Al-Maaine, H., AlHaboubi, N. (2025). An exhaustive review of carbon dioxide capture through the utilization of chemical solvents via absorption. , 43(3), 174-191. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.152635.1799
Hala H. Al-Maaine; Naseer A. AlHaboubi. "An exhaustive review of carbon dioxide capture through the utilization of chemical solvents via absorption". , 43, 3, 2025, 174-191. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.152635.1799
Al-Maaine, H., AlHaboubi, N. (2025). 'An exhaustive review of carbon dioxide capture through the utilization of chemical solvents via absorption', , 43(3), pp. 174-191. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.152635.1799
Al-Maaine, H., AlHaboubi, N. An exhaustive review of carbon dioxide capture through the utilization of chemical solvents via absorption. , 2025; 43(3): 174-191. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.152635.1799

An exhaustive review of carbon dioxide capture through the utilization of chemical solvents via absorption

Engineering and Technology Journal
Volume 43, Issue 3, March 2025, Pages 174-191    PDF (1.43 M)
Document Type: Review Paper
DOI: 10.30684/etj.2024.152635.1799
Authors
Hala H. Al-Maaine* ; Naseer A. AlHaboubi
Chemical Engineering Dept., College of Engineering, University of Alnahrain, Jadriya, Baghdad, Iraq.
Abstract
The release of carbon dioxide from the combustion of fossil fuels and chimney emissions has emerged as the primary catalyst for global warming. The significant increase in emissions is due to various factors, including power plants that rely on fossil fuels, different industrial processes, and many other factors, all of which are the main causes of environmental pollution. The need has arisen to invent an effective way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere, where scientists have reviewed several methods, such as transitioning to renewable energy, improving energy generation stations, and capturing carbon dioxide emissions. However, the optimal and most realistic choice is carbon capture and storage to preserve a green environment. Currently, there are three methods: pre-combustion capture, post-combustion capture, and oxyfuel combustion. Post-combustion capture is the most common system; among its various methods, absorption is considered one of the most common processes for gas capture. Absorption involves contact between a gas-liquid mixture to remove one of the gas components by dissolving it in a suitable liquid. The purpose of this review is to clarify the techniques of CO2 capture with a focus on the absorption process using the absorbent material (NaOH), as well as to identify other types of absorbent materials used in absorption processes and the effect of reactor structure on absorption performance in addition to the impact of reaction parameters on absorption efficiency.

Highlights
  • The latest research on carbon dioxide capture through chemical absorption has been reviewed.
  • This review helps in determining the optimal method for carbon dioxide capture .
  • It discusses the impact of operating factors on the performance of absorption.
  • The performance of absorption is determined by the mass transfer between the absorbent material and carbon dioxide.
Keywords
Chemical absorption; CO2 Capture; Global warming; Solvents; Post-combustion
References
  1. M.N.Anwar, A.Fayyaz , N.F. Sohail , M.F. Khokhar , M. Baqar , W.D. Khan , K. Rasool , M. Rehan , A.S. Nizami,  CO2 capture and storage: A way forward for sustainable environment, J. Environ. Manage., 226 (2018) 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.009
  2. G. Hu, N. J. Nicholas, K. H. Smith, K. A. Mumford, S. E. Kentish, and G. W. Stevens, Carbon dioxide absorption into promoted potassium carbonate solutions: A review, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 53 (2016) 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.07.020
  3. T. F. Wall, Combustion processes for carbon capture, Proc. Combust. Inst., 31 (2007) 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.123
  4. S.-J. Han, M. Yoo, D.-W. Kim, and J.-H. Wee, Carbon dioxide capture using calcium hydroxide aqueous solution as the absorbent, Energy Fuels, 25 (2011) 3825–3834. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef200415p
  5. M. Kheirinik, S. Ahmed, and N. Rahmanian, Comparative techno-economic analysis of carbon capture processes: Pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion operations, Sustainability, 13 (2021) 13567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413567
  6. M. Wang, A. Lawal, P. Stephenson, J. Sidders, and C. Ramshaw, Post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: A state-of-the-art review, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 89 (2011) 1609–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2010.11.005
  7. T. N. G. Borhani, A. Azarpour, V. Akbari, S. R. W. Alwi, and Z. A. Manan, CO2 capture with potassium carbonate solutions: A state-of-the-art review, Int. J. Greenh. gas Control, 41 (2015) 142–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.026
  8. B. A. Oyenekan and G. T. Rochelle, Alternative stripper configurations for CO2 capture by aqueous amines, AIChE J., 53 (2007) 3144–3154.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11316
  9. F. Vega, M. Cano, S. Camino, L. M. G. Fernández, E. Portillo, and B. Navarrete, Solvents for carbon dioxide capture, Carbon dioxide Chem. capture oil Recover., 32 (137–144) 2018. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71443
  10. T. N. Borhani and M. Wang, Role of solvents in CO2 capture processes: The review of selection and design methods, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 114 (2019) 109299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109299
  11. H. Ritchie and M. Roser, Sector by sector: where do global greenhouse gas emissions come from?, Our World data, 2024.
