Jasim, A., Kashan, J., Abed, A. (2025). Parametric evaluation and biomechanical assessment of a curved biodegradable ZK60 locking plate for femoral shaft fractures using finite element analysis. , 43(12), 1193-1207. doi: 10.30684/etj.2025.162401.1983
Ahmad S. Jasim; Jenan S. Kashan; Aseel H. Abed. "Parametric evaluation and biomechanical assessment of a curved biodegradable ZK60 locking plate for femoral shaft fractures using finite element analysis". , 43, 12, 2025, 1193-1207. doi: 10.30684/etj.2025.162401.1983
Jasim, A., Kashan, J., Abed, A. (2025). 'Parametric evaluation and biomechanical assessment of a curved biodegradable ZK60 locking plate for femoral shaft fractures using finite element analysis', , 43(12), pp. 1193-1207. doi: 10.30684/etj.2025.162401.1983
Jasim, A., Kashan, J., Abed, A. Parametric evaluation and biomechanical assessment of a curved biodegradable ZK60 locking plate for femoral shaft fractures using finite element analysis. , 2025; 43(12): 1193-1207. doi: 10.30684/etj.2025.162401.1983

Parametric evaluation and biomechanical assessment of a curved biodegradable ZK60 locking plate for femoral shaft fractures using finite element analysis

Engineering and Technology Journal
Volume 43, Issue 12, December 2025, Pages 1193-1207    PDF (1.1 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30684/etj.2025.162401.1983
Authors
Ahmad S. Jasim* 1; Jenan S. Kashan2; Aseel H. Abed1
1College of Production Engineering and Metallurgy, University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.
2College of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.
Abstract
This study evaluates the biomechanical performance of a novel curved biodegradable ZK60 magnesium alloy locking plate for plate osteosynthesis in midshaft femoral fractures classified as AO/ASIF 32-A3 (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation). Current metallic implants are associated with complications such as stress shielding, the need for secondary surgery, and limited support for biological healing. Biodegradable options offer promising solutions but remain insufficiently studied, especially regarding curved plate designs. This work addresses that gap by systematically assessing how plate thickness and curvature influence fracture stability. Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed under physiological loading of 700 N simulating a single-leg stance. Ten configurations were modeled, combining two thicknesses (4 and 6 mm) with five bending angles (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20°). A 5 mm fracture gap was simulated, and all constructs were fixed with bicortical locking screws. Axial stiffness and total deformation were calculated and compared with those of an intact femur. Results indicated that both increased plate thickness and curvature enhanced construct performance. The 6 mm plate bent at 20° showed the highest stiffness (2328.9 N/mm) and lowest deformation (0.3007 mm), representing a 6.6% increase in stiffness and 5.8% reduction in deformation compared with the flat counterpart. Similar trends were observed for the 4 mm plate. The evaluated designs achieved 23.8–25.4% of intact femur stiffness, aligning with the biomechanical window that promotes callus formation through controlled micromotion. Curved configurations also improved load transfer and screw alignment. Among the tested designs, the 6 mm plate bent at 15°–20° demonstrates the most favorable biomechanical characteristics for potential clinical translation.

Highlights
  • A novel curved biodegradable ZK60 locking plate was designed for femoral fracture fixation.
  • Finite element analysis showed that 6 mm plates had 10% higher axial stiffness than 4 mm plates.
  • Plate bending angles of 15°–20° improved load distribution and reduced stress concentrations.
  • The combined effects of thickness and curvature produced optimal biomechanical implant stability.
Keywords
Bone plate stiffness; Fracture fixation; Finite element analysis (FEA); ZK60 Magnesium Alloy; Biodegradable implants; Femoral shaft fracture; Parametric assessment
References
  1. O. O. Osinaike, A. O. Adekoya, M. A. Jaiyesimi, R. A. Akinola, B. O. Balogun, Radiographic spectrums of adults with traumatic femoral shaft fracture in the South‑West, Nigeria, Rwanda J. Med. Health Sci.,  7 (2024)  120–130. https://doi.org/10.4314/rjmhs.v7i2.2
  2. S. N. Bhat, A. Kumar, General Principles of Orthopaedic Plating and Overview, in Handbook of Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7540-0_12
  3. G. S. Lewis, D. Mischler, H. Wee, J. S. Reid, P. Varga, Finite element analysis of fracture fixation, Curr. Osteoporos. Rep.,  19 (2021)  403–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-021-00690-y
  4. P. Augat, M. Hollensteiner, C. von Rüden, The role of mechanical stimulation in the enhancement of bone healing, Injury,  52 (2021)  S78–S83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.009
  5. J. Barcik , D. R. Epari, Can optimizing the mechanical environment deliver a clinically significant reduction in fracture healing time?, Biomedicines,  9 (2021)  691. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9060691
  6. G. R. Rechter, R. T. Anthony, J. Rennard, J. F. Kellam, S. J. Warner, The impact of early axial interfragmentary motion on the fracture healing environment: A scoping review, Injury, 55 (2024) 12111917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111917
  7. Claes, L. E. 2022. Basic biomechanical factors affecting fracture healing, in Mechanobiology of Fracture Healing: From Basic Science to Clinical Application, Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94082-9_4
