Mahmmod, L., Abbas, W. (2025). Sustainable and cost-effective cement-based composite utilizing calcined Iraqi date palm frond waste ash. , 43(5), 386-400. doi: 10.30684/etj.2025.156722.1883
Laith M. R. Mahmmod; Waleed A. Abbas. "Sustainable and cost-effective cement-based composite utilizing calcined Iraqi date palm frond waste ash". , 43, 5, 2025, 386-400. doi: 10.30684/etj.2025.156722.1883
Mahmmod, L., Abbas, W. (2025). 'Sustainable and cost-effective cement-based composite utilizing calcined Iraqi date palm frond waste ash', , 43(5), pp. 386-400. doi: 10.30684/etj.2025.156722.1883
Mahmmod, L., Abbas, W. Sustainable and cost-effective cement-based composite utilizing calcined Iraqi date palm frond waste ash. , 2025; 43(5): 386-400. doi: 10.30684/etj.2025.156722.1883

Sustainable and cost-effective cement-based composite utilizing calcined Iraqi date palm frond waste ash

Engineering and Technology Journal
Volume 43, Issue 5, May 2025, Pages 386-400    PDF (2.14 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30684/etj.2025.156722.1883
Authors
Laith M. R. Mahmmod* 1; Waleed A. Abbas2
1Civil Engineering Dept., College of Engineering, University of Kerbala, 56001 Karbala, Iraq. Civil Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsinaa street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.
2Civil Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsinaa street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.
Abstract
Ecological implications posed by the cement industry, biomass ashes, and agricultural waste are growing with emerging concerns. Hence, this paper analyzes and evaluates the characterization of Iraqi date palm frond waste ash (PFWA) and its potential impact on the performance of cement-based mortar. PFWA was utilized to substitute 10, 20, and 30% of the partial weight of cement. The experimental program consists of three main parts: Firstly, the preliminary physicochemical and microanalysis characterization of PFWA powder was investigated and corresponded with the limits of ASTMC-618. Secondly, the compressive and flexural strength, dry density, and water absorption capacity of the fabricated cement-based mortar with the adopted replacement percentages were observed. Finally, the cost analysis of the final products was conducted to obtain a cost-effective evaluation. Generally, the results proved that incorporating 10% PFWA boosts the hardened characteristics. Alternatively, further upgrading of the PFWA content adversely affects the investigated properties. After 28 and 90 days, 10% PFWA boosted the compressive strength by around 15% compared with the control mixture. The cost analysis proves a reduction in the total cost of the mortar by 8.1, 16.1, and 24.1% by replacing 10%, 20%, and 30% of OPC with PFWA. Therefore, using PFWA as SCM in cement-based composites could be a promoted alternative that would benefit the management, recycling, and reusing rate of agricultural waste and support the advancement of sustainability through the construction sector with cost-effective advantages.

Highlights
  • Iraqi palm frond waste ash used as a supplementary cementations material (SCM)
  • PFWA showed pozzolanic and cementitious properties due to its elemental composition
  • A 10% PFWA replacement improved the properties of cement-based mortar
  • Caution is advised when increasing PFWA content in cement-based composites
Keywords
Palm frond waste ash Cost; effective mortar Sustainable binders Microanalysis Supplementary cementitious materials
References
  1. A. Al-Hamrani, M. Kucukvar, W. Alnahhal, E. Mahdi, and N. C. Onat, Green concrete for a circular economy: A review on sustainability, durability, and structural properties, Materials, 14 (2021) 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020351.
  2. S. Ni, H. Liu, Q. Li, H. Quan, M. Gheibi, A. M. Fathollahi-Fard, and G. Tian, Assessment of the engineering properties, carbon dioxide emission and economic of biomass recycled aggregate concrete: A novel approach for building green concretes, J. Clean. Prod., 365 (2022) 132780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132780.
  3. E. Gartner, Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements, Cem. Concr. Res., 34 (2004) 1489-1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021.
  4. Li, Z., Zhou, X., Ma, H. and Hou, D., Advanced concrete technology, United State John Wiley & Sons, 624, 2022.
  5. H. Mikulčić, J. J. Klemeš, M. Vujanović, K. Urbaniec, and N. Duić, Reducing greenhouse gasses emissions by fostering the deployment of alternative raw materials and energy sources in the cleaner cement manufacturing process, J. Clean. Prod., 136 (2016) 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.145.