  12. T. Gerlach, Volcanic versus anthropogenic carbon dioxide, Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 92 (2011) 201–202. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011EO240001
  13. P. B. Podder, F. Pattnaik, S. Nanda, and A. Dalai, A review of carbon capture and valorization technologies, Energies, 16 (2023) 2589. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062589
  14. G.-R. Walther, E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T. J. C. Beebee, J.-M. Fromentin, O. Hoegh-Guldberg and F. Bairlein, Ecological responses to recent climate change, Nature, 416 (2002) 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/416389a
  15. K. Azuma, N. Kagi, U. Yanagi, and H. Osawa, Effects of low-level inhalation exposure to carbon dioxide in indoor environments: A short review on human health and psychomotor performance, Environ. Int., 121 (2018) 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.059
  16. P. R. Yaashikaa, A. Saravanan, P. S. Kumar, P. Thamarai, and G. Rangasamy, Role of microbial carbon capture cells in carbon sequestration and energy generation during wastewater treatment: A sustainable solution for cleaner environment, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 52 (2023) 799-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.307
  17. P. Zhou and M. Wang, Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review, Ecol. Econ., 125 (2016) 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.001
  18. B. R. Patra, A. Mukherjee, S. Nanda, and A. K. Dalai, Biochar production, activation and adsorptive applications: a review, Environ. Chem. Lett., 19 (2021) 2237–2259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01165-9
  19. B. R. Patra, S. Nanda, A. K. Dalai, and V. Meda, Taguchi-based process optimization for activation of agro-food waste biochar and performance test for dye adsorption, Chemosphere, 285 (2021) 131531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131531
  20. Y. Jing, A. Rabbani, R. T. Armstrong, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, and P. Mostaghimi, An image-based coal network model for simulating hydro-mechanical gas flow in coal: An application to carbon dioxide geo-sequestration, J. Clean. Prod., 379 (2022) 134647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134647
  21. J. Podder, B. R. Patra, F. Pattnaik, S. Nanda, and A. K. Dalai, A review of carbon capture and valorization technologies, Energies, 16 (2023) 2589. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062589
  22. Z. Chen, A Review of Pre-combustion Carbon Capture Technology, in 2022 7th Int. Conf. on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2022), Atlantis Press, 2022, 524–528, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220405.086
  23. A. G. Olabi, K. Obaideen , K. Elsaid, T. Wilberforce , E. Taha Sayed , H. M. Maghrabie, M. A.  Abdelkareem,  Assessment of the pre-combustion carbon capture contribution into sustainable development goals SDGs using novel indicators, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 153 (2022) 111710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111710
  24. G. Scheffknecht, L. Al-Makhadmeh, U. Schnell and J. Maier, Oxy-fuel coal combustion—A review of the current state-of-the-art, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 5 (2011) S16–S35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.05.020
  25. M. B. Toftegaard, J. Brix, P. A. Jensen, P. Glarborg, and A. D. Jensen, Oxy-fuel combustion of solid fuels, Prog. energy Combust. Sci., 36 (2010) 581–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2010.02.001
  26. P. Madejski, K. Chmiel, N. Subramanian, and T. Kuś, Methods and techniques for CO2 capture: Review of potential solutions and applications in modern energy technologies, Energies, 15, (2022) 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030887
  27. L. Fu, Z. Ren, W. Si, Q. Ma, W. Huang, Research progress on CO2 capture and utilization technology, J. CO2 Util., 66 (2022) 102260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102260
