Partial annulment of a civil judgment (A comparative study)

Al-Harithy, Ziad Mohammed Shihada

doi:10.63677/jqlap.2026.171484.1602

	Partial annulment of a civil judgment (A comparative study)
AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences
Article 28, Volume 17, Issue: 2 part 1, September 2026, Pages 601-620 PDF (507.38 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.63677/jqlap.2026.171484.1602
Author
Ziad Mohammed Shihada Al-Harithy^*
College of Law\ University of Mosul
Abstract
Annulment is the dispute that is involved in the court on our behalf when the ruling from the court of first instance is appealed before it. This annulment takes away part of the civil ruling that violated the law or the shortcomings in it were completed by the old excuse to change the outcome of the ruling. Then a court addresses the case and its effect does not reach the annulment court. Annulment leads to effects, including permanent effects and others that are transitive, minor effects that settled on the period of the annulled ruling where this paragraph failed. There is evidence, as well as its adequacy and the validity of the judicial order, the effects of the transitive effects, the partial philosopher, so they include in the court’s response to participating in the issue of each and the second alternative effect: cancel all effects. The positive evidence did not invalidate the ruling. In preparing the research, we will rely on the analytical approach to legal texts and jurisprudential opinions related to the subject, and we will favor the sound opinions among them, explaining the reasons for favoring them. Then, we will rely on the comparative legal approach that most legal research studies have adopted, by comparing the legal texts contained in the Iraqi Civil Procedure Law
Keywords
Partial rescission; civil judgment; rescission; procedural law; civil law

Statistics Article View: 40 PDF Download: 25