  8. Y. Mori, M. Kamimura, K. Ito, M. Koguchi, H. Tanaka, H. Kurishima, T. Aizawa, A review of the impacts of implant stiffness on fracture healing, Appl. Sci.,  14 (2024)   2259. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062259
  9. R. I. Abed, S. J. Abbas, W. A. A. H. Alsaadan‏, Mechanical analysis of bone‑plate construct regarding strength and stiffness, Nahrain J. Eng. Sci.,  23 (2020)  89–93. https://doi.org/10.29194/NJES.23010089
  10. M. Moazen, A. Leonidou, J. Pagkalos, A. Marghoub, M. J. Fagan, E. Tsiridis, Application of far cortical locking technology in periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation: A biomechanical study, J. Arthroplasty,  31 (2016)  1849–1856 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.013
  11. Y. Gao , B. Zhang, Probing the mechanically stable solid electrolyte interphase and the implications in design strategies, Adv. Mater.,  35 (2023)  2205421. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202205421
  12. D. R. Epari, R. Gurung, L. Hofmann‑Fliri, R. Schwyn, M. Schuetz, M. Windolf, Biphasic plating improves the mechanical performance of locked plating for distal femur fractures, J. Biomech.,  115 (2021)  110192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110192
  13. H. Zhang, Y. Hu, X. Chen, S. Wang, L. Cao, S. Dong, J. Su, Expert consensus on the bone repair strategy for osteoporotic fractures in China, Front. Endocrinol.,  13 (2022)  989648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.989648
  14. C. Huxman, G. Lewis, A. Armstrong, G. Updegrove, Z. Koroneos, J. Butler, Mechanically compliant locking plates for diaphyseal fracture fixation: A biomechanical study, J. Orthop. Res.,  43 (2025)  217–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25968
  15. Gupta, S. 2023. Bone healing in the presence of orthopaedic implants, in Handbook of Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology, A. Banerjee, P. Biberthaler, and S. Shanmugasundaram, Eds., Singapore: Springer, pp. 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6278-5_50-2
  16. Scolaro, J. A., Mehta, S. 2024. Tibial shaft fracture infection, nonunion, and malunion, in Prevention and Management of Common Fracture Complications, CRC Press, pp. 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003525875-34
  17. Proctor, A. The biomechanics of locking plates used in a supercutaneous fashion. M.Sc. Thesis, The University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/10214/28620
  18. P. Schwarzenberg, T. Colding‑Rasmussen, D. J. Hutchinson, D. Mischler, P. Horstmann, M. M. Petersen, P. Varga, Biomechanical performance of a novel light‑curable bone fixation technique, Sci. Rep.,  13 (2023) 9339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35706-3
  19. Fracka, A. B. Compaction effect on different densities of cancellous bone and immediate stability of an angle‑stable interlocking nail in a distal femoral osteotomy model. M.Sc. Thesis, Michigan State University, 2025. https://www.proquest.com/openview/7cf1b32d95c188ff3e8f06a6bcce7553/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  20. S. Zhang, D. Patel, M. Brady, S. Gambill, K. Theivendran, S. Deshmukh, L. J. Leslie, Experimental testing of fracture fixation plates: A review, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H,  236 (2022)  1253–1272. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119221108540
  21. R. Zdero, K. Gide, P. Brzozowski, E. H. Schemitsch, Z. S. Bagheri, Biomechanical design optimization of distal femur locked plates: A review, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H, 237 (2023) 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119231181487
  22. Y. Deng, H. Ouyang, P. Xie, Y. Wang, Y. Yang, W. Tan, W. Huang, Biomechanical assessment of screw safety between far cortical locking and locked plating constructs, Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng.,  24 (2021)  663–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1844882
  23. N. Tipan, A. Pandey, P. Mishra, Selection and preparation strategies of Mg‑alloys and other biodegradable materials for orthopaedic applications: A review, Mater. Today Commun., 31 (2022) 103658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103658
  24. J. Singh, A.W. Hashmi, S. Ahmad, Y. Tian, Critical review on biodegradable and biocompatible magnesium alloys: Progress and prospects in bio‑implant applications, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 169 (2024)  113111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2024.113111
  25. T. Zhang, W. Wang, J. Liu, L. Wang, Y. Tang, K. Wang, A review on magnesium alloys for biomedical applications, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.,  10 (2022)  953344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.953344
  26. S. Jayasathyakawin, M. Ravichandran, S. O. Ismail, Effects of hydroxyapatite addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of sintered magnesium matrix composites, Mater. Today Commun.,  35 (2023)  105582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105582
  27. Y. Luo, J. Wang, M. T. Y. Ong, P. S. Yung, J. Wang, L. Qin, Update on the research and development of magnesium‑based biodegradable implants and their clinical translation in orthopaedics, Biomater. Transl.,  2 (2021)  188–196. https://doi.org/10.12336/biomatertransl.2021.03.003