  28. S. Y. W. Chai, L. H. Ngu, and B. S. How, Review of carbon capture absorbents for CO2 utilization, Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol., 12 (2022) 394–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2151
  29. A. S. Ahmed, M. R. Rahman, and M. K. Bin Bakri, A Review Based on Low-and High-Stream Global Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Technology and Implementation Strategy, J. Appl. Sci. Process Eng., 8 (2021) 722–737. https://doi.org/10.33736/jaspe.3157.2021
  30. D. Y. C. Leung, G. Caramanna, and M. M. Maroto-Valer, An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies, Renew. Sustain. energy Rev., 39 (2014) 426–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093
  31. S. H. Han, Y. S. Lee, J. R. Cho, and K. H. Lee, Efficiency analysis of air-fuel and oxy-fuel combustion in a reheating furnace, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 121 (2018) 1364–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.12.110
  32. S. García-Luna, C. Ortiz, A. Carro, R. Chacartegui, and L. A. Pérez-Maqueda, Oxygen production routes assessment for oxy-fuel combustion, Energy, 254 (2022) 124303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124303
  33. F. Raganati and P. Ammendola, CO2 Post-combustion Capture: A Critical Review of Current Technologies and Future Directions, Energy Fuels, 38 (2024) 13858–13905 . https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02513
  34. Naucler, T., Campbell, W. and Ruijs. J., Carbon capture and storage: assessing the economics, 2008.
  35. R. T. J. Porter, M. Fairweather, C. Kolster, N. Mac Dowell, N. Shah, and R. M. Woolley, Cost and performance of some carbon capture technology options for producing different quality CO2 product streams, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 57 (2017) 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.11.020
  36. G. Manzolini, J. W. Dijkstra, E. Macchi, and D. Jansen, Technical economic evaluation of a system for electricity production with CO2 capture using a membrane reformer with permeate side combustion, in Proce. Ser. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, (2006) 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2006-90353
  37. F. Gautier, F. Châtel-Pélage, R. K. Varagani, P. Pranda, D. McDonald,  D. Devault, H. Farzan,  R. L. Schoff,  J. Ciferno  A. C. Bose., Oxy-Combustion Process for CO2 Capture from Coal-Fired Power Plants: Engineering Case Studies and Engineering Feasibility Analysis, in Proc. 5th Ann. Conf. Carbon Capture and Sequestration, Alexandria, VA, USA, 2006, 8–11.
  38. Torgeir M.,2005, Chap. 3 - Economic and cost analysis for CO2 capture costs in the CO2 capture project scenarios, Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations, from CO2 Capture Project scenarios, 47 – 87.
  39. D. Karali, K. Peloriadi, N. Margaritis, and P. Grammelis, CO2 Absorption Using Potassium Carbonate as Solvent, Eng. Proc., 31 (2022) 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13824
  40. A. Kothandaraman, Carbon dioxide capture by chemical absorption: a solvent comparison study, Thes. Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, 2010.
  41. S. Vaz Jr, A. P. R. de Souza, and B. E. L. Baeta, Technologies for carbon dioxide capture: A review applied to energy sectors, Clean. Eng. Technol., 8 (2022) 100456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100456
  42. S. Yadav and S. S. Mondal, A complete review based on various aspects of pulverized coal combustion, Int. J. Energy Res., 43 (2019) 3134–3165. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4395
  43. U. Khan, C. C. Ogbaga, O.-A. O. Abiodun, A. A. Adeleke, P. P. Ikubanni,  P. U. Okoye, J. A. Okolie h,  Assessing absorption-based CO2 capture: Research progress and techno-economic assessment overview, Carbon Capture Sci. Technol., 8 (2023) 100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2023.100125
  44. R. Robiah, U. Renaldi, and A. Melani, Kajian pengaruh laju alir NaOH dan waktu kontak terhadap absorpsi gas CO2 menggunakan alat absorber tipe sieve tray, J. Distilasi, 6 (2021) 27–35.
