Mousa, Y., Sachit, M., Hasan, A. (2025). A Hierarchical approach for efficient DTM and building footprint extraction from UAV images. , 18(3), 265-271. doi: 10.30772/qjes.2024.151126.1284
Yousif A Mousa; Mourtadha Sarhan Sachit; Ali Fadhil Hasan. "A Hierarchical approach for efficient DTM and building footprint extraction from UAV images". , 18, 3, 2025, 265-271. doi: 10.30772/qjes.2024.151126.1284
Mousa, Y., Sachit, M., Hasan, A. (2025). 'A Hierarchical approach for efficient DTM and building footprint extraction from UAV images', , 18(3), pp. 265-271. doi: 10.30772/qjes.2024.151126.1284
Mousa, Y., Sachit, M., Hasan, A. A Hierarchical approach for efficient DTM and building footprint extraction from UAV images. , 2025; 18(3): 265-271. doi: 10.30772/qjes.2024.151126.1284

A Hierarchical approach for efficient DTM and building footprint extraction from UAV images

Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences
Volume 18, Issue 3, September 2025, Pages 265-271    PDF (7.85 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30772/qjes.2024.151126.1284
Authors
Yousif A Mousa* 1; Mourtadha Sarhan Sachit2; Ali Fadhil Hasan3
1Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Al-Muthanna University, Samawah 66001, Iraq.
2Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriyah 64001, Iraq.
3Department of Geography, College of Education for Humanity Sciences, Al-Muthanna University, Samawah 66001, Iraq.
Abstract
The utilisation of UAV imagery for the creation of digital maps is a compelling subject within the domains of photogrammetry and remote sensing. This work introduces a hierarchical method for automating the process of building, extracting, and outlining using images captured by drones. The flight plan should be initially planned to provide about 60-70\% overlap to guarantee thorough coverage and precise image matching. The altitude of the drone should be adjusted based on the intended resolution to achieve a balance between capturing fine details and covering a larger region. Next, the technique of photogrammetric image matching was utilised to generate orthophotos and the Digital Surface Model (DSM). Moreover, the Digital Terrain Model (DTM) was extracted from the DSM to differentiate non-ground objects, including buildings. Subsequently, building segments were identified by applying a threshold to the difference between the Digital Surface Model (DSM) and the Digital Terrain Model (DTM), enabling accurate extraction of building segments. Finally, building polygons were generated involving two stages: coarse and refined, considering the least squares adjustment process to guarantee accuracy and detail. The proposed method was applied to drone images captured on the campus of Al-Muthanna University in the southwest of Iraq. The qualitative and quantitative investigation indicated that the building polygons obtained were highly promising, with approximately one-meter geometric accuracy. Nevertheless, accurately differentiating between buildings and other human-made structures (such as tents) and resolving issues related to mismatching error still pose significant difficulties, highlighting the need for additional investigation and development.
Keywords
Drones; 2D Regularization; Building Delineation; DSM; and Digital mapping
References
  • [1] Q. Li, L. Mou, Y. Sun, Y. Hua, Y. Shi, and X. Zhu, “A review of building extraction from remote sensing imagery: Geometrical structures and semantic attributes,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens, vol. 62, p. 1–15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3369723
  • W. Liu, M. Yang, M. Xie, Z. Guo, E. Li, L. Zhang, and D. . Wang, “Accurate building extraction from fused dsm and uav images using a chain fully convolutional neural network,” Remote sensing, vol. 11, no. 24, p. 2912, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11242912
  • F. Remondino, L. Barazzetti, F. Nex, M. Scaioni, and D. Sarazzi, “Uav photogrammetry for mapping and 3d modeling: Current status and future perspectives,” In Proceedings of the International
    Conference on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Geomatics (UAV-g): 14-16 September (2011), Zurich, Switzerland (pp. 25-31). International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS), vol. 100, no. 12, p. 3450–3469, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-1-C22-25-2011
  • X. Zhuo, F. Fraundorfer, F. Kurz, and P. Reinartz, “Optimization of openstreetmap building footprints based on semantic information of oblique uav images,” Remote Sensing, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 624, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040624
  • Z. Farajzadeh, M. Saadatseresht, and F. Alidoost, “Automatic building extraction from uav-based images and dsms using deep learning. isprs ann. photogramm,” Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci, vol. 10, no. 1-3, p. 171–177, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-171-2023
