After this brief account of the hidden competition between France and Britain in Syria between the years 1944-1946, we can record the most important findings of the study.
One of the most important reasons that called for the British to deal with caution and tense competition with the French, he still managed to return the allies of France to NATO and that on 6/6/1944, we find that this did not deter the two countries in finding solutions to guarantee their political interests of both parties in Syria.
Negotiations axis foundation serves the three parties (France, Britain, Syria) in order to satisfy the needs strategy, and took those negotiations the form of notes or the exchange of letters, they were the parties involved know very well that the military option will end the effort that went and got through on the privileges can be improved.
Precedence of the French occupation of Syria to make the Syrians wary caution and concern of the French, especially since the others follow the policies of chauvinism and hostility against the Syrian people and become difficult to remove that image influencing preference and that's why the Syrians for the British against the French.
Hit France all the values, international considerations the wall through its policy and approach in Syria, especially as the Syrian issue gained the support of the Allied Powers and in particular the United States, Britain, Russia and some Arab countries, which confirms that the rivalry between Britain and France is to dominate the region in order to gain interest .
Britain's position at the official Syrian moves for independence was erratic but eventually bore the burden of confronting the French in Syria in May 1945.
Notes that the British were repeat that they do not want to sow their influence in Syria instead of French influence, but they were planning for that, indirectly, through the annexation of Syria to the Arab gathering exemplified the Arab League, which is Britain's influence is clear in, which confirms the competitive British-French-hidden in the the region.
The French insisted on securing their interests that were involved under the hidden struggle between them and the British, as that was a face from the faces of the conflict on the sharing of power in the region to enjoy this region of the ingredients, which are elements of social and natural resources is at the same time return to put in the Sykes - Picot known.
Did not stop Syrian arms crossed in front of provocations French but took work to reduce them but they chose the diplomatic work for this purpose and may be largely due to several things, including lack of power equation to equality and equity as well as the lack of support for my work for the cause of the Syrian, most European countries and the United States U.S. was supported by the official political discourse without practical move.
The House of Representatives was the Syrian role in curbing the ambitions clearly French in Syria, through its demand and absolutely not to have any negotiations with the French side that will make France is conveniently at the strategic level in Syria.
That the French, despite their adherence to the diplomatic side, but on the other they have not given up military measures to ensure their interests in the region, which reveals the falsity of the French government in dealing with the negotiations and good faith. |