  45. U. Arachchige, N. Aryal, and M. C. Melaaen, Case study for flue gas separation of a coal fired power plant and parameters’ effect on removal efficiency, Conf. Proc. 6th Asia Pacific Chemical Reaction Eng. Symp., (APCRE’11)At: China, 11, 2011.
  46. C. Chao, Y. Deng, R. Dewil, J. Baeyens, and X. Fan, Post-combustion carbon capture, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.,138 (2021) 110490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110490
  47. A. Nugroho, Y. B. Susanto, V. L. Kamilah, and R. Prameswari, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Absorption Process Using Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH), IPTEK J. Eng., 9 (2023) 30–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23378557.v9i1.a15192
  48. S. S. Sayar, T. J. Mohammed, and A. M. A. Karim, Carbon Dioxide Absorption By 1-Butyl-3-Methyl-Imidazolium Tetraflouroborate [Bmim][BF4], Iraqi J. Oil Gas Res., 2 (2022) 1–12. https://doi.org/10.55699/ijogr.2022.0202.1021
  49. Cambier N., Carbon dioxide capture using sodium hydroxide solution: comparison between an absorption column and a membrane contactor, Msc. Thes., Ec. Polytech. Louvain, Univ. Cathol. Louvain, Prom, Luis Alconero, Patricia, 2017.
  50. M. Afkhamipour and M. Mofarahi, Review on the mass transfer performance of CO2 absorption by amine-based solvents in low-and high-pressure absorption packed columns, RSC Adv., 7 (2017) 17857–17872. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA01352C
  51. Puxty, G., Maeder, M. and Bennett, R., Reactive Chemical Absorption of CO2 by Organic Molecules, in Sustainable Carbon Capture, CRC Press, 2022, 29–71.http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003162780-2
  52. H. Yousefzadeh, C. Güler, C. Erkey, and E. Uzunlar, CO2 absorption into primary and secondary amine aqueous solutions with and without copper ions in a bubble column, Turkish J. Chem., 46 (2022) 999–1010. http://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0527.3410
  53. F. M. Khan, V. Krishnamoorthi, and T. Mahmud, Modelling reactive absorption of CO2 in packed columns for post-combustion carbon capture applications, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 89 (2011) 1600–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2010.09.020
  54. B. Huang, Research progress of CO2 separation technology by solvent absorption, in E3S Web of Conferences, International Symposium on Energy Science and Chemical Engineering (ISESCE 2023), EDP Sci., 385 (2023) 04032. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338504032
  55. Y. Peng, B. Zhao, and L. Li, Advance in post-combustion CO2 capture with alkaline solution: a brief review, Energy Procedia, 14 (2012) 1515–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.1126
  56. L. I. N. Haizhou, Y. Hui, L. U. O. Haizhong, P. E. I. Aiguo, and F. Mengxiang, Research progress on amine absorbent for CO2 capture from flue gas, South. Energy Construct., 6 (2019) 16–21. https://doi.org/10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2019.01.003
  57. C. Zhang, Absorption principle and techno-economic analysis of CO2 absorption technologies: A review, in IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2021, 12045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/657/1/012045
  58. M. Aghaie, N. Rezaei, and S. Zendehboudi, A systematic review on CO2 capture with ionic liquids: Current status and future prospects, Renew. Sustain. energy Rev., 96 (2018) 502–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.004
  59. Y. Wu, J. Xu, K. Mumford, G. W. Stevens, W. Fei, and Y. Wang, Recent advances in carbon dioxide capture and utilization with amines and ionic liquids, Green Chem. Eng., 1 (2020) 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gce.2020.09.005
  60. N. Harun, T. Nittaya, P. L. Douglas, E. Croiset, and L. A. Ricardez-Sandoval, Dynamic simulation of MEA absorption process for CO2 capture from power plants, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 10 (2012) 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.017