  •  J. Zhou, Y. Liu, G. Nie, H. Cheng, X. Yang, X. Chen, and L. Gross, “Building extraction and floor area estimation at the village level in rural china via a comprehensive method integrating uav photogrammetry and the novel edsanet,” Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 20, p. 5175, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14205175
  • A. Shukla and K. Jain, “Automatic extraction of urban land information from unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) data,” Earth Science Informatics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1225–1236, 2020. [Online]. Available:
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00498-x
  •  E. Fissore and F. Pirotti, “Dsm and dtm for extracting 3d building models: advantages and limitations. international archives of the photogrammetry,” Remote Sensing and Spatial Information
    Sciences, vol. 42, pp. 1539–1544, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1539-2019
  • M. Sharma and R. Engineering, “Building footprint extraction from aerial photogrammetric point cloud data using its geometric features,” Journal Build. Engineering, vol. 76, p. 107387, 2023. [Online].
    Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107387
  • Y. Dai, J. Gong, Y. Li, and Q. Feng, “Building segmentation and outline extraction from uav image-derived point clouds by a line growing algorithm,” International Journal of Digital Earth, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1077–1097, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1269841
  • Kokalj and R. Hesse, “Airborne laser scanning raster data visualization: a guide to good practice,” Zaloˇzba ZRC, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3986/9789612549848
  • X. Huang, W. Yuan, J. Li, and L. Zhang, “A new building extraction postprocessing framework for high-spatial-resolution remote-sensing imagery,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 654–668., 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2587324
  • M. Awrangjeb, C. Zhang, and C. S. Fraser, “Building detection in complex scenes thorough effective separation of buildings from trees,” Photogrammetric Engineering Remote Sensing, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 729–745, 2012. 
  • K. F. West, B. N. Webb, J. R. Lersch, S. Pothier, J. M. Triscari, and A. E. Iverson, “Context driven automated target detection in 3d data,” Automatic Target Recognition XIV. SPIE, vol. 5426, p. 133–143, 2004.
    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.542536
  • M. Heitzler and L. Hurni, “Cartographic reconstruction of building footprints from historical maps: A study on the swiss siegfried map,”
    Transactions in GIS, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 442–461, December 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12610
  • S.Wei, T. Zhang, S. Ji, M. Luo, and J. Gong, “Buildmapper: A fully learnable framework for vectorized building contour extraction,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 197, pp. 87–104, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.01.015
  • C. Gevaert, M. Persello, N. C., and V. F., “2018, u. a deep learning approach to dtm extraction from imagery using rulebased training labels,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 142, p. 106–123, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.06.001
  • Mapflow, “Mapflow.ai - ai mapping and imagery analysis platform, version 2.5.0. mapflow.ai.” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://mapflow.ru/
  • Z. Li, J. D. Wegner, and A. Lucchi, “Topological map extraction from overhead images,” Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), p. 642–665, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.01497
  • W. Zhao, C. Persello, and A. Stein, “Building outline delineation: From aerial images to polygons with an improved end-to-end learning framework,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,
    vol. 175, no. 2021, p. 119–131, May 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.02.014
  • W. Liao, X. Lu, Y. Fei, Y. Gu, and Y. Huang, “Generative ai design for building structures,” Automation in Construction, vol. 157, p. 105187, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105187
  • Y. A.-k. Mousa, P. Helmholz, and D. Belton, “New dtm extraction approach from airborne images derived dsm,” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information
    Sciences, vol. XLII-1/W1, p. 75–82, May 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-75-2017
  • Y. A. Mousa, P. Helmholz, D. Belton, and D. Bulatov, “Building detection and regularisation using dsm and imagery information,” The Photogrammetric Record, vol. 34, no. 165, pp. 85–107, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/phor.12275
Statistics
Article View: 1,316
PDF Download: 585


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com