- All Journals
- Al-Qadisiyah University
- Basrah University
- Kirkuk University
- Mosul University
- The Iraqi Borad for Medical Specialization
- University of Anbar
- University of Technology
- Al Mustafa University
- Al-Zahraa University for Women
- Alnoor University
- Kunooz University
- Misan University
- Ninevah University
- Tikrit University
- University of Al-Hamdaniya
- University of Kerbala
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Richard Nixon’s Political Speeches | ||
| Journal of Language Studies | ||
| Volume 10, Issue 2, Part 2, June 2026, Pages 426-450 PDF (659.09 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.25130/Lang.10.2.P2.22 | ||
| Author | ||
| Lect. Sada Ali Hamid | ||
| History Department, College of Arts, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This research provides a critical analysis of Richard Nixon’s Watergate speeches through Fairclough’s (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) framework, highlighting how language functions as a means of sustaining political power and legitimacy during times of crisis. The central problem addressed in this research concerns how Nixon’s discourse constructs and controls agency, accountability, and public perception through linguistic and rhetorical strategies. Specifically, the study aims to identify how ergative verbs, passive constructions, and modality serve to shape meanings of blame, responsibility, and authority; to explore the discursive strategies through which Nixon negotiates self-legitimation; and to analyze how these linguistic patterns reflect and reproduce broader ideological and power relations between the presidency and the public. It is hypothesized that Nixon’s use of passives and ergative verbs obscures personal agency, while his moral appeals and references to national duty enhance credibility and deflect blame. These findings reveal how political discourse operates as a mechanism of power, ideology, and persuasion in maintaining institutional legitimacy. This study focuses on fifteen selected excerpts from Richard M. Nixon. A qualitative form of analysis is adopted in this study. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| discourse analysis; ergative verbs; modality; passive constructions | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 109 PDF Download: 41 |
||