  61. Bandyopadhyay, A., Carbon capture and storage: CO2 management technologies, CRC Press, 2014.
  62. J.-L. Kang, K.-T. Liu, D. S.-H. Wong, S.-S. Jang, and D.-H. Tsai, Multi-Scale Modeling and Study of Aerosol Growth in an Amine-based CO2 Capture Absorber, Environments, 7 (2020) 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments7080058
  63. Z. (Henry) Liang, W. Rongwong, H. Liu, K. Fu, H. Gao, et al., Recent progress and new developments in post-combustion carbon-capture technology with amine based solvents, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 40 (2015) 26–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.017
  64. N. A. H. Hairul, A. M. Shariff and M. A. Bustam, Mass transfer performance of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol and piperazine promoted 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol blended solvent in high pressure CO2 absorption, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 49 (2016) 121–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.02.030
  65. S. Moioli and L. A. Pellegrini, Describing physical properties of CO2 unloaded and loaded MDEA+ PZ solutions, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 138 (2028) 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.08.018
  66. C. Nwaoha, C. Saiwan, T. Supap , R. Idem, P. Tontiwachwuthikul, W. Rongwong, M. J. Al-Marri, A.  Benamor, Carbon dioxide (CO2) capture performance of aqueous tri-solvent blends containing 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) promoted by diethylenetriamine (DETA), Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 53 (2016) 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.08.012
  67. A. Haghtalab and A. Izadi, Simultaneous measurement solubility of carbon dioxide+ hydrogen sulfide into aqueous blends of alkanolamines at high pressure, Fluid Phase Equilib., 375 (2014) 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2014.05.017
  68. R. Zhang, X. Luo, Q. Yang, H. Yu, G. Puxty, and Z. Liang, Analysis for the speciation in CO2 loaded aqueous MEDA and MAPA solution using 13C NMR technology, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 71 (2018) 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.02.001
  69. Z. L. Ooi, P. Y. Tan, L. S. Tan, and S. P. Yeap, Amine-based solvent for CO2 absorption and its impact on carbon steel corrosion: A perspective review, Chinese J. Chem. Eng., 28 (2020) 1357–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2020.02.029
  70. F. Meng, Y. Meng, T. Ju, S. Han, L. Lin, and J. Jiang, Research progress of aqueous amine solution for CO2 capture: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 168 (2022) 112902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112902
  71. P. Stepnowski, A. Müller, P. Behrend, J. Ranke, J. Hoffmann, and B. Jastorff, Reversed-phase liquid chromatographic method for the determination of selected room-temperature ionic liquid cations, J. Chromatogr. A, 993 (2003) 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(03)00322-4
  72. J.-M. Lévêque, S. Desset, J. Suptil, C. Fachinger, M. Draye, W. Bonrath, G. Cravottoa, general ultrasound-assisted access to room-temperature ionic liquids, Ultrason. Sonochem., 13 (2006) 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2005.09.001
  73. J. Gao, L. Cao, H. Dong, X. Zhang, and S. Zhang, Ionic liquids tailored amine aqueous solution for pre-combustion CO2 capture: Role of imidazolium-based ionic liquids, Appl. Energy, 154 (2015) 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.073
  74. Liu, H., Idem, R., and Tontiwachwuthikul, P., Post-combustion CO2 capture technology: by using the amine based solvents. Springer, 2019.
