| Aims: This study sought to examine the relationship between cognitive independence and predominant temperamental styles among postgraduate students at Anbar University. A further aim was to determine whether significant differences exist in cognitive independence and temperamental style according to gender (male/female) and academic specialization (scientific/humanities). Methodology: The sample consisted of 300 postgraduate students (143 male, 157 female) drawn from nine colleges at Anbar University. Two instruments were employed: the Beckert (2005) Cognitive Independence Scale (27 items) and the Keirsey (1978) Temperament Sorter (70 items). Validity and reliability were established for both measures using appropriate statistical procedures within SPSS. Results: Findings indicated that 74% of postgraduate students exhibited both cognitive independence and a defined predominant temperamental style. A statistically significant positive correlation was found between cognitive independence and the following temperament dimensions: extraversion, sensing, thinking, judging, and perceiving. Conversely, a significant inverse relationship was observed between cognitive independence and the dimensions of introversion, intuition, and feeling. Conclusions and Implications: Based on these results, the researchers put forward several recommendations for supporting postgraduate development and proposed directions for future inquiry. |
- Beckert, T.E (2005). Fostering Autonomy in Adolescents: A Model of Cognitive Autonomy and Self-Evaluation, Paper presented at the American Association of Behavioral and Social Sciences, February16, Las Vegas, Nevada.
- Beckert, T.E. (2007). Cognitive autonomy and self-evaluation in adolescents: A conceptual investigation and instrument development. North American Journal of Psychology, Vol.9, N. 3, (pp. 575-590).
- Brandley, C.S. (2008). The Effect of Educational Intervention on Adolescent Identity, Cognitive Autonomy, Hope, and Educational Aspirations. A thesis of Master in Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
- Brodway, K, Jhng's, (1964): Psychological types, Journal of Analytical Psychology vol.9.
- Cavin, S. (2003). personality tests prove compatibility. Common traits important forcouples.
- Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing (4th ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
- Ganzel, A.K. (1999). Adolescent decision making: The influence of mood, age, and gender on the consideration of information. Journal of Adolescent Research, Vol.14,(pp.289-318).
- Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
- Hair, E. C., & Graziano, W. G. (2003). Self-esteem, personality and achievement in high school: A prospective longitudinal study in Texas. Journal of Personality, Vol. 71,(pp. 971-994).
- Keiresy D (1982), please understand me (I ), character &Temprament Types . newyork , Prometheus nemesis books.
- Kerisey, D. & Bates, (1978): Please Understand me, an essay on temperament Styles, New York, Prometheus nemesis, books.
- Reiser, M. L. (2007). A comparison of Cognitive Autonomy in Adolescents From a Residential, Treatment Center and Traditional High School. Master Dissertation. Utah University, Logan, Utah.
- Russell, & Bullock, (1986): Stress. Negative Social Exchange and Health.
- Thompson, R.A. (2006). Cognitive Autonomy in Adolescent. Master Dissertation. Utah University. Logan, Utah.
|