COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMA SCORING SYSTEM (BATSS) AND CECT ABDOMEN TO DETECT BLUNT TRAUMA ABDOMEN IN ADULT PATIENTS

E., Manjush; Kumar R, Sathish

doi:10.33762/bsurg.2024.153210.1090

	COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMA SCORING SYSTEM (BATSS) AND CECT ABDOMEN TO DETECT BLUNT TRAUMA ABDOMEN IN ADULT PATIENTS
Basrah Journal of Surgery
Article 5, Volume 30, Issue 2 - Serial Number 60, December 2024, Pages 35-43 PDF (287.68 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.33762/bsurg.2024.153210.1090
Authors
Manjush E.^* ¹; Sathish Kumar R²
¹Professor, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, India
²Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, India.
Abstract
Background: Blunt abdominal trauma is the third most common cause of death resulting from trauma. The Blunt Trauma Scoring System (BATSS) was developed to diagnose intra-abdominal injuries and identify a select subset of patients for further investigations. This scoring system simplifies triage, reduces unnecessary computed tomography (CT) scans, minimizes radiation exposure, and lowers the costs associated with diagnosis and treatment. Aim: To compare BATSS with Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) of the abdomen in diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma among adults. Patients and Methods: This descriptive study was conducted on a population of 155 adult patients who presented to the general surgery casualty at Government Medical College, Kozhikode. Results: Among the 155 patients, 89.7% were male. The BATSS and CECT identified intra-abdominal injuries in 90.3% (n=140) of the cases. Notably, all patients with intra-abdominal injury had a BATSS score greater than 8. The sensitivity and specificity of BATSS in diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma were found to be 100% and 97.3% respectively, with an optimal cutoff ROC curve value of 8.5. A BATSS score greater than 8 strongly predicts the presence of intra-abdominal injury. Conclusion: BATSS, which incorporates clinical manifestations, pelvic fractures, and Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST), is a highly precise and reliable diagnostic tool for detecting blunt abdominal trauma. It has the potential to reduce unnecessary CT scans and associated costs.
Keywords
Blunt trauma abdomen; Blunt trauma scoring system; Laparotomy

References
1. Miniño AM, Heron MP, Murphy SL, Kochanek KD. Deaths: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007 Aug 21;55(19):1-119. 2. Chardoli M, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Analysis of trauma outcome at a university hospital in Zahedan, Iran using the TRISS method. East Afr Med J. 2006 Aug;83(8):440-2. https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v83i8.9458 3. Kendall JL, Kestler AM, Whitaker KT, Adkisson MM, Haukoos JS. Blunt abdominal trauma patients are at very low risk for intra-abdominal injury after emergency department observation. West J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;12(4):496-504. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2010.11.2016 4. Rodriguez A, DuPriest RWJ, Shatney CH. Recognition of intra-abdominal injury in blunt trauma victims. A prospective study comparing physical examination with peritoneal lavage. Am Surg. 1982 Sep;48(9):457-9. 5. Schurink GW, Bode PJ, van Luijt PA, van Vugt AB. The value of physical examination in the diagnosis of patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a retrospective study. Injury. 1997 May;28(4):261-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(97)00007-7 6. Michalke JA. An overview of emergency ultrasound in the United States. World J Emerg Med. 2012;3(2):85-90. https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2012.02.001 7. Poletti PA, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Takada T, Killeen KL, Perlmutter D, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma patients: an organ injury be excluded without performing computed tomography? J Trauma. 2004 Nov;57(5):1072-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000092680.73274.E1 8. Fabian TC, Mangiante EC, White TJ, Patterson CR, Boldreghini S, Britt LG. A prospective study of 91 patients undergoing both computed tomography and peritoneal lavage following blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 1986 Jul;26(7):602-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198607000-00003 9. Federle MP, Crass RA, Jeffrey RB, Trunkey DD. Computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma. Arch Surg. 1982 May;117(5):645-50. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380290091016 10. Meyer DM, Thal ER, Weigelt JA, Redman HC. Evaluation of computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 1989 Aug;29(8):1168-70; discussion 1170-1172. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198908000-00017 11. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology. 2004 Sep;232(3):735-8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2323031095 12. Majid S, Gholamreza F, Mahmoud Y, Mehdi Y, Ali AD, Anita S, Ali M. New scoring system for intra-abdominal injury diagnosis after blunt trauma. Chinese journal of traumatology. 2014 Feb 1;17(01):19-24. 13. Nishijima DK, Simel DL, Wisner DH, Holmes JF. Does this adult patient have a blunt intra-abdominal injury? JAMA. 2012;307(14):1517-27. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.422 14. Shojaee M, Faridaalaee G, Yousefifard M, Yaseri M, Arhami Dolatabadi A, Sabzghabaei A, et al. New scoring system for intra-abdominal injury diagnosis after blunt trauma. Chin J Traumatol. 2014;17(1):19-24. 15. Afifi RY. Blunt abdominal trauma: back to clinical judgment in the era of modern technology. Int J Surg. 2008 Apr;6(2):91-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.09.005 16. Cotton BA, Beckert BW, Smith MK, Burd RS. The utility of clinical and laboratory data for predicting intraabdominal injury among children. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2004 May 1;56(5):1068-75. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000082153.38386.20
Statistics Article View: 893 PDF Download: 415