  28. X. Y. Lu, H. X. Cai, Y. R. Li, X. Zheng, J. Yun, A systematic review and network meta‑analysis of biomedical Mg alloy and surface coatings in orthopedic application, Bioinorg. Chem. Appl., 2022 (2022)1-32. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4529520
  29. N. Wang, Y. Ma, H. Shi, Y. Song, S. Guo, S. Yang, Mg‑, Zn‑, and Fe‑based alloys with antibacterial properties as orthopedic implant materials, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.,  10 (2022) 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.888084
  30. C. Zhang, P. Wen, Y. Xu, Z. Fu, G. Ren, Exploring advanced functionalities of carbon fiber‑graded PEEK composites as bone fixation plates using finite element analysis, Materials,  17 (2024) 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17020414
  31. M. Hu, M. Li, R. Ma, X. Li, X. Ren, L. Du, C. Zeng, J. Li, W. Zhang, Biomechanical analysis of titanium‑alloy and biodegradable implants in dual plate osteosynthesis for AO/ASIF type 33‑C2 fractures, Heliyon,  10 (2024) e26213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26213
  32. A. A. Al‑Tamimi, C. Quental, J. Folgado, C. Peach, P. Bartolo, Stress analysis in a bone fracture fixed with topology‑optimised plates, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol.,  19 (2020)  693–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01240-3
  33. A. A. Al‑Tamimi, 3D topology optimization and mesh dependency for redesigning locking compression plates aiming to reduce stress shielding, Int. J. Bioprint.,  7 (2021) 339. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i3.339
  34. J. Kurniawan, S. Y. Lin, W. T. Wang, Development and finite element analysis of a novel bent bone plate, Appl. Sci.,  12 (2022)  10900. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110900
  35. K. T. S. Tsumanuma, R. A. Caldas, I. D. Silva, M. E. Miranda, W. C. Brandt, R. P. Vitti, Finite element analysis of stress in anterior prosthetic rehabilitation with zirconia implants with and without cantilever, Eur. J. Dent.,  15 (2021)  669–674. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1727544
  36. J. Hu, Y. Peng, J. Li, M. Li, Y. Xiong, J. Xiao, P. Tang, Spatial bridge locking fixator versus traditional locking plates in treating AO/OTA 32‑A3.2 fracture: finite element analysis and biomechanical evaluation, Orthop. Surg.,  14 (2022)  1638–1648. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13308
  37. Ü. Saraç, S. Karadeniz, A. Özer, “Ideal plate–screw configuration in femoral shaft fractures: 3D finite element analysis, J. Surg. Med.,  5 (2021)  540–543. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.925624
  38. P. K. Satapathy, B. Sahoo, L. N. Panda, S. Das, Finite element analysis of functionally graded bone plate at femur bone fracture site, in IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.,  330, 2018,  012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/330/1/012027
  39. F. Layher, G. Matziolis, L. N. Kayhan, M. Bungartz, O. Brinkmann, Minimally invasive internal fixation of femoral shaft fractures, a biomechanical study with a disruptive technique, Life, 11 (2021)  1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11111254
  40. A. Hossain, J.  L. Tipper, D. Wei, A novel fracture fixation bone plate to reduce the stress‑shielding effects in long bones, The Australian Biomedical Engineering Conference (ABEC),  2019, 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.3316/informit.979429205566950
  41. Buckley, R. E., Moran, C. G., Apivatthakakul, T. AO Principles of Fracture Management; 3rd Edition., Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0038-160824
  42. T. Wisanuyotin, P. Paholpak, W. Sirichativapee, W. Sirichativapee, W. Kosuwon, Effect of bone cement augmentation with different configurations of the dual locking plate for femoral allograft fixation: Finite element analysis and biomechanical study, J. Orthop. Surg. Res.,  18 (2023)  405. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03894-3
  43. J. Coquim, J. Clemenzi, M. Salahi, A. Sherif, P. Tavakkoli Avval, S. Shah, R. Zdero, Biomechanical analysis using FEA and experiments of metal plate and bone strut repair of a femur midshaft segmental defect, Biomed. Res. Int.,  2018 (2018),  4650308. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4650308
  44. A. Soni, B. Singh, Design and analysis of customized fixation plate for femoral shaft, Indian J. Orthop.,  54 (2020)  148–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-019-00025-1
  45. J. Kurniawan, S. Y. Lin, W. T. Wang, Development and Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Bent Bone Plate, Appl. Sci., 12 (2022) 10900. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110900
  46. N. Fouda, R. Mostafa, A. Saker, Numerical study of stress‑shielding reduction at fractured bone using metallic and composite bone‑plate models, Ain Shams Eng. J.,  10 (2019)  481–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2018.12.005
  47. J. Nourisa, A. Baseri, L. N. Sudak, G. Rouhi, The effects of bone screw configurations on the interfragmentary movement in a long bone fixed by a limited‑contact locking compression plate, J. Biomed. Sci. Eng.,  8 (2015)  590–600. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2015.89055
  48. A. R. Mohammed, W. K. Jawad, Octagonal shape design through the use of FEA and experimental methods are created in deep drawing, AIP Conf. Proc., 3002, 2024, 060016. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0205958
Statistics
Article View: 53
PDF Download: 48


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com