Khalaf, R. (2024). Mimicry and Multiculturalism from Colonial and Postcolonial Perspective in Rudyard Kipling’s ''Kim'' and Arundhati Roy’s ''The God of Small Thing''. , 2(1), 88-122. doi: 10.69513/jnfh.v1.i1.a6
Rakan Assi Khalaf. "Mimicry and Multiculturalism from Colonial and Postcolonial Perspective in Rudyard Kipling’s ''Kim'' and Arundhati Roy’s ''The God of Small Thing''". , 2, 1, 2024, 88-122. doi: 10.69513/jnfh.v1.i1.a6
Khalaf, R. (2024). 'Mimicry and Multiculturalism from Colonial and Postcolonial Perspective in Rudyard Kipling’s ''Kim'' and Arundhati Roy’s ''The God of Small Thing''', , 2(1), pp. 88-122. doi: 10.69513/jnfh.v1.i1.a6
Khalaf, R. Mimicry and Multiculturalism from Colonial and Postcolonial Perspective in Rudyard Kipling’s ''Kim'' and Arundhati Roy’s ''The God of Small Thing''. , 2024; 2(1): 88-122. doi: 10.69513/jnfh.v1.i1.a6

Mimicry and Multiculturalism from Colonial and Postcolonial Perspective in Rudyard Kipling’s ''Kim'' and Arundhati Roy’s ''The God of Small Thing''

Al-Noor Journal for Humanities
Article 6, Volume 2, Issue 1, 2024, Pages 88-122    PDF (1.11 M)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.69513/jnfh.v1.i1.a6
Author
Rakan Assi Khalaf*
Alnoor University / College of Education – Department of English, Mosul,Iraq
Abstract
This paper analyzes the mimicry, multiculturalism, the role of race, and the impacts of cultural colonialism on the inhabitants of India in Rudyard Kipling’s ''Kim'' and Arundhati ''Roy’s The God of Small Things'', highlighting colonial and postcolonial perspectives. Colonialism had diverse effects on the lives of the colonialized people. The researcher utilizes a qualitative analysis method to conduct this study and achieve its objectives. At the beginning, introductory notes about novels and novelists are given. Further, colonial and postcolonial concepts of multiculturalism and mimicry are elaborated. The findings of the study conclude that multiculturalism and mimicry hints are in abundance in both novels, which give rise to the issue of race and identity in the lives of the Indians. The effects of colonialism arouse the division between the white and the black, class and race between Indians and British on the one hand, and within classes in India on the other hand i.e. amidst touchable and untouchable within the same context and culture among Indians.
Keywords
Keywords: Colonialism; Postcolonialism; Mimicry; multiculturalism
References
  1. REFERENCES
  2. Aljibori, A. (2021). A Post colonial Reading Of Mohsin Hamid’s The Reluctant Fundamentalist And Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance Of Loss.Department of Programs English Language and Literature. Karabuk University.
  3. Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2013). Post colonial studies: The key concepts. London. Routledge.
  4. Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths & Helen Tiffin, (eds.) (2004). Key Concepts in Post colonial Studies. London & New York: Routledge.
  5. Azzedine, A. (2007). Colonial Myths: History and Narrative. Manchester University Press.
  6. Baines, D. (2010). Gender mainstreaming in a development project: Intersectionality in a Post colonial un-doing? Gender, Work and Organization, 17(2), 119-149.
  7. Barrett, M. (1989). Minority peoples in the age of Nation-States. Pluto Press (UK).
  8. Barsamian, D., & Roy, A. (2004). The chequebook and the cruise missile: Conversations with Arundhati Roy: Interviews. South End Press.‏
  9. Cesaire, Aime 2000. Discourse on Colonialism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  10. Chanady, A., (1995) From Differences to Exclusion: Multiculturalism and Post colonialism. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 8(3).
  11. Dalal, R., & Mehta, N. (2012). Anglophilia in Arundhati Roy is the God of small things, and Kiran Desai is the inheritance of loss. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research (AJMR), 1(4), 178-183.‏
  12. Dharwadker, V. (2011). Diaspora and cosmopolitanism. (pp. 125-144). Farnham: Ashgate.
  13. Dillingham, W. B. (2020). Kipling's Soldiers. English Literature in Transition, 1880-1920, 63(1), 118-123.‏
  14. Fanon, F. (1952) Black Skin, White Masks. London: Pluto Press, 1986.
  15. Fatima, B. (2010) Bensidhoun, Rudyard Kipling and Louis Bertrand: their Ideas of British Indian (ns) and French Algeria in Kim and the Sang des Races, 23-24
  16. Felski, R. (1997). The Doxa of difference. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 23(1): 1-21.
  17. Hollinshead, K. (1998). Tourism, hybridity, and ambiguity: The relevance of Bhabha's ‘third space’cultures. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(1), 121-156.‏
  18. Kipling, R. (1913). Kim. London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd.
  19. Kipling, R. (1901). Kim: Rudyard Kipling (Vol. 3527). Prabhat Prakashan.
  20. Kipling, R. (1901). Kim: The Naulahka; a Story of West and East, in Collaboration with Wolcott Balestier. Doubleday, Page.‏
  21. Kipling, R. (1991). Rudyard Kipling: Something of Myself and Other Autobiographical Writings. Cambridge University Press.
  22. Kipling, R., & Jarvis, M. (2009). Beyond the pale. CSA Word.‏
  23. Mullaney, J. (2002). Arundhati Roy's The God of Small Things. A&C Black.
  24. Nayar, P. K. (2008). Post colonial literature: an introduction. Pearson Education India.
  25. Orwell, G. (2012). Rudyard Kipling. The University of Adelaide Library.
  26. Plotz, J. (2004). Whose is Kim? Post colonial India Rewrites Kipling's Imperial Boy. South Asian Review, 25(2), 3-22.
  27. Young, R. (2001). Post colonialism: An Historical Introduction. Blackwell: Oxford
Statistics
Article View: 242
PDF Download: 68


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com