Confocal Microwave Imaging for Brain Diagnostics: A Performance Assessment of DAS and MVDR Beamforming Algorithms using Realistic Head Models

Abdulkareem, Rahmah J.; Abbosh, Younis; Ali, Dia

doi:10.33899/arej.2025.163849.1459

	Confocal Microwave Imaging for Brain Diagnostics: A Performance Assessment of DAS and MVDR Beamforming Algorithms using Realistic Head Models
Al-Rafidain Engineering Journal (AREJ)
Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 28 September 2025 PDF (642.33 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.33899/arej.2025.163849.1459
Authors
Rahmah J. Abdulkareem^* ; Younis Abbosh; Dia Ali
Biomedical Engineering, Electronics Engineering, Ninevah University, Mosul, Iraq
Abstract
Confocal Microwave Imaging (CMI) has recently emerged as a promising non-invasive method for detecting brain tumors, leveraging the dielectric difference between healthy and diseased tissues. This study evaluates the effectiveness of two leading beamforming algorithms—Delay and Sum (DAS) and Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR)—for confocal image reconstruction using simulated S-parameter data from CST Studio Suite v2024. Various head models were used, including homogeneous, symmetric heterogeneous, and realistically detailed heterogeneous (HUGO voxel) models. Both single- and multiple-tumor scenarios were explored. The MVDR algorithm significantly outperformed DAS in terms of tumor localization and spatial resolution, particularly in complex models and deep tissue layers, as demonstrated in our simulations. Adaptive beamforming techniques also achieved better spatial accuracy and contrast in heterogeneous brain phantoms. These results highlight the diagnostic potential of MVDR-based CMI systems and lay the groundwork for future advancements through the use of larger antenna arrays and the integration of machine learning strategies to enhance imaging performance.
Keywords
Confocal Microwave Imaging; Brain Tumor Detection; Delay and Sum (DAS); Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR)

References
C. Hagness, A. Taflove, and J. E. Bridges, “Two-dimensional FDTD analysis of a pulsed microwave confocal system for breast cancer detection: fixed-focus and antenna-array sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1470–1479, Dec. 1998, doi: 10.1109/10.730440. Dayarathna et al., “Deep learning-based synthesis of MRI, CT, and PET: Review and analysis,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 92, p. 103046, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.media.2023.103046. An et al., “Microwave time reversal for nondestructive testing of buried minor damage in composite materials,” Inverse Problems, vol. 40, no. 4, p. 045006, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/ad2902. Guo et al., “Microwave imaging via adaptive beamforming methods for breast cancer detection,” Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2006, doi: 10.1163/156939306775777350. B. Lim et al., “Confocal microwave imaging for breast cancer detection: Delay-multiply-and-sum image reconstruction algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1697–1704, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2008.919716. Mozaffarzadeh, A. Mahloojifar, and M. Orooji, “Image enhancement and noise reduction using modified delay-multiply-and-sum beamformer: Application to medical photoacoustic imaging,” in Proc. Iranian Conf. on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), 2017, doi: 10.1109/IranianCEE.2017.7985131. Ullah and T. Arslan, “Parallel delay multiply and sum algorithm for microwave medical imaging using Spark Big Data Framework,” Algorithms, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 157, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/a14050157. M. Abbosh, K. Sultan, L. Guo, and A. Abbosh, “Synthetic Microwave Focusing Techniques for Medical Imaging: Fundamentals, Limitations, and Challenges,” Biosensors, vol. 14, no. 10, p. 498, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/bios14100498. M. Abbosh, K. Sultan, and L. Guo, “Techniques to Enhance Performance of Confocal Algorithm in Medical Microwave Imaging,” in Proc. 2025 Int. Multi-Conf. on Signals, Systems and Devices (SSD), 2025, doi: 10.1109/SSD64182.2025.10990004. E. Moudden et al., “Directivity enhancement of microstrip antennas for high-resolution brain tumor imaging using characteristic modes theory and the confocal microwave image reconstruction algorithm,” E-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, vol. 10, p. 100854, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.prime.2024.100854. Ricci et al., “Performance evaluation of novel microwave imaging algorithms for stroke detection using an accurate 3D head model,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 3317–3331, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11277-017-4122-6. J. Bond et al., “Microwave imaging via space-time beamforming for early detection of breast cancer,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2002, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2003.815446. Klemm et al., “Microwave radar-based differential breast cancer imaging: Imaging in homogeneous breast phantoms and low contrast scenarios,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 2337–2344, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2010.2048860. C. Lepcha et al., “Image super-resolution: A comprehensive review, recent trends, challenges and applications,” Information Fusion, vol. 91, pp. 230–260, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.10.007. Yan, “A review of spectral data preprocessing techniques for machine learning and quantitative analysis,” iScience, vol. 28, no. 7, p. 112759, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112759. Hossain et al., “Microwave brain imaging system to detect brain tumor using metamaterial-loaded stacked antenna array,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, p. 16478, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20944-8. A. Elahi et al., “Comparison of radar-based microwave imaging algorithms applied to experimental breast phantoms,” in Proc. XXXIInd General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the URSI (URSI GASS), 2017, doi: 10.23919/URSIGASS.2017.8105082. Y. Lee, V. J. Parot, B. E. Bouma, and M. Villiger, “Confocal 3D reflectance imaging through multimode fibers without wavefront shaping,” Optica (Preprint), Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.446178.
Statistics Article View: 152 PDF Download: 69