. Triangular designs resulted in the highest areas of stress concentration among other designs. Conclusions: Framework design should be considered to allow safe usage of PEEK and FRC as framework materials, FRC framework is more resistant to bending, and increasing the height of the connector increases the resistance to bending thus making ellipse designs with higher height-to-width ratio better in resistance to bending, triangular cross-section designs are not recommended. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| PEEK,,; ,،,؛FRC,,; ,،,؛FEA,,; ,،,؛fixed,,; ,،,؛partial,,; ,،,؛denture | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 3,219 PDF Download: 102 |
||