Sadiq, G., Mohammed, S., Abbas, S. (2024). Enhancement of materials for patellar tendon load-bearing orthosis: Design, analysis, and manufacturing study. , 18(4), 432-436. doi: 10.30772/qjes.2024.147968.1165
Ghanim SH. Sadiq; Salsabil K. Mohammed; Saif M. Abbas. "Enhancement of materials for patellar tendon load-bearing orthosis: Design, analysis, and manufacturing study". , 18, 4, 2024, 432-436. doi: 10.30772/qjes.2024.147968.1165
Sadiq, G., Mohammed, S., Abbas, S. (2024). 'Enhancement of materials for patellar tendon load-bearing orthosis: Design, analysis, and manufacturing study', , 18(4), pp. 432-436. doi: 10.30772/qjes.2024.147968.1165
Sadiq, G., Mohammed, S., Abbas, S. Enhancement of materials for patellar tendon load-bearing orthosis: Design, analysis, and manufacturing study. , 2024; 18(4): 432-436. doi: 10.30772/qjes.2024.147968.1165

Enhancement of materials for patellar tendon load-bearing orthosis: Design, analysis, and manufacturing study

Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences
Volume 18, Issue 4, December 2025, Pages 432-436    PDF (7.31 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30772/qjes.2024.147968.1165
Authors
Ghanim SH. Sadiq* 1; Salsabil K. Mohammed2; Saif M. Abbas2
1Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.
2Prosthetic and Orthotic Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Abstract
A patellar tendon bearing orthosis (PTBO) is used to support and shift body weight away from the area below the knee. Evaluation of various composite materials, Patellar Tendon Bearing Orthosis was conducted. Important details on the mechanical properties of each group by tensile and fatigue testing. Drawing and analysis PTBO model using Ansys Workbench 17.2. For perlon, the modulus of elasticity (E), yield stress, and ultimate stress were found to be 10.580 MPa, 37.895 MPa, and 1.253 GPa, respectively. Carbon fiber had better mechanical properties, with a modulus of elasticity (E) of 1.958 GPa, a yield stress of 116.878 MPa, and an ultimate stress of 174.163 MPa. In conclusion, Glass fiber displayed an ultimate stress of 99.725 MPa, a yield stress of 90.672 MPa, and a modulus of elasticity (E) of 1.589 GPa. The fatigue resistance of carbon fiber was found to be superior to that of perlon, indicating the extended lifespan made of carbon fiber. The outcomes of the experimental interface pressure tests show that the highest recorded values are on the lateral side (320 kPa) and the posterior side (253 kPa). This shows that the pressure was dispersed uniformly throughout the tissue and away from the bony areas, enhancing walking comfort for the patient. Acceptable in the PTBO model design were the safety factors, total deformation, and (Von-Mises) stress distribution obtained from numerical analysis for the carbon fiber PTBO model, which were 1.49, 0.969 mm, and 86.009 MPa respectively.
Keywords
Composite Material; Orthosis; PTBO model; Fatigue; Tensile test
References
  • K. Banga, P. Kalra, R. M. Belokar, and R. Kumar, “Design and fabrication of prosthetic and orthotic product by 3d printing,” Prosthetics and Orthotics, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94846
  • Elisa, F. Giorgio, B. Hadeel, B. Elisabetta, M. Giuseppe, and F. Franco, “A systematic review of questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction with limb orthoses,” Prosthet Orthot Int, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 158–169, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364614556836
  • A. Cabrera, P. J. Hill, W.-Y. Zhao, T. C. Pike, M. A. Meyers, R. R. Rao, and A. Y. M. Lin, “Prosthetic sockets: Tensile behavior of vacuum infiltrated fused deposition modeling sandwich structure composites,” Prosthesis, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 317–337, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis4030027
  • Peaco, E. Halsne, and B. J. Hafner, “Assessing satisfaction with orthotic devices and services: a systematic literature review,” JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 95–105, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1097/jpo.0b013e318217a0fe
  • P. Murphy, J. B. Webster, W. Lovegreen, and A. Simoncini, “12 - lower limb orthoses,” in Braddom’s Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Sixth Edition), sixth edition ed., D. X. Cifu, Ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2021, pp. 229–247.e2. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-62539-5.00012-6
  • Swinnen, C. Lafosse, J. Van Nieuwenhoven, S. Ilsbroukx, D. Beckw´ee, and E. Kerckhofs, “Neurological patients and their lower limb orthotics: an observational pilot study about acceptance and satisfaction,” Prosthet Orthot Int, vol. 41, no. 1, p. 41–50, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364615592696
