Obaid, L. (2026). Numerical Exaggeration in the Mamluk Era: A Critical Study of Political and Military Events (648–923 AH / 1250–1517 CE). , 2026(2), 572-595. doi: 10.37653/juah.2026.169700.1420
Lanja Talaat Obaid. "Numerical Exaggeration in the Mamluk Era: A Critical Study of Political and Military Events (648–923 AH / 1250–1517 CE)". , 2026, 2, 2026, 572-595. doi: 10.37653/juah.2026.169700.1420
Obaid, L. (2026). 'Numerical Exaggeration in the Mamluk Era: A Critical Study of Political and Military Events (648–923 AH / 1250–1517 CE)', , 2026(2), pp. 572-595. doi: 10.37653/juah.2026.169700.1420
Obaid, L. Numerical Exaggeration in the Mamluk Era: A Critical Study of Political and Military Events (648–923 AH / 1250–1517 CE). , 2026; 2026(2): 572-595. doi: 10.37653/juah.2026.169700.1420

Numerical Exaggeration in the Mamluk Era: A Critical Study of Political and Military Events (648–923 AH / 1250–1517 CE)

Journal of University of Anbar for Humanities
Volume 2026, Issue 2, June 2026, Pages 572-595    PDF (4.42 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.37653/juah.2026.169700.1420
Author
Lanja Talaat Obaid*
College of Arts- University of Saladin
Abstract
Aims: This research aims to examine the phenomenon of numerical exaggeration in the Mamluk era (648–923 AH / 1250–1517 CE), particularly in relation to political and military events, by assessing the reliability of numerical data reported in historical sources, uncovering the political, rhetorical, and intellectual motives that contributed to their inflation, and elucidating the impact of such exaggerations on shaping the image of wars, conflicts, and political coups within Islamic historical consciousness. Methodology: The research adopted a critical historical approach based on the analysis and comparison of historical texts, through the examination of multiple narrations of a single event to identify points of agreement and divergence in the numerical data contained therein. The study also employed the Ibn Khaldunian method of critiquing historical accounts and linking them to the laws of civilization and human social organization, alongside an assessment of the demographic, economic, and military capabilities of the Mamluk state as a criterion for judging the realism of the numbers cited in the sources. Results: The findings indicate that numerical exaggeration represents a prominent characteristic of Mamluk historical writing. A number of historians deliberately inflated the figures of armies, casualties, and captives to magnify military victories, emphasize the intensity of battles, or portray political crises and internal coups in a more dramatic manner. The results further revealed significant discrepancies in the numerical accounts of the same event across different sources, attributable to weak statistical precision, the influence of rhetorical style, and reliance on uncritical transmission of reports. The study also demonstrated that many of the figures appearing in historical narrations exceed the actual demographic, economic, and military capabilities of the Mamluk state. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the numerical data found in Mamluk sources cannot be treated as precise statistical information; rather, they should be understood within their symbolic, functional, and narrative frameworks. The study further affirms the importance of adopting a critical comparative reading of historical sources and expanding the application of the Ibn Khaldunian method alongside modern interdisciplinary approaches in the study of Islamic history. This contributes to the reassessment of Mamluk state history on more accurate and objective scientific foundations, and to mitigating the influence of numerical exaggerations on the interpretation of historical events.
Keywords
Numerical exaggeration; Mamluk historians; political and military events; Ibn Khaldun's method; critical analysis
References
Original Arabic Historical Sources