  75. R. Yusoff, M. K. Aroua, A. Shamiri, A. Ahmady, N. S. Jusoh, N. F. Asmuni, L. C. Bong, S. H. Thee, Density and viscosity of aqueous mixtures of N-methyldiethanolamines (MDEA) and ionic liquids, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 58 (2013) 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1021/je300628e
  76. J.-M. Commenge, T. Obein, X. Framboisier, S. Rode, P. Pitiot and M. Matlosz, Gas-phase mass-transfer measurements in a falling-film microreactor, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66 (2011) 1212–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.12.025
  77. R. E. Tsai, A. F. Seibert, R. B. Eldridge, and G. T. Rochelle, A dimensionless model for predicting the mass‐transfer area of structured packing, AIChE J., 57 (2011) 1173–1184. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.12345
  78. M. Yoo, S.-J. Han, and J.-H. Wee, Carbon dioxide capture capacity of sodium hydroxide aqueous solution, J. Environ. Manage., 114 (2013) 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.061
  79. Y. Nie, Y. Li, H. Wang, D. Guo, L. Liu, and Y. Fu, Metal oxides enhance the absorption performance of N-methyldiethanolamine solution during the carbon dioxide capture process, ACS Omega, 8 (2023) 11813–11823. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06482
  80. Q. Zeng, Y. Guo, Z. Niu, and W. Lin, The absorption rate of CO2 by aqueous ammonia in a packed column, Fuel Process. Technol., 108 (2013) 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.05.005
  81. B. Aghel, E. Heidaryan, S. Sahraie, and M. Nazari, Optimization of monoethanolamine for CO2 absorption in a microchannel reactor, J. CO2 Util., 28 (2018) 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.10.005
  82. F. Azizi, L. Kaady, and M. Al‐Hindi, Chemical absorption of CO2 in alkaline solutions using an intensified reactor, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 100 (2022) 2172–2190.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.24420
  83. T. Pichler, B. Stoppacher, A. Kaufmann, M. Siebenhofer, and M. Kienberger, Continuous Neutralization of NaOH Solution with CO2 in an Internal‐Loop Airlift Reactor, Chem. Eng. Technol., 44 (2021) 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202000319
  84. I. R. Salmón, N. Cambier, and P. Luis, CO2 capture by alkaline solution for carbonate production: a comparison between a packed column and a membrane contactor, Appl. Sci., 8 (2018) 996.  https://doi.org/10.3390/app8060996
  85. Y. Wang , Y. Dong , L. Zhang,  G. Chu,  H. Zou, B. Sun , X. Zeng,Carbon dioxide capture by non-aqueous blend in rotating packed bed reactor: Absorption and desorption investigation, Sep. Purif. Technol., 269 (2021) 118714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118714
  86. G. U. L. Ayse and Ü. T. ÜN, Carbon Dioxide Absorption Using Different Solvents (MEA, NaOH, KOH and Mg (OH)2 in Bubble Column Reactor, Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilim. Derg., 12 (2023) 418–427. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1230356
  87. S. Kazemi, A. Ghaemi, and K. Tahvildari, Chemical absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous piperazine solutions using a stirred reactor, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng., 39 (2020) 253–267. https://doi.org/10.30492/ijcce.2019.35175
  88. H. Liao, H. Gao, B. Xu, and Z. Liang, Mass transfer performance studies of aqueous blended DEEA-MEA solution using orthogonal array design in a packed column, Sep. Purif. Technol., 183 (2017) 117–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.03.064
  89. D. Ma, C. Zhu, T. Fu, Y. Ma, and X. Yuan, Synergistic effect of functionalized ionic liquid and alkanolamines mixed solution on enhancing the mass transfer of CO2 absorption in microchannel, Chem. Eng. J., 417 (2021) 129302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129302
  90. B. Žalys, K. Venslauskas, K. Navickas, E. Buivydas, and M. Rubežius, The influence of CO2 injection into manure as a pretreatment method for increased biogas production, Sustainability, 15 (2023) 3670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043670
  91. S. Janati, B. Aghel, and M. S. Shadloo, The effect of alkanolamine mixtures on CO2 absorption efficiency in T-Shaped microchannel, Environ. Technol. Innov., 24 (2021) 102006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.102006
  92. C.-H. Yu, C.-H. Huang, and C.-S. Tan, A review of CO2 capture by absorption and adsorption, Aerosol air Qual. Res., 125 (2021) 745–769. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132
  93. B. Xu, H. Gao, X. Luo, H. Liao, and Z. Liang, Mass transfer performance of CO2 absorption into aqueous DEEA in packed columns, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 51 (2016) 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.05.004
  94. H. Cheng, Y. Fan, D. Tarlet, L. Luo, and Z. Fan, Microfluidic-based chemical absorption technology for CO2 capture: Mass transfer dynamics, operating factors and performance intensification, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 181 (2023) 113357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113357