  • Clementi, “The influence of residual limb and liner material properties on stress distribution in a transtibial amputee: a finite element analysis,” POLITesi - Digital Archive of Degree and Doctoral Theses, vol. 11, no. 1, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.politesi.polimi.it/handle/10589/1
  • H. Zaier and K. K. Resan, “Effect of the gait speed on a new prosthetic shank below knee,” Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, vol. 26, no. 4, p. 63–69, Jul. 2022.
  • J. Jweeg and M. Al-Asady, “Fatigue characteristics of patellar tendon bearing orthosis reinforcement materials,” International Journal of Energy and Environment, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 357–364, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.ijee.ieefoundation.org/vol8/issue4/IJEE 09 v8n4.pdf
  • S. Khaira, T. Coddington, A. Drew, P. N. Roberts, and C. H. E. Imray, “Patellar tendon bearing orthosis - application as adjunctive treatment in healing of lower-limb tissue loss,” Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, p. 485488, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1078-5884(98)80238-4
  • Marinopoulos, S. Li, and V. V. Silberschmidt, “Structural integrity of 3d-printed prosthetic sockets: An experimental study for paediatric above-knee applications,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 37, pp. 139–144, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2022.01.069
  • K. O. Noor K. Faheed, Qahtan A. Hamad, “Tensile and stress analysis of hybrid composite prosthetic socket reinforced with natural fibers,” Journal of Renewable Materials, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1989–2013, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2022.017573
  • EZaier and K. Resan, “Manufacturing of a new prosthetic shank from porous functionally graded materials and measuring of properties it,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 119388, 2022.
  • Tanaka, K. Nagata, T. Goto, H. Hoshiko, and A. Inoue., “The effect of the patellar tendon-bearing cast on loading,” J. of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 82-B, no. 2, pp. 228–232, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.82b2.0820228
  • Hamad, J. Oleiwi, and S. Abdulrahman, “Tensile properties of laminated composite prosthetic socket reinforced by different fibers,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 80, no. Part 3, pp. 2353–2359, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.348
  • Chang, C. Ko, B. Jeong, J. Kang, H. Choi, and e. a. Kim, G, “Changes in spatiotemporal parameters and lower limb coordination during prosthetic gait training in unilateral transfemoral amputees,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 361–73, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-021-00605-y
  • M. Abbas and A. I. Kubba, “Fatigue characteristics and numerical modelling prosthetic for chopart amputation,” Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, vol. 2020, no. 1, p. 4752479, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4752479
  • Abbas, “Fatigue characteristics and numerical modeling socket for patient with above knee prosthesis,” Defect and Diffusion Forum Journal, vol. 398, pp. 76–82, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.398.76
  • Ismail, Y. Kahtan, and S. Abbas, “A modified shank for below knee prosthesis,” IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 671, p. 012061, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012061
  • R. Kadhim, K. I. Yasir, and H. C. Shireen, “Stress relaxation on prosthetic laminated socket materials,” Journal of Engineering and Development, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 110–124, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://jeasd.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq/index.php/jeasd/article/view/770
  • Uniprox, “product catalogue, prosthetics, orthotics, materials and tools,” Quality and function Uniprox online, 2024.
  • ASTMD638, “Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics,” American Society for Testing and Materials Information, ASTM, no. ICS Code: 83.080.01, pp. 1–16, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1520/D0638-22
  • ASTMD3479, “Standard test method for tension-tension fatigue of polymer matrix composite materials,” American Society for Testing and Materials Information, ASTM, no. ICS Code: 83.140.20, pp. 1–6. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1520/D3479 D3479M-12
  • Miller, “Asm international handbook11: Failure analysis and prevention fatigue failures,” ASM International Handbook, p. 820Pages, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003544
Statistics
Article View: 196
PDF Download: 126


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com