  6. O. E. Ige, D. V. Von Kallon, and D. Desai, Carbon emissions mitigation methods for cement industry using a systems dynamics model, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 26 (2024) 579-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02683-0.
  7. W. Ahmad, A. Ahmad, K. Ostrowski, F. Aslam and P. Joyklad, A scientometric review of waste material utilization in concrete for sustainable construction, Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 15 (2021) e00683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00683.
  8. M. S. Imbabi, C. Carrigan, and S. McKenna, Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology, Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ., 1 (2012) 194-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2013.05.001.
  9. M. M. Hason, A. O. Al-Sulttani, I. S. Abbood, and A. N. Hanoon, Emissions investigating of carbon dioxide generated by the iraqi cement industry, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 928 (2020) 022041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/928/2/022041.
  10. S. M. Atia and W.A. Abbas, Effect of starch powder on behavior of silica fume biopolymer concrete, Eng.Technol. J., 39 (2021) 1797-1805. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.v39i12.2103.
  11. Z. M. Abed, H. K. Ahmed and W.I. Khalil, Optimization of silica fume and slag in roller compacted concrete by taguchi method, Eng. Technol. J., 41 (2023) 724-733. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.2023.138600.1411.
  12. A. A. Ali, T. S. Al-Attar and W. A. Abbas, Mechanical performance of blended fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with GGBS and metakaolin, Eng. Technol. J., 40 (2022) 819-831. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.2022.132647.1135.
  13. M. A. Al hifadhi, T. S. Al-Attar and Q. A. Hasan, A Proposed new mix proportioning method for fly ash-based geopolymer concrete, Eng. Technol. J., 41 (2023) 1346-1354. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.2023.139354.1427.
  14. H. A. Ibrahim and W. A. Abbas, Synergistic effects of composite expired cement fly ash cold-bonding aggregates and mineral admixtures on the mechanical and drying shrinkage performance of sustainable self-compacted concrete, Int. J. Eng., 37 (2024) 2276-2287. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2024.37.11b.13.
  15. M. U. Hossain, R. Cai, S. T. Ng, D. Xuan, and H. Ye, Sustainable natural pozzolana concrete–A comparative study on its environmental performance against concretes with other industrial by-products, Constr. Build. Mater., 270 (2021) 121429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121429.
  16. S. C. Paul, P. B. K. Mbewe, S. Y. Kong, and B. Šavija, Agricultural solid waste as source of supplementary cementitious materials in developing countries, Materials, 12 (2019) 1112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12071112.
  17. S. Blesson and A. U. Rao, Agro-industrial-based wastes as supplementary cementitious or alkali-activated binder material: a comprehensive review, Innov. Infrastruct. Solut., 8 (2023) 125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01096-8.
  18. B. S. Thomas, J. Yang, K. H. Mo, J. A. Abdalla, R. A. Hawileh, and E. Ariyachandra, Biomass ashes from agricultural wastes as supplementary cementitious materials or aggregate replacement in cement/geopolymer concrete: A comprehensive review, J. Build. Eng., 40 (2021) 102332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102332.
  19. N. Ganasen, A. Bahrami, and K. Loganathan, A scientometric analysis review on agricultural wastes used as building materials, Buildings, 13 (2023) 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020426.
  20. M. Nasir, W. Al-Kutti, T. S. Kayed, A. Adesina, and T. Chernykh, Synthesis and SWOT analysis of date palm frond ash–Portland cement composites, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28 (2021) 45240-45252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13957-9.
  21. N. I. Blaisi, Environmental assessment of utilizing date palm ash as partial replacement of cement in mortar, J. Hazard. Mater., 357 (2018) 175-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.013.
  22. W. Al-Kutti, M. Nasir, M. A. M. Johari, A. S. Islam, A. A. Manda, and N. I. Blaisi, An overview and experimental study on hybrid binders containing date palm ash, fly ash, OPC and activator composites, Constr. Build. Mater., 159 (2018) 567-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.017.
  23. F. Alrshoudi and M. Alshannag, Suitability of palm frond waste ash as a supplementary cementitious material, Arabian J. Sci. Eng., 45 (2020) 7967-7974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04502-w.