  95. K. Fu, W. Rongwong, Z. Liang, Y. Na, R. Idem, and P. Tontiwachwuthikul, Experimental analyses of mass transfer and heat transfer of post-combustion CO2 absorption using hybrid solvent MEA–MeOH in an absorber, Chem. Eng. J., 260 (2015) 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.064
  96. A. Altway, S. Susianto, S. Suprapto, S. Nurkhamidah, N. I. F. Nisa, F. Hardiyanto, H. R. Mulya, S. Altway, Modeling and simulation of CO2 absorption into promoted aqueous potassium carbonate solution in industrial scale packed column, Bull. Chem. React. Eng. Catal., 10 (2015) 111–124. https://doi.org/10.9767/bcrec.10.2.7063.111-124
  97. Z. Qing, G. Yincheng, and N. Zhenqi, Experimental studies on removal capacity of carbon dioxide by a packed reactor and a spray column using aqueous ammonia, Energy Procedia, 4 (2011) 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.083
  98. K. H. Javed, T. Mahmud, and E. Purba, The CO2 capture performance of a high-intensity vortex spray scrubber, Chem. Eng. J., 162 (2010) 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.03.038
  99. H. Ling, S. Liu, H. Gao, H. Zhang, and Z. Liang, Solubility of N2O, equilibrium solubility, mass transfer study and modeling of CO2 absorption into aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA)/1-dimethylamino-2-propanol (1DMA2P) solution for post-combustion CO2 capture, Sep. Purif. Technol., 232 (2020) 115957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115957
  100. B. Zhao, Y. Su, and Y. Peng, Effect of reactor geometry on aqueous ammonia-based carbon dioxide capture in bubble column reactors, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 17 (2013) 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.06.009
  101. B. Aghel, E. Heidaryan, S. Sahraie, and S. Mir, Application of the microchannel reactor to carbon dioxide absorption, J. Clean. Prod., 231 (2019) 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.265
  102. A. Gul and U. T. Un, Effect of temperature and gas flow rate on CO2 capture, Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. Res., 6 (2022) em0181. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/11727
  103. L. S. Tan, A. M. Shariff, K. K. Lau, and M. A. Bustam, Factors affecting CO2 absorption efficiency in packed column: A review, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 18 (2012) 1874–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.05.013
  104. J. Monde, T. Widjaja, and A. Altway, Effect of Promoter Concentration on CO2 Separation Using K2CO3 With Reactive Absorption Method in Reactor Packed Column, in MATEC Web of Conf., EDP Sci., 2018, 2002.
    https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815602002
  105. B. Zhao, Y. Su, W. Tao, L. Li, and Y. Peng, Post-combustion CO2 capture by aqueous ammonia: A state-of-the-art review, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 9 (2012) 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.05.006
  106. N. F. A. Mustafa, A. M. Shariff, W. Tay, and S. M. M. Yusof, Effect of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) concentration in the gas feed on Carbon Dioxide Absorption Performance using Aqueous Potassium Carbonate promoted with Glycine, in E3S Web of Conf., EDP Sci., 2021, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128702007
  107. V. Rajiman, N. A. H. Hairul, and A. M. Shariff, Effect of CO2 concentration and liquid to gas ratio on CO2 absorption from simulated biogas using monoethanolamine solution, in IOP Conf. Ser.: Mat. Sci. Eng., IOP Publishing, 2020, 12133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/991/1/012133
  108. X. Wu, Y. Yu, Z. Qin, and Z. Zhang, Performance of CO2 absorption in a diameter-varying spray tower, Chinese J. Chem. Eng., 25 (2017) 1109–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2017.03.013
  109. K. Fu, T. Sema, Z. Liang, H. Liu, Y. Na, H. Shi, R. Idem, P. Tontiwachwuthikul, Investigation of mass-transfer performance for CO2 absorption into diethylenetriamine (DETA) in a randomly packed column, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51 (2012) 12058–12064. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie300830h
  110. A. Gul, M. Derakhshandeh, and U. T. Un, Optimization of carbon dioxide absorption in a continuous bubble column reactor using response surface methodology, Environ. Qual. Manag., 33 (2023) 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.22020
  111. H. N. Abdul Halim, A. M. Shariff, L. S. Tan, and M. A. Bustam, Mass transfer performance of CO2 absorption from natural gas using monoethanolamine (MEA) in high pressure operations, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 54 (2015) 1675–1680. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie504024m
  112. A. A. Khan, G. N. Halder, and A. K. Saha, Experimental investigation on efficient carbon dioxide capture using piperazine (PZ) activated aqueous methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) solution in a packed column, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 64 (2017) 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.07.016
Statistics
Article View: 596
PDF Download: 326


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com