After this trip in the levels of stylistic formation in Maimih Abdul Hassan Zalzala, we determined the results of _khasnaha as follows:
1 - that the poet did not record the title of a poem, so we relied on character Ruwi (Almim) Vsameenaha (Maimih Abdul Hassan Zalzala) Perhaps the reason for this; that the focus of which revolve around the events of the poem, is the testimony of Imam Hussein (as) it serves as the axis from which All events and interpreted to him, as the poet deliberately to make the recipient take the approach "Tamili" in tracking the fingerprints of shipping in the letter to reveal the title of the poem, which melted in the crucible of the text.
2 - In our study of the level of voice, which is an essential element of stylistic analysis of the text, we found that enjoyed by the poet of skill in the selection of sounds and harmony with the meanings desired in the construction of linguistic and technical, as well as "for the accuracy of the poet in the use voices Almjhorh and repeat some of the votes and added Arts rhetorical voice "and rhetorical" and musically, "such as the phenomenon of repetition and naturalization, and other artistic beauty to the broadcast receiver.
3 - Then we examined the level of morphological, because of its importance to know the structure of speech may cite some formulas Almazidh on Aljdhiralthelathi (verb) Obianat denote these increases and harmony with the will of the poet in an atmosphere of meditation to explore the meanings of T contained in the formulas Almazidh and its relation to sense intended.
4 - The fourth level has studied the structural level, which is an important pillar of the pillars underpinning the significance, we studied the first is three phenomena: the presentation and the delay and the second: Chapter Iiithma and interfaces: the accumulation of actions.
5 - The final level has a level of semantic, which is the building block of language, and an essential foundation for all studies, as it was necessary to search for approach enables the identification of significance in the level of linguistic one as accurately as possible, and Achtsrna for fear of stretching Mguetbarn on the theory of semantic fields and its relation to the generic term collected, this theory has led a prominent role in the clarity of meaning desired destination semantics. |