-Arab relations Suffered from the U.S. shortcomings in their interactions, and lacked scales and standards that have long characterized the relations interactive between States, and this is what enabled the other party to launch a number of projects Althmicih the first party to be a project (the Greater Middle East) conclusion in tune and what is required for the construction of U.S. global .
The quick read of history discern them that the concept of (Middle East) has been used by European colonial powers during World War I, mainly to meet the escalating manifestations of emission in the Arab national consciousness.
The United States has developed a vision (Middle East) includes Arab parties, all of which accept a political settlement to the Arab - Israeli conflict, with both Israel and the Shah's Iran and Turkey, with an emphasis on the importance of economic relations and coordination, and in the framework of the Madrid Conference in 1991, she joined U.S. and Israeli interests in the re-drafting of a map of the area across the width of an appropriate form to enter Israel in the region tends her specifications geographical historical and features of the history of civilization and culture, and stresses in the economic geography of contemporary global market system to create the core market of Middle East is expanding gradually from Israel as a nucleus, and its role as an attractive and dominant economic and technology, security, and civilians.
The progress of this offer, "Shimon Peres" in his book (the new Middle East) as well as "Benjamin Netanyahu" in his book (place under the sun), as it was presented Israel as a developed industrial center of an ocean of backwardness the Arab, and a democratic state between systems, dictatorship, and as a military deterrent managed to bring the Arabs to the negotiating table after their conviction that no room for Israel to defeat militarily.
Note from the foregoing that the Middle East as a U.S. - Israeli has become expanded to include various Arab countries, as it was explain to these States that normalization should include a space wider, and this offer expansion for "East Eastern" emphasized by former U.S. President "George Bush (the father) in the word off the opening session of the Conference of Madrid when he said: "Our goal is not end the war in the Middle East, and replaced by the absence of war ....?! That this will not last, but we want real peace, I am talking about the security and economic relations, trade and cultural exchange. "
We have designed the Bush administration (son) after the occupation of Iraq to the United States itself the task of building a large Middle East directly, and not Israel, and the task of the overall restructuring of the Arab world and the Muslim world ... ?! And who knew you know Project (GME), and the Bush administration (the son) may Geert whole world between the support of the so-called (terrorism), or fight it, and Bush tried the link between terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and is designed to monopolize the administration alone to identify threats different, and did not accept the participation of others, including European allies themselves in that selection, but threatened to everyone that it is not joined to his vision in this regard; but enter automatically in the category of supporting terrorism or covered up, and even in the framework of this selfishness Israel has withheld its key in the perception being a party to the first regional believes in attacking Iraq the interest of the strategy for him, do not stop view of the Israeli at the borders of removing weapons of mass destruction or regime change in Iraq, but beyond that a lot, and within the scope of the strategic vision of the post change and develop ideas says that the new system in Iraq must enter the political settlement system actor head, as it would agree on the wording of the existing political settlement, and also a party to enter through the implementation of Iraq's transition to the most yards resettlement as part of the settlement of the most difficult dimension in the equation of the settlement.
Hence the need to secure (Israel) from behind the attack on Iraq exceeded the goals of America, and here we enter in the context of the Israeli vision for the region as a whole, which starts mainly from the desire Israel's ancient fragmentation of the major entities in the region, Israel has on several occasions and is still working in the fragmentation of the major entities in the Middle East, specifically in the Arab world in order to ensure the exercise of the role of regional domination and control, and starts to verify this perception through the fragmentation of the major entities in the region, which is a central idea and the perception of the founders of the Zionist movement and thought leaders of the Jewish state.
In sum, on the Arabs to stand up for the project risk is to put the identity Middle East to the Arab Islamic identity that they work on the establishment of a cultural renaissance genuine, be a sign for the Arabs in their response to the dominance of the Israeli - American in the economic, cultural, media, and others, and so will be shut down incursion of the Zionist entity in the Arab world and maintain their national identity and the Arab presence. |