  24. ASTM-C618, Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete, in the american society for testing and materials, west conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United states of America, 2022.
  25. Siddique, R. and M. I. Khan, Study on the expansion of a cement-based system containing sap polymer and supplementary cementing materials, Supplementary cementing materials, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17866-5
  26. M. Yousefi, R. Khandestani, and N. Gharaei-Moghaddam, Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams made of normal and polypropylene fiber-reinforced concrete containing date palm leaf ash, Structures, 37 (2022) 1053-1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.067.
  27. W. Al-Kutti, A. B. M. Saiful Islam and M. Nasir, Potential use of date palm ash in cement-based materials, J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci., 31 (2019) 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2017.01.004.
  28. M. Nasir and W. Al-Kutti, Performance of date palm ash as a cementitious material by evaluating strength, durability, and characterization, Buildings, 9 (2018) 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9010006.
  29. M. Yousefi, R. Khandestani, and N. Gharaei-Moghaddam, Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams made of normal and polypropylene fiber-reinforced concrete containing date palm leaf ash, Structures, 37 (2022) 1053-1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.067.
  30. IQS-No.5, Portland cement, Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control: Iraq-Baghdad, 2019.
  31. M. Amin, A. M. Zeyad, B. A. Tayeh, and I. S. Agwa, Effects of nano cotton stalk and palm leaf ashes on ultrahigh-performance concrete properties incorporating recycled concrete aggregates, Constr. Build. Mater., 302 (2021) 124196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124196.
  32. M. Adamu, H. Alanazi, Y. E. Ibrahim, and M. Abdellatief, Mechanical, microstructural characteristics and sustainability analysis of concrete incorporating date palm ash and eggshell powder as ternary blends cementitious materials, Constr. Build. Mater., 411 (2024) 134753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134753.
  33. N. Samat, U. Jaman, S. Saree, D. Mahmod, and J. Lai, Characteristics of calcined palm oil pastes for biosilica extraction as a function of calcination temperatures, J. Appl. Res. Technol., 19 (2021) 23-34. https://doi.org/10.14482/INDES.30.1.303.661.
  34. R. Torres-Ortega, D. Torres-Sánchez, and M. Saba, Impact of physical processes and temperatures on the composition, microstructure, and pozzolanic properties of oil palm kernel ash, Chem Engineering, 8 (2024) 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering8060122.
  35. IQS-No.2080, Methods of testing cement-Standard sand for cement mortar cubes, Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control: Iraq-Baghdad, 2018.
  36. ASTM-C311, Standard test methods for sampling and testing fly ash or natural pozzolans for use in portland-cement concrete, in the american society for testing and materials, ASTM-C311/C311M: West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United states of America, 2011.
  37. A.T. Azeez, M.S. Hassan, and A.A.H. Attiyah, Modelling the complementary role of inert slag aggregate and waste glass on concrete mechanical strengths using the response surface and design-of-experiment approach, Constr. Build. Mater, 409 (2023) 134199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134199.
  38. A. Kassu, K. Powers, W. Petway, and A. Sharma, Fourier transform infrared characterization of construction joint sealants, J. Civ. Eng. Mater. Appl., 4 (2020) 155-160. https://doi.org/10.22034/jcema.2020.237399.1029.
  39. G. Georgopoulos, E. Badogiannis, S. Tsivilis, and M. Perraki, Thermally and mechanically treated Greek palygorskite clay as a pozzolanic material, Appl. Clay Sci., 215 (2021) 106306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2021.106306.
  40. ASTM-C109, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50 mm] Cube Specimens, in The American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM C109/C109M: West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United states of America, 2021.
  41. ASTM-C348, Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars, in The American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United states of America, 2021.
  42. ASTM-C642, Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete, in The American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM C642: West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United states of America, 2021.
  43. V. C. Venkateswarlu Chintala, S. K. Suresh Kumar, J. Pandey, A. Sharma, and S. K. Sagar Kumar, Solar thermal pyrolysis of non-edible seeds to biofuels and their feasibility assessment, Energy Convers. Manage., 153 (2017) 482-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.10.029.
