Al-Hayali, A. (2026). The Legal Conditioning of the Religious State in the International System - Afghanistan as a Model. , 17(Issue: 1 part 2), 163-188. doi: 10.63677/jqlap.2025.166353.1472
Ahmed Faris Idris Al-Hayali. "The Legal Conditioning of the Religious State in the International System - Afghanistan as a Model". , 17, Issue: 1 part 2, 2026, 163-188. doi: 10.63677/jqlap.2025.166353.1472
Al-Hayali, A. (2026). 'The Legal Conditioning of the Religious State in the International System - Afghanistan as a Model', , 17(Issue: 1 part 2), pp. 163-188. doi: 10.63677/jqlap.2025.166353.1472
Al-Hayali, A. The Legal Conditioning of the Religious State in the International System - Afghanistan as a Model. , 2026; 17(Issue: 1 part 2): 163-188. doi: 10.63677/jqlap.2025.166353.1472
The Legal Conditioning of the Religious State in the International System - Afghanistan as a Model
AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences
A theocracy is a form of government in which the clergy hold supreme authority in managing the affairs of the state, including the enactment and enforcement of laws, whereby the will of the religious leader prevails over that of the people. Such a system raises concerns within the international community regarding its recognition as a state and its admission as a member of the international society, in addition to the religious, racial, and national problems it may generate both internally and externally. Nevertheless, a theocracy does not lack the three constituent elements of statehood—territory, population, and governing authority—and it enjoys international legal personality together with the rights and obligations arising therefrom. This gives rise to the central question of determining the status of a theocracy under international law: does it acquire statehood merely by fulfilling these elements, or only upon receiving recognition? Some scholars argue that, in the absence of recognition, statehood cannot be deemed complete, and consequently such an entity would lack a defined status under international law due to its inability to engage in political relations.