Criteria for distinguishing laws complementary to the constitution from regular laws

Kazem, Farah Salman; Ubeed, Adnan Ajil

doi:10.63677/jqlap.2025.184967

	Criteria for distinguishing laws complementary to the constitution from regular laws
AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences
Volume 16, Issue: 1 part 1, March 2025, Pages 275-290 PDF (711.81 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.63677/jqlap.2025.184967
Authors
Farah Salman Kazem^* ; adnan ajil ubeed
Al-Qadisiyah University/College of Law
Abstract
This research deals with the criteria through which jurisprudence and the constitutional judiciary were legislated, to examine the legal nature of laws complementary to the constitution, and the relationship of these criteria to the classification of those laws, being considered either as regular laws or laws complementary to the constitution. Then the research investigates the effectiveness of those criteria in determining the nature of laws complementary to the constitution. The importance of determining the legal nature of laws complementary to the constitution comes from the importance of the topics they regulate through direct forwarding from the constitution and in the body of its texts. Among those topics are topics that regulate the work of the legislative authority, topics that deal with the work of the executive authority, topics that regulate the judicial authority, in addition to those texts on rights and freedoms. The constitution often sets the main axes and lines and leaves the matters of its organization and the way of exercising its jurisdiction to complementary laws that determine the conditions and set the appropriate mechanism for the work of those authorities.
Keywords
Laws complementary to the Constitution; Formal criterion; Objective criterion; Mixed standard Legal nature

Statistics Article View: 176 PDF Download: 60