  44. R. K. Sharma, J. B. Wooten, V. L. Baliga, X. Lin, W. G. Chan, and M. R. Hajaligol, Characterization of chars from pyrolysis of lignin, Fuel, 83 (2004) 1469-1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2003.11.015.
  45. S. A. El-Sayed, T. M. Khass, and M. E. Mostafa, Thermal degradation behaviour and chemical kinetic characteristics of biomass pyrolysis using TG/DTG/DTA techniques, Biomass Convers, Biorefin., 14 (2024) 17779-17803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03926-2.
  46. M. Abdullah, M. Al-Timimi, W. Albanda, M. Dumitru, A. Balan, C. Ceaus, and I. Stamatin, Structural and electrochemical properties of P3-Na0. 67Mn0. 3Co0. 7O2 nanostructures prepared by citric-urea self-combustion route as cathode for sodium ion battery, Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct., 14 (2019) 1179-1193.
  47. J. Baeza and J. Freer, Chemical characterization of wood and its components, Wood and cellulosic chemistry, 2 (2000) 275-384.
  48. B. Tjeerdsma, B. and H. Militz, Chemical changes in hydrothermal treated wood: FTIR analysis of combined hydrothermal and dry heat-treated wood, Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., 63 (2005) 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-004-0532-8.
  49. W. Al-Kutti, A. S. Islam, and M. Nasir, Potential use of date palm ash in cement-based materials, J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci., 31 (2019) 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2017.01.004.
  50. Adamu, M., Y. E. Ibrahim, and H. Alanazi, Optimization of sustainable concrete properties modified with blends of date palm ash and eggshell powder using response surface methodology, Dev. Built Environ., 17 (2024) 100359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100359.
  51. M. M. U. Islam, K. H. Mo, U. J. Alengaram, and M. Z. Jumaat, Mechanical and fresh properties of sustainable oil palm shell lightweight concrete incorporating palm oil fuel ash, J. Cleaner Prod., 115 (2016) 307-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.051.
  52. M. L. Abbas, W. A. Abbas, and E. Güneyisi, Effects of Using Cold Bonded Coarse and Fine Calcined Attapulgite Lightweight Aggregates on the Performance Properties of Microsilica and Fly Ash Blended Concretes, Arabian J. Sci. Eng., 50 (2024) 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08997-5.
  53. Siddique, R. and Belarbi, R., Sustainable concrete made with ashes and dust from different sources, Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering, Elsevier Ltd, Woodhead Publishing, 2022.
  54. Y. Zhao, J. Gao, S. Wu, and Q. Li, Strength development and microcosmic mechanism of waste glass powder cement mortar, J. Exp. Nanosci. , 17 (2022) 564-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2022.2126836.
  55. D. Ndahirwa, H. Zmamou, H. Lenormand, and N. Leblanc, The role of supplementary cementitious materials in hydration, durability and shrinkage of cement-based materials, their environmental and economic benefits: A review, Cleaner Mater., 5 (2022) 100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2022.100123.
  56. R. Kou, M.-Z. Guo, L. Han, J.-S. Li, B. Li, H. Chu, L. Jiang, L. Wang, W. Jin, and C. S. Poon, Recycling sediment, calcium carbide slag and ground granulated blast-furnace slag into novel and sustainable cementitious binder for production of eco-friendly mortar, Constr. Build. Mater., 305 (2021) 124772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124772.
  57. Ranjbar, N., A. Behnia, B. Alsubari, P. M. Birgani, and M. Z. Jumaat, Durability and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete incorporating palm oil fuel ash, J. Cleaner Prod., 112, P.1 (2016) 723-730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.033.
  58. M. M. Borhan, and N. Mohamed Sutan, Laboratory Study of Water Absorption of Modified Mortar, J. Civ. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2 (2011) 25-30. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.84.2011.
  59. Mehta, P. and P. Monteiro, Microstructure and properties of hardened concrete, Concrete: Microstructure, properties and materials, 4ed., United States: McGraw-Hill, 2014.
  60. L. Mlinarik, K. Kopecsko, and A. Borosnyoi, Properties of cement mortars in fresh and hardened condition influenced by combined application of SCMs, J. Silic. Based Compos. Mater., 68 (2016) 62-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.14382/epitoanyag-jsbcm.2016.11.
Statistics
Article View: 186
PDF Download: 170


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com