  1. Ibn al-Athir, I. D. (d. 630 AH / 1233 AD). (1997). Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh [The Complete History]. Beirut: Dar Sader.
  2. Ibn Iyas, M. B. (d. 930 AH / 1524 AD). (2008). Bada’i‘ al-Zuhur fi Waqa’i‘ al-Duhur [The Flowers of History] (M. Mustafa, Ed.). Cairo: General Egyptian Book Organization.
  3. Ibn Taghri Birdi, J. D. (d. 874 AH / 1470 AD). (1992). Al-Nujum al-Zahira fi Muluk Misr wa al-Qahira [The Shining Stars in the Kings of Egypt and Cairo]. Cairo: Dar al-Kutub.
  4. Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, S. D. (d. 852 AH / 1449 AD). (2001). Inba’ al-Ghumr bi-Abna’ al-’Umr [Informing the Uninformed of the Sons of the Era]. Cairo: Dar al-Kutub.
  5. Ibn Khaldun, A. B. (d. 808 AH / 1406 AD). (2004). Al-Muqaddimah [The Introduction] (A. A. Wafi, Ed.). Cairo: Dar Nahdat Misr.
  6. Ibn Kathir, I. B. (d. 774 AH / 1373 AD). (1988). Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah [The Beginning and the End]. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
  7. Al-Dhahabi, S. D. (d. 748 AH / 1348 AD). (1998). Tarikh al-Islam wa-Wafayat al-Mashahir wa al-A‘lam [History of Islam and Deaths of Famous People]. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi.
  8. Rashid al-Din al-Hamadani, F. (d. 718 AH / 1318 AD). (1994). Jami‘ al-Tawarikh [Compendium of Chronicles (History of the Mongols)] (F. A. Al-Sayyad, Trans.). Al-Dar al-Thaqafiyya.
  9. Al-Subki, T. D. (d. 771 AH / 1370 AD). (1992). Tabaqat al-Shafi‘iyyah al-Kubra [The Great Biographical Dictionary of Shafi’is]. Cairo: Dar Hijr.
  10. Al-Qalqashandi, A. B. (d. 821 AH / 1418 AD). (1987). Subh al-A‘sha fi Sina‘at al-Insha [The Dawn for the Blind in the Craft of Composition]. Cairo: Dar al-Kutub.
  11. Kirakos of Gandzak (d. 670 AH / 1271 AD). (1986). Tarikh Arminiya [History of Armenia] (A. Kashishian, Trans.). Dar al-Hiwar.
  12. Al-Maqrizi, T. D. (d. 845 AH / 1442 AD). (2001). Ighathat al-Ummah bi-Kashf al-Ghummah [Helping the Nation by Unveiling the Grief] (M. M. Ziyadah, Ed.). Cairo: General Egyptian Book Organization.
  13. Al-Maqrizi, T. D. (d. 845 AH / 1442 AD). (1997). Al-Suluk li-Ma‘rifat Duwal al-Muluk [The Road to Knowledge of the Kingly Dynasties] (M. M. Ziyadah, Ed.). Cairo: Dar al-Kutub wa al-Watha’iq.
  14. Al-Nuwayri, S. D. (d. 733 AH / 1333 AD). (2004). Nihayat al-Arab fi Funun al-Adab [The Ultimate Ambition in the Arts of Erudition]. Cairo: Dar al-Kutub.
 

Modern Arabic References and Studies

  • Abu Khalil, Shawqi (2005). Islamic History: The Middle Ages. Damascus: Dar al-Fikr.
  • Al-Zaydi, ‘Abd al-Karim (2010). The Method of Historical Criticism According to Ibn Khaldun. Baghdad: Dar al-Shu’un al-Thaqafiyya.
  • Al-Zarkali, Fu’ad (2019). “The Methodological Problem in Historical Numbers.” Journal of Arab History, Issue 18.
  • Al-‘Amri, ‘Abd al-‘Aziz (2012). The Mamluk State: Political and Military Systems. Cairo: Maktabat Madbuli.
  • Hasan, ‘Abd al-Rahman (2017). Number and Significance in Islamic Historiography. Amman: Dar al-Masira.
  • Husayn, Muhammad ‘Abd Allah (2015). Historical Method and the Criticism of Numerical Narratives. Cairo: Dar al-Ma‘rifa al-Jami‘iyya.
Foreign References

  • Bloch, M. (1954). The Historian’s Craft. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Holt, P. M. (1986). The Age of the Crusades: The Near East from the Eleventh Century to 1517. London: Longman.
  • Humphreys, R. S. (1991). Islamic History: A Framework for Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Theses and Peer-Reviewed Studies

  • Al-Shammari, Ahmed (2018). “Exaggeration in Numerical Figures in Islamic Historical Sources: A Critical Study.” Journal of Historical Studies, Issue 12.
  • ‘Abd al-Rahman, Sami (2020). “Criticism of Numerical Narratives in Medieval History in Light of Ibn Khaldun’s Method.” Journal of Humanities, University of Baghdad, Vol. 25, No. 3.
Statistics
Article View: 170
PDF Download: 95


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com